Ethically, comparing to the CIA is about lowest bar possible.
I thought the poster was implying that the USPS was enforcing ownership even though they didn’t create or provide the content, so making your own mailbox wouldn’t help at all.
You’d have to ask them.
> Natural gas is roughly half as bad as coal Not if you enter a feedback cycle of greenhouse gas emissions. That is DEFINITELY the enemy of good.
> It would be so much easier just to create the ideal environment in a large, rotating cylinder instead of having adjust a planet's environment to our needs. Yea but people want to go outside.
...assuming we have any skill at maintaining infrastructure, and looking around this country we really don’t. Look at the oil pipeline leaks just in the last year.
> That's extraordinary nonsense. What are you basing this on?
> It's a semi-automated system for creating clickbait to manipulate public opinion. What differentiates this from any other media outlet?
> And the linked article showed you that, in practice, "a shambles" is perfectly correct English. I'd think "in practice" would mean evidence of contemporary usage.
...for traditional use, maybe, but any editor worth their salt will stop you from doing so. At least in America. Many words have changed their meaning and use over the last 500 years.
> Facebook claims this violates their TOS. Based on that, the data can be called stolen. They can call it that sure, but if they didn’t restrict access it’s hard to take this as anything but Facebook covering the entire…
How does my comment qualify but not the submitted article?
I read this as too violent/unfriendly to amass substantial interest from people, not a value judgement per se.
How convenient that the part of humanity they finger out as running the “crime of the century” is economically opposed to Quillete’s love of the american free market. In reality both these governments are just as bad.…
Do you accuse people of the obvious a lot? Because manipulative ads seem to be the lingua franca of us politics.
Why not ban heuristics altogether?
Not ironic at all! If I were a foreign entity pushing for bilateral agreements I would seed paranoia and doubt everywhere I could. The degree of explicit control that comes out of this manipulation is miniscule compared…
> I'm not sure where this author went to college, but outside of a major city like London or NYC, you'd be hard pressed to find a more experientially diverse place (in America, at least) even amongst freshmen. This…
Apple Watch + AirPods is more than the price of a new Apple phone.
I was under the impression redux is basically a message bus plus some sugar. Is that wrong?
I’m curious if they tested the wavelengths that wood fires give off as well as moonlight—this would most closely match “natural” light exposure post twilight.
I would imagine complacency is far more economically valuable than intelligence.
Email addresses are case sensitive, at least you’re supposed to assume they are.
> The clear payoff is: as far as we've seen, life only exists on one place in the universe, so it makes sense to spread it out. Sure, if the short term concerns don’t do us in first. You’re talking about an extremely…
It seems very counter intuitive that you’d ADD reliability with additional features and surface area for bugs.
Ethically, comparing to the CIA is about lowest bar possible.
I thought the poster was implying that the USPS was enforcing ownership even though they didn’t create or provide the content, so making your own mailbox wouldn’t help at all.
You’d have to ask them.
> Natural gas is roughly half as bad as coal Not if you enter a feedback cycle of greenhouse gas emissions. That is DEFINITELY the enemy of good.
> It would be so much easier just to create the ideal environment in a large, rotating cylinder instead of having adjust a planet's environment to our needs. Yea but people want to go outside.
...assuming we have any skill at maintaining infrastructure, and looking around this country we really don’t. Look at the oil pipeline leaks just in the last year.
> That's extraordinary nonsense. What are you basing this on?
> It's a semi-automated system for creating clickbait to manipulate public opinion. What differentiates this from any other media outlet?
> And the linked article showed you that, in practice, "a shambles" is perfectly correct English. I'd think "in practice" would mean evidence of contemporary usage.
...for traditional use, maybe, but any editor worth their salt will stop you from doing so. At least in America. Many words have changed their meaning and use over the last 500 years.
> Facebook claims this violates their TOS. Based on that, the data can be called stolen. They can call it that sure, but if they didn’t restrict access it’s hard to take this as anything but Facebook covering the entire…
How does my comment qualify but not the submitted article?
I read this as too violent/unfriendly to amass substantial interest from people, not a value judgement per se.
How convenient that the part of humanity they finger out as running the “crime of the century” is economically opposed to Quillete’s love of the american free market. In reality both these governments are just as bad.…
Do you accuse people of the obvious a lot? Because manipulative ads seem to be the lingua franca of us politics.
Why not ban heuristics altogether?
Not ironic at all! If I were a foreign entity pushing for bilateral agreements I would seed paranoia and doubt everywhere I could. The degree of explicit control that comes out of this manipulation is miniscule compared…
> I'm not sure where this author went to college, but outside of a major city like London or NYC, you'd be hard pressed to find a more experientially diverse place (in America, at least) even amongst freshmen. This…
Apple Watch + AirPods is more than the price of a new Apple phone.
I was under the impression redux is basically a message bus plus some sugar. Is that wrong?
I’m curious if they tested the wavelengths that wood fires give off as well as moonlight—this would most closely match “natural” light exposure post twilight.
I would imagine complacency is far more economically valuable than intelligence.
Email addresses are case sensitive, at least you’re supposed to assume they are.
> The clear payoff is: as far as we've seen, life only exists on one place in the universe, so it makes sense to spread it out. Sure, if the short term concerns don’t do us in first. You’re talking about an extremely…
It seems very counter intuitive that you’d ADD reliability with additional features and surface area for bugs.