Ask HN: If you're so smart how come you're not rich?
I don't know about you, but I am smart. I know I'm smart, I am told that I am smart, I do smart things but . . . I am also old, and all my life I have worked (mostly) for people who were not smart as me, and somehow they:
* were my boss
* had a better/faster career
* or .... they owned the company
I am old now, but I can still kick some ass, and that's what my intention is.
When I was younger I was:
* insecure: some of that shit still lingers.
* anxious: yeah, this is related to the shit above, but I wanted to highlight it. And while I am over it, some of that shit still lingers
* more smarterer #LOL
* more courageous, in a way. Now that I am less anxious and more secure, I seem to have lost the hump!
Any tips for me how to overcome the snart-complex, kick my own ass, and start making money?
88 comments
[ 20.7 ms ] story [ 5040 ms ] threadIn the US, If you can get 500k from friends and family, you can buy a $5m company with a strong balance sheet and strong cash flow. It will give you a live Petri dish to test your ideas on how to do things better.
You do realize this does not apply to 99.9% of the population right?
If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich? Turns out it’s just chance.
The most successful people are not the most talented, just the luckiest, a new computer model of wealth creation confirms. Taking that into account can maximize return on many kinds of investment.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2018/03/01/144958/if-youre-...
I think there have been studies and books done about successful people (can't remember the authors). The book basically said that luck is the main influence. There are plenty of smart people who aren't rich and certainly some average people who are. I want to say the experts consider luck to be less than 10% of the success formula.
The real question is what moves have you made to get rich? Have you started making a product? You cannot ride (perceived) intelligent to riches.
By identifying ourselves as being smart we are getting into the trap of being hostages of this label. Lot of scenarios in our life require us to make mistakes. Mistake is something a smart person cannot afford and deliberately avoids.
We are awarding ourselves with an achievement award of being smart without actually doing the work (doesn't it feel great to be smart?). Being smart is a capacity to think logically, not something we achieved in life. It is given, but to feel fulfilled we need to do something with it.
By declaring myself smart I set the scale of measurement for myself, and then I suffer when somebody smarter than me is around. Understanding that even my intellect is not something that defines me is a crucial piece of this puzzle. Intellect is one of the MANY tools available to each one of us. Exploring those tools requires some .... testing and learning, and intellect is a very lousy helper here.
And if you really want to focus on the money in your life - look at the people around you. Money come from the relationship with the people around us not from the ideas, thoughts, reasoning. Knowing you strength and focusing on helping people - producing much better outcome long term than focusing on a great idea.
So as you said - time to kick your own ass! ;)
Hope this was useful.
smart people focus only on polishing their own skills, but that doesn't scale.
The smart people I know that are not rich because of one of two prime reasons:
1. They are not wealthy because they are not driven to make money. The scientist, the stereotypicial engineer, the altruist. The majority of self-made wealth I have seen is due to a real desire to make money, and work hard at it with little regard to other concerns like how enjoyable or prestigious the work is.
2. They are smart in particular areas, but really let themselves down in others. Maybe they can’t work well with others, maybe they intellectually can’t do sales, maybe they don’t keep motivation to work on a winning thing, maybe they gamble or drink, maybe they have psych issues.
Note that there are plenty of exceptions to the above (gain wealth despite the above, or lose it even with the above).
Finally plenty of smart people just don’t value money that highly - they are smart enough to have different goals in life. My guess is you want money for the social status but that you don’t actually care much about money - if so maybe accept that and choose your own path.
By most metrics I am rich, just not private jet 0.1% rich.
I work at a big tech company and make >200k/yr. I have few financial worries.
At this point I’m not primarily motivated by more money. Sure I’ll take it, but at this point I’d sooner spend my time and energy on other more important things. Family, friends, hobbies, etc. The financial security to focus on those things makes me feel pretty rich.
Am I not smart for being satisfied working for someone else and rarely working more than 40hrs/wk?
I could conceivably retire if I moved to a low cost area, but I enjoy my lifestyle so will keep at it a bit longer.
I am in a similar position but what keeps me from thinking about early retirement is not knowing what will be my financial needs in the future, and I'm concerned that I might not be fully aware of the role that luck played in getting a cushy life.
Like work on those 100 ideas a day.
What I want is enough money to say no to work I don't really like, enough money for allowing me to choose what to do with more liberty.
This is probably why the term "financial independence" was coined, to break away from this misconception.
Retirement/financial independence is not needing the paycheck anymore. It's owning all of your time to use how you want.
There are plenty of "retired" people that don't sit around on their ass all day. They've retired from the full time rat race but are very much active, doing what they want to do. It might even still sometimes look like "work", but it is on their terms.
