>Reddit is a Democrat/Chinese Tencent organization with a political agenda. This sub and r/conspiracy and maybe a couple others seem to the only places where at least some discussion is still tolerated.
Regardless of Reddit's sins, this sounds like typical irrational political fighting.
>1.) The modification times on the files point to the use of a FAT file system, which is used almost exclusively by storage devices (such as flash drives).
>2.) Analysis of the files released by Guccifer 2.0 -- claimed to be the Russian hacker who got the files to Wikileaks -- reveals that they were created at a data transfer rate consistent with a flash drive, but not with an internet transfer."
>3.)The NSA would've known the hack was taking place, thanks to the leaks revealed by Edward Snowden, which the NSA has never denied
This logic is worthy of r/itsaunixsystem
I don't personally believe the DNC was hacked by the Russians either, but this is pathetic and falls into the category of "not even wrong."
7 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 30.2 ms ] threadRegardless of Reddit's sins, this sounds like typical irrational political fighting.
>It boils down to these three key points:
>1.) The modification times on the files point to the use of a FAT file system, which is used almost exclusively by storage devices (such as flash drives).
>2.) Analysis of the files released by Guccifer 2.0 -- claimed to be the Russian hacker who got the files to Wikileaks -- reveals that they were created at a data transfer rate consistent with a flash drive, but not with an internet transfer."
>3.)The NSA would've known the hack was taking place, thanks to the leaks revealed by Edward Snowden, which the NSA has never denied
This logic is worthy of r/itsaunixsystem
I don't personally believe the DNC was hacked by the Russians either, but this is pathetic and falls into the category of "not even wrong."
Regarding Reddit censoring the post? I don't go there so don't know enough to comment on that aspect.