28 comments

[ 5.3 ms ] story [ 68.4 ms ] thread
Them: "Hell is Other People"

Me: Why would you say something so controversial, yet so brave?

A much more correct translation of the Sartre quote would be, "Hell is the Other", where "the Other" is a term of art in philosophy with a great deal of nuance, but it's funnier to translate it as "Hell is other people", so we do.
The original is: "L'enfer, c'est les autres"

As a French native speaker, "Hell is other people" is indeed how I'd have translated it myself.

"L'enfer, c'est les autres". I don't know what "the Other" you're referring to, "the other people" seems correct to me in meaning. IANAPhilosopher tho
That's not what Sartre intended to mean and Huis Clos doesn't support that interpretation.
I really don't quite get this nihilistic look at social media. Yeah, it can be very annoying and it has plenty of downsides. But it also provides plenty of information sources, often good ones, lets you connect to people easier. And no, I don't mean the superficial connection, I mean getting to know someone, exploring their interests and hobbies, meeting up in real life, etc.

While I don't get the appeal of sites like Foursquare or apps like Snapchat, I think the real problem with social media is data harvesting. The rest - the social aspects which many find vapid - are totally fine in moderation. It's just that people, as always, took an idea to the extreme and corrupted it.

Even Hacker News has the bones of social media but, thanks to proper moderation and good etiquette, it's not as divisive as most sites.

> I mean getting to know someone, exploring their interests and hobbies

That might have been true of the first decade of the new millennium, when Last.fm was in its heyday, Goodreads was more popular, and Facebook had a very different algorithm for its feed. But today, Facebook's interface does not really highlight that kind of depth in your peers, and much of the younger generation has moved to Instagram which is centered around the uploaded photo and so misses out on those interests in life that are not so photographable.

Facebook and Instagram are just the two most popular examples but stuff like forums, group chats, reddit, Twitter, tumblr, they're all social media (or social media-adjacent, I guess) and people make friends there all the time. I do think Facebook might be beyond the point of no return but even Instagram has these huge communities of people posting book photos or pets, which is vapid but innocuous and harmless, at the very least.
Every single stranger I developed an online based friendship with was a small community. I don't understand how you can do anything meaningful in a conversation with 2000 people - but 20 people in a chatroom/forum/etc mucking about? Sure.
Who still has Foursquare installed on their phone?
Hey! That's my GitHub name! I'm down to work on this project for a bit to make it better if you'd like.
Not to be pedantic or anything but that's an incorrect use of the word "anti-social".

anti-social = disruptive or destructive to society (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-social_behaviour)

asocial = lack of desire to be social (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asociality)

I’m not a fan of asocial, it sounds passive, ambivalent. I’ll keep using anti-social for this, since anti-societal would be more apt for that concept.
Maybe it's a US vs British English thing, but I definitely associate "anti-social" with meaning disruptive to society (e.g. Anti-social behaviour orders in the UK [1])

Upon saying that, "asocial" doesn't really sound right to me. I'd probably go with "non-social" or maybe more poetically use "misanthropic".

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-social_behaviour_order

There's nuance to each of the terms. Asocial is what I would say an introvert often is; avoids social interaction without necessarily wishing ill, perhaps dislikes being in the company of others. Anti-social behaviour is disruptive to others, perhaps violent.
There's more than one definition of antisocial. The second definition from Oxford is "Not sociable; not wanting the company of others".

This usage is colloquially extremely common.

https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/antisocial

Well, you're all wrong, because I define sociability as a network of vectors, and I say 'antisocial' is when you reciprocate someone's sociability back toward them (along the same vector, but in the opposite direction).
>Well, you're all wrong, because I define sociability as [...]

Jesus... Do you read what you write before you post it?

Honestly shocked that people don’t see that as being obvious sarcasm.
Yeah, sure; I'm equally appalled Poe's Law hasn't been considered, especially on a site like HN.
I recommend adding a "/s" to the end of sarcastic comments for those of us who have trouble interpreting sarcasm
I don’t believe the DSM still uses the term anti-social for precisely this reason.
This could use a (2013) tag.

There's a writeup here [0], basically he's creating a voronoi diagram from friends' locations, as queried by FourSquare. With the voronoi diagram the intersections of the lines map out points equidistant from the nearest neighbors, which is what I'm guessing he's visiting in the video clips.

0: http://scottmadethis.net/interactive/hellisotherpeople/