No, you meant to feel good about complete human failure in an avoidable prediction that we didn’t avoid. Predictions aren’t fact, we accomplished nothing. You are applauding air while 800 million starve. Seriously, stop…
Are those words actually weighted with the assumption you are making, or are you just trying to feel better about 800 million people going hungry? The nuance between English words aren’t really apparent in poverty…
Had you spent time in the humanities, you would understand why your argument is fallacious. Science discovers, engineering creates, humanities decide.
Said like an ignorant man about a topic they nothing about.
What a useless world that would create.
Too nerdy isn’t valuable feedback, it’s derogatory.
How exactly?
Most of HN is shitting on popular things with a hot take and a smug condescending tone, usually erroneously. If Conical hadn’t tried new projects and failed, the poster would complain that they never innovate. People…
Oh, no, that’s what happens in YOUR mind.
Why exactly?
It’s less the obscurity, and more that to a layman, you are saying in the title that modelling doesn't work, or it really doesn’t work. Understanding your audience and all that. Someone should write an article about it…
The headline really cuts off the points nose.
I own the hardware.
You can expect all you want, I expect you’ll be disappointed. The goal to keep the web in that languid state is of the same ilk of the buggy whip. It’ll have archaic use cases, but the numbers won’t make sense for a lot…
They aren’t.
Accessibility isn’t being discussed here. All my sites are accessible, don’t conflate the two.
This isn’t mine, but the number of my users with js turned off isn’t worth the effort. You guys make a lot of noise, but not a lot of traffic.
I’m not a fan of asocial, it sounds passive, ambivalent. I’ll keep using anti-social for this, since anti-societal would be more apt for that concept.
No, you meant to feel good about complete human failure in an avoidable prediction that we didn’t avoid. Predictions aren’t fact, we accomplished nothing. You are applauding air while 800 million starve. Seriously, stop…
Are those words actually weighted with the assumption you are making, or are you just trying to feel better about 800 million people going hungry? The nuance between English words aren’t really apparent in poverty…
Had you spent time in the humanities, you would understand why your argument is fallacious. Science discovers, engineering creates, humanities decide.
Said like an ignorant man about a topic they nothing about.
What a useless world that would create.
Too nerdy isn’t valuable feedback, it’s derogatory.
How exactly?
Most of HN is shitting on popular things with a hot take and a smug condescending tone, usually erroneously. If Conical hadn’t tried new projects and failed, the poster would complain that they never innovate. People…
Oh, no, that’s what happens in YOUR mind.
Why exactly?
It’s less the obscurity, and more that to a layman, you are saying in the title that modelling doesn't work, or it really doesn’t work. Understanding your audience and all that. Someone should write an article about it…
The headline really cuts off the points nose.
I own the hardware.
You can expect all you want, I expect you’ll be disappointed. The goal to keep the web in that languid state is of the same ilk of the buggy whip. It’ll have archaic use cases, but the numbers won’t make sense for a lot…
They aren’t.
Accessibility isn’t being discussed here. All my sites are accessible, don’t conflate the two.
This isn’t mine, but the number of my users with js turned off isn’t worth the effort. You guys make a lot of noise, but not a lot of traffic.
I’m not a fan of asocial, it sounds passive, ambivalent. I’ll keep using anti-social for this, since anti-societal would be more apt for that concept.