When American states have considered religious freedom laws that would allow wedding florists, photographers and the like to not work at same-sex weddings, some U.S. companies have threatened not to make further investments in those states.
Whatever one thinks about those laws, murdering people for their organs is much more serious. So why don't U.S. companies that imagine themselves to be enlightened say they will not invest in new offices and factories in China unless the organ harvesting stops?
Many jurisdictions (in the USA) that subjugate LGBTQ individuals also happen to be isolated (relative to CA/NY) small markets. China, on the other hand is the world’s largest economy.
It is easy to boycott some small town or poor state; it is harder to do the same for a major economic power.
Because the computer you wrote the comment on was made in china, or a large amount of components were. The devices used to transmit the data to the internet were likewise made in China.
How convenient that the part of humanity they finger out as running the “crime of the century” is economically opposed to Quillete’s love of the american free market. In reality both these governments are just as bad. Chinese and muslim? Have your culture destroyed. Bad luck with the law in the US? Have your life destroyed, either by bullets or neglect in camps or prison.
Compare this to all the people who have been incarcerated for drug posession, if they were not originally framed. Why would china pay any attention to our LACK of morals? We have no ground to stand on.
>In reality both these governments are just as bad.
I don't understand how people do the math on this or why such arguments come up when it involves news they don't like.... rather than actually talk about the story itself.
I would guess that people are perceiving the news to be a part of a wider mud-slinging match between two super powers and would rather argue about who gets to cast the first stone.
You don’t argue with propaganda. Completely missing from this article are all the reasons we can’t say shit about china: our own human rights record is terrible and everyone knows it.
Whataboutisms, a frequent strategy of the CCP's concerted online influence effort, are counterproductive. Drawing a false equivalence between crimes against humanity in China and lesser events in the US does not a justification make.
Please keep tired tropes like "whataboutism", and other canned arguments, out of HN threads. They're repetitive, add no information, and lead to predictable discussion.
Please don't take HN threads further into nationalistic or ideological flamewar. That's going the wrong way down a one way street—it is not what this site is for.
I was a bit curious did a bit of digging around into this, and I found this[1] article linked to on a rationalwiki article on Falun Gong. It seems to call into question the claim that china is doing a lot of secret organ transplants
17 comments
[ 4.4 ms ] story [ 46.5 ms ] threadAt least, there should be investigations of people returning from surgery in China.
Whatever one thinks about those laws, murdering people for their organs is much more serious. So why don't U.S. companies that imagine themselves to be enlightened say they will not invest in new offices and factories in China unless the organ harvesting stops?
It is easy to boycott some small town or poor state; it is harder to do the same for a major economic power.
Compare this to all the people who have been incarcerated for drug posession, if they were not originally framed. Why would china pay any attention to our LACK of morals? We have no ground to stand on.
I don't understand how people do the math on this or why such arguments come up when it involves news they don't like.... rather than actually talk about the story itself.
Plenty of previous explanation at https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
[1]https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/in-the-fac...