I disagree. Though I think righteous indignation is a real problem, it's also often used as a label that can be applied to any negative response to one's own opinions - to paint any negativity at all as automatically unreasonable and unworthy of any credence. I think the trend of antagonistic-first approaches to other people is a much more worrying problem, and that highly antagonistic people are more likely to reach prematurely for the accusation of "righteous indignation" (not accusing you of that).
I wonder if this could be associated with the fall of long-term emoloynent rewards, willingness to train on the behalf of employers, and the decrease of benefits like pensions. Such systematic changes tend to reward behavior that only benefits the self.
Perhaps the problem is more like the inability to stop bifurcating everything into opposite which the article itself both alludes to and practices. Whoops! I think I did it, too.
5 comments
[ 2.0 ms ] story [ 23.6 ms ] thread