Ask HN: Why is IE6 still so popular?
According to some stats[1], IE6 has about 11% market share. Seems kinda high. Are these users worth bending over backwards for to allow them to use your site?
I'm almost done implementing a new web app. I've been using Chrome during development almost exclusively due to its great set of debugging tools. From time to time I'll then go open it up in firefox and fix little CSS inconsistencies.
But now that we're nearing the launch of our v1, we have to consider IE compatibility. Since we used tools like JQuery, the site behaves as expected, but the CSS is all messed up.
By technology standards, IE6 is ancient. Why don't IE6 users install Chrome, IE8, Firefox, or anything else?
Is IE6 still popular because it was the default browser in XP, people don't want/can't upgrade to Windows 7, and since they're using a pirated copy, they can't upgrade IE?
I'm sure there are some enterprise users, like my wife, who are forced to use IE6 because IT hasn't been given the budget to upgrade everyone. But they shouldn't be more than a percentage point in browser market share, right?
How do we kill it? Do we turn our noses up at it and force users to at least install Chrome Tab? Have other developers found this to be a workable compromise? Is there a javascript library that will automatically convert a site's CSS to a versin that's IE compatible?
[1] http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2
14 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 47.2 ms ] threadIf, on the other hand, you are after the consumer market, I'd suggest you forget IE6 altogether. Any home user still using an un-upgraded copy of WindowsXP is not going to want to spend money for software anyway, so forget them.
The point is: it doesn't matter if IE6 has 11% of the global market share. The important question is: what percentage of your target audience do they own?
Decide you don't want the money the Enterprisey folks represent. Or, be so important to their business that they'd rather upgrade than do without you.
If you're selling something people aren't going to purchase from or for their enterprise cubicle(s), forget it.
--
Oops. I forgot to add research. A family member needs their site to remain usable/attractive to the significant corporate population in this area who will visit it while researching options from work. A lot of big, stuffy businesses whose employees are potential customers for this local business.
We recommend to out clients that they use the compounding development cost of chasing IE 5-6 and non-JS browsers and apply it to targeting mobile platforms. You get more bang for your buck doing so. By eliminating IE < 7 and none JS browsers you are walling yourself of from a little less than 10% of the market but the development effort to chase them increased development cost nearly 2x, targeting the iPhone (especially if your web was built with a REST backbone) is significantly cheaper 5K is the average app build, will net a better return on investment.
As well some assumptions can be made about older browser uses, they are either not early adopters or are using a corporate PC and may have access to a more modern environment at home or via a mobile device while not quantifiable, these factors will certainly work to reduce that total market size of non-modern browsers.
As I always say to clients, if you get to the point where you have to chase that < 10% for growth you have a good problem.
Chrome Frame is one way out of these situations, but convincing IT that it's a good idea is a struggle at best.
A significant proportion of internet users don't know what a browser is, and if they see a website that advises them they need to download a piece of software to get it to work, they instantly distrust it. In all honesty it's probably better overall that people who don't know about browsers do ignore websites with buttons telling them they'll enjoy a better viewing experience if they download and install extra software.
Like people using the latest cutting-edge iPads, they'll just have to miss the occasionally useful flashiness that their default browser doesn't attempt to support. The average person that hasn't upgraded by now probably isn't going to be swayed by yet another broken rendering or "this site is only viewable in IE7+ or Chrome or Firefox"
The only party that can seriously reduce IE6 market share is Microsoft, by using OS updates to force upgrades and creating an "IE6 mode" that allows those kludgy enterprise apps to continue to function.
If the entire internet didn't work on it, you bet your ass these slow-poke Enterprise folks would figure something out ;)
China has a LOT of IE6 users because of historical issues related to SSL export restrictions. NetMarketShare's 11% number for IE6 is higher than IE7 (8%), which is ridiculous. So unless you have a lot of Chinese users, the number from StatCounter (5%) is probably closer to the truth - http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-ww-monthly-201001...
Most (if not all) of the management tools that are currently being used by major corporations are made for IE6 (because thats what was big when it was designed and purchased).
The other particular reason happens to be schools. In highschool (and still now in college) the IT team hasn't managed to get clearance to upgrade (it might /cost money/!)
Congratulations, A winner is You for anything in the US. I can't vouch for anything else, so there's 5% of the share.
http://code.google.com/p/ie7-js/