But if you have to slog at boring jobs for a lot of years in order to accumulate that big pile of money allowing you to become FI you'll have to consider if it's worth it. Maybe after being FI you'll keep working but you'll have the privilege to choose only jobs or projects aligned with your needs and desires. If that's the case: is it worth it the years and years working at boring jobs? do you really need to be FI if you'll keep working after?
I'm not against having money on the bank, my approach is having enough to live several years without income, allowing me to reject things I really don't want. But I don't want to spend years just trying projects with no results, I want to do things valuable for other people and getting money in exchange is the way to be sure you're actually doing it.
It's not mutually exclusive.
> my approach is having enough to live several years without income, allowing me to reject things I really don't want.
This is what "FI" part means. the financial independence.
I understand financial independence as "having enough to retire without needing any more income", so the amount of money is not the same.
What happens when you're diagnosed with a serious, career-ending chronic disease?
Financial independence has nothing to do with having a relaxing retirement at a young age.
I wish I had realized this younger, for multiple reasons.
I call it the Disney princess effect - most of them are rich enough to not work, but they end up lost and drafted into things that are bigger than themselves. They end up working harder than anyone.
Maybe a rich person is someone who has enough that their priority is not personal wealth.
Also under that definition, developing nations are richer than developed nations, as developed nations have earlier retirement ages, shorter working hours, less debt, and more financial security.
Have you ever fell in love to the point where you’d do anything for that person and that person can do no wrong in your eyes?
Make that person yourself.
Takes practice!
Taking on a lot of risk, pushing yourself to the limit gets you to be rich.
Also add in a whole lot of luck.
But I agree that the main thing separating an employee from a founder is that one actually started a business. I disagree about the whole pushing yourself to the limit thing however. If you found a business or try to build a career, you are in it for the long haul. Sustained effort is what you need.
Generally when I see people complain about things they haven't achieved, I see two problems: posture and outlook. Posture is simple: if you want things to happen, you have to stop waiting for them to happen and actually take step to make them happen.
In my opinion, outlook is generally the main problem however. Just stop casting a bad light on what you have already done and put forward the good the part instead. Enjoy what you have achieved and start working on what you want to do next. What's done is done anyway. Also it's easier to convince people to do things with you when you have a positive outlook.
Anyway, if you are pondering why something didn't happen to you, unless you are looking for the reasons you failed in order to improve, you are most likely asking the wrong question. Start looking forward rather than backward.
I think this is true, but not in the obvious "Your parents will give you money" or "Your social network will help you" but for (having grown up poor and now doing OK) it's the implicit safety net that allows you to take risks that allow you win (or lose!) big.
I rather think being born rich gives you a different risk tolerance and that raises your chance of becoming rich(er).
Conscientiousness is the limiting factor to economic success.
One doesn't need to be very smart, just lucky enough to get the opportunities, smart enough to recognize them, and hard enough working to follow through.
Making millions takes a lot of hard work. I'd rather work on my hobbies.
So, as a first step, count intelligence as nothing more than a (very) rough constraint on what you might possibly accomplish, but nothing more. It covers the ante, but not the hand.
People think a lot about the luck they can't control but there are plenty of ways to harvest luck.
Smart will let you do harder things with less effort. Smart lets you question yourself and what you're doing wrong.
Motion gives you luck. Meet new people, try new things. Don't just optimize for most income, but use your smartness to move faster and further than everyone else. Build 10,000 prototypes. Try new hobbies. Read bigger and thicker books. Reread the same books you have.
Being prepared gives you more luck. Some of the best discoveries were organized messes. Edison discovered the light bulb experimenting with everything - animal hair, 6000 vegetable growths, and finally got it with tungsten. Smart people tend to give up earlier and be neater.
And the last type of luck just happens to you. A friend just offers you a great job. Your first freelancing contract. Getting a hot date to ask you out first. A friend of mine made music as a full time job and worked on 3D game engines as a hobby, and got a dream job doing music for the game industry. This all seems like luck, because it's an unplanned result, but it's the overflow of hard work.
Smart people are a little obsessed with trying to link results directly to an action. To really succeed, you have to keep putting energy and focus into something, even when progress plateaus.
If you are and it's not working then you probably aren't as smart as you think you are.
If that's not what you are optimizing for, be that lifestyle, or pursuit of interests, then there is no reason to expect the two to be correlated.
If you don’t want to work for a boss, then you have to start your own business or work for yourself.
If you want to make more money then you have to decide how much and change your job to accommodate that.
But I am happy with my 9-5 job that provides enough to take care of the people I love.