Ask HN: Review my startup CanYouCode.com
http://www.canyoucode.com
CanYouCode is a freelancing website, which is different in the following ways:
1. Minimum rate of $35/hr - likely more. (you can't find good freelancers for anything less.)
2. Profiles are reviewed before being allowed to bid - We verify LinkedIn profiles, Open Source contributions, Blog, proper web standards etc.
Basically the idea is to target developers who can't survive on the $10-20/hr at Elance or oDesk. Currently we are accepting signups only from the US and Europe.
We would like inputs on: 1. It is interesting? 2. How to get traction? 3. Should we apply for YC Winter 2011?
Thank you.
83 comments
[ 0.15 ms ] story [ 211 ms ] thread2. Make sure your clients have a really good experience and then help them promote you.
Since this is a marketplace, you have to stimulate both supply and demand. Supply: contact good coders and ask them to sign up. Demand: work very hard to get clients into the system, and follow up with them.
Also: the name "canyoucode" is aimed at developers, that's not very good, should be aimed at clients. And finally: having the site full of dummy date is kind of crap. I would go with a closed beta. Again, you have to stimulate supply and demand: you need to make sure that your first coders get good clients (and then blog about that), and that your clients get good coders (and then blog about that). I would make it closed beta at first.
This is one of the things we plan to do. In fact, our backend lets us make pre-filled developer profiles which just need to be 'activated'.
edit: You are probably right about the dummy data. We could try a closed beta. This has been up for just a few hours.
How will you distinguish your review process and qualifications from the certification tests that oDesk offers? Arguably your internally-reviewed approvals will be more valuable than "User X passed the HTML Level 1 test" but how will you communicate that to clients searching your site for freelancers?
The review is something we hope to figure out soon (as we reach volumes that we cannot handle ourselves).
We are looking at how the quality on HN stayed sane over the past years. And how we can include crowd-sourced moderation and ratings without people gaming the system to their advantage.
Other pain points to address:
It's very tiring having to bid on dozens of projects and never getting any work. This is a major problem for new freelancers. You have to lowball dozens of bids in hopes of getting your first ratings.
Something like Odesk's tests for freelancers but higher quality.
Buyers should also be reviewed not just freelancers. Putting money into escrow before accepting a bid should be mandatory, at least for new buyers.
I've used about five different freelancing websites in the past but it's been a while since then and I think a lot of problems are not coming to mind now. I'll let you know if I think of more pain points I would like to see addressed.
EDIT: I tried signing up but my current address is not in a country listed in your dropdown menu. I don't see why you would limit Europe to a handful of countries. If you can do business in one EU country, you can do in all of them thanks to the economic union.
Also, this fair-pay guarantee is what we hope will attract the folks who will be lost in the noise at Elance/oDesk.
We debated the escrow arrangement, but decided that we step out of the way once the employer and provider reach an arrangement. Other freelance sites stay on as middlemen, because the revenue model is in taking commission off the development fee.
I just tried to sign up and got this error
Internal Server Error
Yesterday it worked. Today it is not working. Internet is like that.
You can go to the home page, or shout at us.
Edit: What prevents you from allowing people from other countries from signing up? Isn't this just a service that connects clients with programmers? From the looks of it, you aren't even handling payments or doing anything else that could get you into trouble with law enforcement.
The result is that really good talent from the West stays away from freelancing portals, because they just get lost in the volumes out there.
This is not a good situation, since there is a ton of great talent in the West (probably more than anywhere else).
You could also have something like Gold Star, Silver Star, Bronze Star rating for new developers so as to alleviate anxiety from selecting a bid from a new buyer.
New user star rating earned by things like, experience and references from their LinkedIn, Open Source attributions, and a rating on their website (by standards, how many posts their website has - don't tell them that can help their ranking though. Also could include in the ratings formula any tests that they completed on your site if you implement that (maybe make it so the highest rating they can be without completing any tests is Silver Star even if their resume is above and beyond).
I agree with everyone else who mentions escrow (most definitely) and testing for developers.
