They're likely using a commercial facial recognition system which includes that feature for demos at trade shows. People love getting external validation, which also explains why the scores are all greater than 70.
Numbers don’t really say much unless you pin them to what they’re measuring: they might not be calibrated against a percentile. For example, on a linear scale with 0 being “horrendous” and 100 being “insanely attractive”, I’d rate most of the people I know much closer to 70 than a 50: the average person could stand to look a lot worse.
Sigh, there's always one. The point is that's not a sufficiently clear definition of what's being measured. Someone I find attractive you might find unattractive, because it's a subjective attribute, so 'attractiveness' isn't an unambiguous description of what the algorithm is actually measuring.
If it’s a feature for making people who try your system at a trade show feel good about themselves as they said, it works best if it’s not measuring anything at all.
I digress, surely naming is really hard. there's a sweet spot to hit short and sufficiently explanative. Perhaps this didn't hit it for you, but it probably did for the target audience, and if it didn't, they could call support for the product they paid for.
> The system also uses its facial recognition systems to detect ethnicities and labels them — such as “汉族” for Han Chinese, the main ethnic group of China — and also “维族” — or Uyghur Muslims, an ethnic minority under persecution by Beijing.
I'm getting some strong ww2 death camp vibes from this...
Oh come on. They’re attempting to “re-educate” a culture out of existence, to prevent the transmission of a language, a religion and an identity, a culture and using the most brutal methods to do so but there are no plans to kill everyone. It’s quite evil enough without trivialising actual attempts at genocide, like in Rwanda, WWII or the Dzhungar genocide. This is an attempt at cultural erasure, not a full blown plan to kill everyone of a particular ethnicity. The PRC party-state will gladly take any Uyghur who will cast off their culture and treat them as a loyal citizen.
They're smart enough to do essentially the same thing, but in a "soft" manner: overwhelm the area with Han Chinese and make it as difficult as possible for the local population to thrive, turning the once majority ethnic group into a almost non-existent minority over many generations (they've also done this in Tibet). The Chinese are calculating their empiric efforts over centuries. It's one of the "benefits" of a totalitarian regime.
Like Tibet they been encouraging Han Chinese to move to Xinjiang for decades. But now that they are putting many of the native Uyghur population in camps, their attempts at tightening their grip on the povince seem to be accelerating.
> The PRC party-state will gladly take any Uyghur who will cast off their culture and treat them as a loyal citizen.
If you are Uyghur, you are permanently stamped by it. They will track and watch you with suspicion forever. It will specifically limit your opportunities, the life that is available to you. And since your friends and family are likely Uyghur, in the minds of the authorities that provides all the more reason to be suspicious of you.
This comment breaks the site guidelines, is unacceptable on HN, and is generally beyond the pale. Please don't vandalize HN this way. More generally, please don't post unsubstantive comments, especially not on such a highly charged topic.
On the bright side, at least they make sure their technology works for minorities as well. Perhaps the egalitarian ideas of the West are finally starting to take hold there.
I read an interview with a former KGB officer who said that, while the book was formally banned in the soviet union, it was circulated among national security types as a useful fund of ideas.
from the article:
“The security researcher passed details of the database to TechCrunch in an effort to get the data secured”
How is the data more secured by sending it to a news agency? Can someone explain? IMHO it’s the exact opposite, data is getting more eyeballs now, right?
Surely this is one of those technological advances where on reviewing the 'should we' it becomes clear the negatives far outweigh the positives and it is stopped... Surely.
Reminds me of a radio interview I heard this morning from a mining CEO awaiting environmental sign-off for a new mine: equipment and resources ready to get going with a couple of days notice. Not even a matter of if, but when.
35 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 95.7 ms ] threadEdit: E.g. this article mentions a system being demoed with that feature: https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2018/04/03/598012923/...
That's why it has the label "attractive"
I digress, surely naming is really hard. there's a sweet spot to hit short and sufficiently explanative. Perhaps this didn't hit it for you, but it probably did for the target audience, and if it didn't, they could call support for the product they paid for.
I'm getting some strong ww2 death camp vibes from this...
This is room 101.
If you are Uyghur, you are permanently stamped by it. They will track and watch you with suspicion forever. It will specifically limit your opportunities, the life that is available to you. And since your friends and family are likely Uyghur, in the minds of the authorities that provides all the more reason to be suspicious of you.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
How is the data more secured by sending it to a news agency? Can someone explain? IMHO it’s the exact opposite, data is getting more eyeballs now, right?
https://www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2007/01/schneier_fu...
Now, obviously, this cycle hasn't been gone through in the PRC
See #10 at https://www.dictionary.com/browse/secure.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3007827/chin...
Considering that ES db aren't secured by default, it's not surprising that someone downloaded the data
Reminds me of a radio interview I heard this morning from a mining CEO awaiting environmental sign-off for a new mine: equipment and resources ready to get going with a couple of days notice. Not even a matter of if, but when.