Ask HN: Why are SF startup salaries stagnant?
In the Bay Area for early stage startups, I'm still seeing a common salary offer of 140K. Contrast that with Lincoln, Nebraska, I've seen a couple of posting for devs up to 160K (https://bit.ly/2MRqmRI ).
Meanwhile the big players, Facebook, Google, have distanced themselves with comp packages in the 300-500K range (with RSUs).
Is the midwest finally becoming competitive?
7 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 15.7 ms ] threadBut in any case, why are startup salaries stagnant? Because for most positions at startups, they don't really need "the best", they need someone with basic competencies, so there's no need to pay more than that.
These RSU packages are very common among Bay Area companies for an engineer with 5+ years of quality experience. You don't even have to go to a company like Facebook or Google. Take your pick of Twitter, Square, Box, Uber, Lyft, Pinterest, AirBnB, Splunk, Dropbox, or take your pick of any decent public company really...even Oracle will make these offers in their cloud division...
Yes you have to be talented and work hard, but it's completely within reach for most reasonably talented devs whether they know it or not.
Caveat? Reasonably talented.
There does seem to be a bit space that's opened up between the bigs, and startups. 10 years ago it was 200K at Apple, 100 at startup + options.
Now it's 140-180K at startups and 400K at BigCo. There are lots of BigCos btw. Apple, Facebook, Stripe, Dropbox, Uber, Lyft, Airbnb, Square, Twitter, Slack. Anyone with 300M+ valuation. (Even if they still call themselves startups :-)).
I worry a bit that startups at the 5-50 person level will have trouble getting the talent they need to challenge BigCos.
Here's a good discussion from the VC/founder perspective.
https://mobile.twitter.com/andrewchen/status/101387729764709...