What hasn't been mentioned yet is some kind of work tracking system. I personally don't like systems which seem like big brother is looking over my shoulder as I code (you know which sites I'm talking about), but a system where the dev could post a snippet of what they're doing or even the ability to post the updated source (to be archived and viewable by you only of course, to be seen in cases of a dispute in hours).
Wouldn't this just incentivize people to keep making new accounts? If there's going to be a minimum, there shouldn't be any exceptions or it defeats the point and allows people to game the system.
What the price is should not matter either, unless you are looking to set up a shop that people will know will overcharge or where the people from the 'west' can set up shop without competition.
The good developers/designers I know charge way more than that. And people are willing to pay for predictable results.
I'm sure the market will find a way to accommodate the price/quality relationship without adding restrictions like this.
It's not that it's impossible or insurmountable, just that it requires effort that a start up may not be willing or able to put in at release.
Exporting isn't as easy as selling in your native country. People are able to do it because someone went through the effort of studying the laws of the country being exported to and determined that it would be profitable to export to that country.
And yes i do "export" my services to few countries so i would say i have experience with it.
The idea seems to be to restrict this to western countries only
As a developer, I may even be willing to pay a screening fee, if I would be able to get good quality work.
Apply to YC. You will get support, ideas, and make great relationships. That will also help you get traction and gain credibility.
Are you serious? That's about what my wife charges to give horseback riding lessons, and we live out in the country. Near a big city it would be a lot more expensive. I'd like to think that even an average developer should expect more per hour.
There's not much logic in that country list. I kinda understand (but not really) that Slovenia (my country, part of EU) is not listed there, but Austria, Switzerland, etc are also missing. That means I can't register and give you more feedback.
And I'm sure your country has many brilliant minds to offer - same as any other country.
It asks me to select a username and then states:
"Your company's url is http://www.canyoucode.com/username
Both me and my partner want to sign up but we can't both have the same username, but it seems wrong to have two separate company urls...
We both want to set up individual profiles and then link them together as a company profile...
1. The username is assigned to the company; users cannot login individually. 2. But once you login, you can add various user profiles and credentials to the company profile.
Once you log in, you can add as many "employees" as you want to the company profile. (Note that one employee (admin) was already added during Signup).
This is sort of similar to basecamp. But we haven't done a good job explaining it on the site.
Perhaps that's an ignorant assumption, but I don't think I'm alone in this.
Charge more.
I am skilled and work for less as an employee (before tax) in Romania.
$35 * 160 hours per month = $5600 a month
Of course, there is nothing stopping consultants charging more. The idea was simply to do away with ridiculously low rates.
Wold class talent should not settle down for "acceptable monthly income" and "decent living standards", that's what we reasonably competent talent do. And even the reasonably competent freelancers should be charging twice as much, just to compensate for the lack of benefits, the depreciation of their infrastructure, and the fact that they will not likely be able to book 4 x 40hr-solid weeks month after month.
The whole point of your little startup is to cut off the people who leaves in countries with lower cost of living. You should rename it as WeCantCompete.us
I've hired extremely responsive, very good freelance developers on elance for less than $35p/h.
Although I do agree with the positioning of the site as a 'premium' experience.
If anything, for PR purposes, I'd focus a lot on how difficult it is to get accepted into the site as a developer. May be good to push the rate higher and only accept developers who have a personal recommendation from an already accepted developer. For example, make it similar to how http://www.dribbble.com/ handled their initial invitation process.
This keeps the perceived quality high and will ensure the site has a key marketing differentiator from other outsourcing sites.
1) Having a linkedIn profile shouldn't be required to sign up.
2) The 'pages' associated with an account don't seem super useful to me right now. A lot of my most interesting work is not graphical in any way, so given that the main element of a 'page' is the image that is not super helpful.
Maybe a 'projects' section as well/instead? That way I can provide links to GitHub pages or whatever.
What checks do you have on the jobs posted by employers?
In future, such posts will be removed. The site will initially be moderated by us. Eventually, we want to bring in more user participation in this moderation.