I achieved 60 (72% of users will like it) with my side-project[1] which is mostly an artwork, I believe its colorfulness helped the score a lot. I'd love for the algorithm to give me clear indications on what it believes I should improve, e.g. make this button wider, make the image bigger.
Amusingly, from the comments here, it seems like everyone wants some kind of "HotOrNot" service for websites. Crowdsource the ratings! Then you can drop the "A" from "AI" :)
I'm getting visually stunning for https://msb.com but I'm confused does it look only above the fold or the whole site? The screenshots only seem to show the top of the website
The results under "Here are few websites with similar visual scores as yours" were especially amusing for my site.
I've received a score of 26 and the similar websites were:
- Generic unstyled XML Access Denied document.
- Google account log in page.
- Generic unstyled "Your request has been blocked" text.
- "Please verify you're a human" HTML error message.
- Random JSON error message.
I entered my personal website, https://merely.xyz . That website is served with a single request; perhaps it's been classified as an error page because of that?
I tested https://gildas-lormeau.github.io/ (score 56) which is also a single request website. Almost all the websites with similar visual scores are okay for me.
I also got a 26 for a site I entered. It was a bit confusing because 26 happens to be a fixed point, the site gives you a score (26% of users will like your site) and also ranks you among all the sites people have entered (you scored higher than 26% of all sites entered).
My default Apache 404 page got a 38% of users will like it, 26 points for visually average, 20 for visual and 30 for clarity. After a few different URLs, my fail2ban kicked in, and the site complained about the URL being invalid. Fair enough.
Hilariously my blog (kn100.me) also got 38 percent and the site provides screenshots of other sites with similar scores, which were all 404/500 error pages... I thought my blog looked nice :(
Using my somewhat powerful but also flawed neuro net trained on over 20 years of intensive web usage gives your blog design a thumbs up. One suggestion is adding padding-top: 1em to the "Posts" heading to make it more clearly separated from the quick summary above it and more clearly related to the content below it.
its definitely just a handful of scores and a handful of comments that get picked rather randomly. Just count the amount of "72%" posts in the comments here
What's it actually doing under the hood? Just taking a screen grab of the first few hundred vertical pixels x the full width? What's the actual resolution that it's grabbing, and how does the algorithm work and come up with scores? Is the system backed by some sort of data from a representative group of users?
Individual metrics 60/60 means u have fine balance...Algo keeps on refining as it processes more data..scores are just indicative not to taken as absolute basis. Thanks for trying.
Thanks! https://doomlaser.itch.io has a bunch of the free ones. It gets "better than 84% of millions+ websites analysed by Visual MIND AI", with a 90 in "Visual Appearance", whatever that might mean :)
I think I stumbled upon your itch.io page at some point because I remember Shit Game, but never got a chance to really play it, hopefully I can get to play some of these this time, nothing can go wrong with that 90 visual appearance score!
Ah, cool. I think it still holds up. I put some heart into it, anyway.
Of my free games, the most personal and artsy is probably Standard Bits. It premiered at Gamma 256 in Montreal next to Jason Rohrer's Passage, and people have said some nice things about it over the years: https://doomlaser.itch.io/standardbits It takes place on a 100x54 pixel field, blown up to full screen, and you control a single pixel on a journey. Named after the low-level pixel blitter in the original Macintosh toolbox API..
For some reason this one won't start up on my macOS, gave some error dialogs on first time but I didn't get a chance to see what's exactly said, looks like a wine issue though. However I really like what I saw from the short video, I can smell some alternative / interesting gameplay there, it reminds me of some of Michael Brough's games. (I'll try download the windows version and use the maybe newer version of Wind on my system)
More like generate a random number from 30 to 90 and show gibberish data, cool idea though to fool small businesses into improving their visual score and charging money, good gimmick though
I'm not very convinced of this AI. I got 96% for http://peppermind.com and only 68% for https://talumriel.de - I'm almost certain that most users would prefer talumriel, and both scores them seem overrated to me. I mean, I really have no clue about design...
Thanks for this really. I looked it and trust me AI has got this completely wrong ..we will include this as exception when we train again.. thanks for trying..
Mine is supposed to be good looking (score 90), but too complex (score 20). It’s a simple content in the middle + sidebar layouts. Indeed, very complex.
> Visual Mind is an AI engine specifically designed for understanding and scoring visual appearance of a website. Visual Mind has analyzed over a million websites to achieve an accuracy rate of over 97%.
How does accuracy work in a project like this, where the result is subjective?
182 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 239 ms ] threadEdit: Actually, all of the small/personal sites I've tried are failing, though a couple of big names worked. Is this a spoof?
https://myraah.io/index.php/visualmind/report/aHR0cDovL29pa2...
[1]https://bonfiretabletop.com
[1]https://smallsms.app
Well thank you dear AI!
56% of users are expected to like your site
Overall your site has good layout and visuals. You can further improve your score by using more vibrant images.
With only two likes of text, which looks something like
Notes
--------------------------------
Wtire your notes here
I've received a score of 26 and the similar websites were:
- Generic unstyled XML Access Denied document.
- Google account log in page.
- Generic unstyled "Your request has been blocked" text.
- "Please verify you're a human" HTML error message.
- Random JSON error message.
I entered my personal website, https://merely.xyz . That website is served with a single request; perhaps it's been classified as an error page because of that?
Here are few websites with similar visual scores as yours Facebook.com Vogue.com Microsoft.com ... I think I'm in good company.
While my personal blog https://eruci.com is really ugly:
"38% of users are expected to like your site"
Same as "Google.com"
> Your website is better than 72% of millions+ websites analysed by Visual MIND AI
for: http://doomlaser.com
What's it actually doing under the hood? Just taking a screen grab of the first few hundred vertical pixels x the full width? What's the actual resolution that it's grabbing, and how does the algorithm work and come up with scores? Is the system backed by some sort of data from a representative group of users?
I only realized it when trying it on itself : https://myraah.io/index.php/visualmind/report/aHR0cDovL215cm...
Also doesn't work on my website https://gistnoesis.github.io/StlToRelief/
Of my free games, the most personal and artsy is probably Standard Bits. It premiered at Gamma 256 in Montreal next to Jason Rohrer's Passage, and people have said some nice things about it over the years: https://doomlaser.itch.io/standardbits It takes place on a 100x54 pixel field, blown up to full screen, and you control a single pixel on a journey. Named after the low-level pixel blitter in the original Macintosh toolbox API..
Input: https://www.wikipedia.org/ Output: 38% of users are expected to like your site
> Visual Mind is an AI engine specifically designed for understanding and scoring visual appearance of a website. Visual Mind has analyzed over a million websites to achieve an accuracy rate of over 97%.
How does accuracy work in a project like this, where the result is subjective?