Oatly is a successful brand and their marketing is clever, but that doesn't mean they are "The New Coke".
Oatly has never pretended sugar is good for you, it's listed on the box, we all see it. And I don't think they should be put on blast for their use of canola oil of all things..and by the way nobody is drinking it because of the health benefits of that.
The most effective thing they did from a marketing standpoint was an anti-dairy campaign. Their biggest achievement is making people go "Yea... cow's milk is kinda weird, why wouldn't I drink an alternative that tastes just like it".
Coke, cigarettes, sugar campaigns -- They sold you on this idea that life can be more amazing if you just use this product.
Oatly did something different. They said "Hey your life can be about the same as it is now, enjoying dope milk, but without drinking cow's milk like a weirdo". And it worked.
Looks like you're ignoring the main theme here. People do choose oat milk because it is supposed to be a healthier or more sustainable alternative to cow's milk, but the reality is that it could be worse. Ignoring the GI for example is what would make it 'the new coke', like we did for sugar itself in past decades.
I always thought the reason why people choose milk alternatives is they're either vegan or intolerant. Personally I find oat milk the least unappetizing.
> People do choose oat milk because it is supposed to be a healthier or more sustainable alternative to cow's milk, but the reality is that it could be worse.
Surely the environmental costs associated with feeding and raising cows far outweigh whatever environmental impact of Oatly’s plant-based ingredients. Not sure about the health aspect though.
Oat milk is great for vegans or lactose-intolerant people and froths way better than the other non-dairy milks, so I'm not sure where the oat milk => Starbucks jab comes from. Either way, my local coffee shops started carrying oat milk much earlier than Starbucks.
Interesting and well researched post, just a bit too narrowly focused on the health part. What I think is that people don't drink Oatly because of its purported health benefits, but they drink it because it's vegan and that fits their lifestyle.
The canola oil part seems like FUD to me. Of all the oils without taste that is probably one of the better ones. The studies linked doesn't seem great TBH...
> Put a tablespoon of sugar next to your coffee next time you have a chance and seriously consider if that’s a decision that’s “made for humans.”
I sometimes do put a tablespoon of sugar in my coffee. Am I weird? I'm under no impression that it's equivalent to eating a celery and ten pushups, but I'm also not under the impression that it's equivalent to eating deep-fried ice cream, either.
It looks like a packet of sugar is roughly a teaspoon (or 1/3 tablespoon) of sugar, and asking for two packets of sugar with your coffee is pretty common around here. Is three so far beyond the pale?
If you drink one cup of coffee a day, I don't think it's going to be an issue
It's part of a larger picture and genetics also play a large part of it. Drinking one cup of coffee with one tablespoon of sugar is a lower daily intake than six cups of coffee, each with one teaspoon
What can be problematic is if you forget to account for snacks/drinks when/if you consider your health. A tablespoon of sugar would roughly cover 2.5% of my daily energy requirements. If I start drinking three cups of coffee like that every day and continue my regular diet, I'll probably start gaining weight as I'm getting 7.5% more calories by drinking three cups of coffee
If you eat a "deep-fried ice cream" every day, it's probably not healthy for you, but three cups of coffee with a tablespoon of sugar every day, is equivalent of adding a pint of Ben&Jerry's chocolate fudge brownie ice cream to your diet every single week (based on calories) - that's not healthy either
The article hints at the choice of canola oil (popular in Scandinavia) but kind of underscores just how obvious of a choice it was for Oatly. I used to live in Skåne very near to the Oatly factory in Landskrona - there are enormous fields of rapeseed all throughout the area. I imagine that no other oil is nearly as cheap for them as canola.
Tangentially, rapeseed is quite beautiful when it grows. During its growth season it produces beautiful rolling yellow hills in Skåne.
24 comments
[ 4.9 ms ] story [ 68.4 ms ] threadOatly has never pretended sugar is good for you, it's listed on the box, we all see it. And I don't think they should be put on blast for their use of canola oil of all things..and by the way nobody is drinking it because of the health benefits of that.
The most effective thing they did from a marketing standpoint was an anti-dairy campaign. Their biggest achievement is making people go "Yea... cow's milk is kinda weird, why wouldn't I drink an alternative that tastes just like it".
Coke, cigarettes, sugar campaigns -- They sold you on this idea that life can be more amazing if you just use this product.
Oatly did something different. They said "Hey your life can be about the same as it is now, enjoying dope milk, but without drinking cow's milk like a weirdo". And it worked.
Surely the environmental costs associated with feeding and raising cows far outweigh whatever environmental impact of Oatly’s plant-based ingredients. Not sure about the health aspect though.
That’s not a latte; that’s a glass of milk.
> Oatly compares their sugar to the sugar in cow’s milk, but they’re not the same sugar.
This was insightful, though, as it’s a rationalization I’ve made when choosing oat milk but it’s now clear that it was a misguided one.
Boo hoo, its a well recognized product that lends itself to criticism. No need to be dumbfounded by that.
Also,
> Put a tablespoon of sugar next to your coffee next time you have a chance and seriously consider if that’s a decision that’s “made for humans.”
I sometimes do put a tablespoon of sugar in my coffee. Am I weird? I'm under no impression that it's equivalent to eating a celery and ten pushups, but I'm also not under the impression that it's equivalent to eating deep-fried ice cream, either.
It looks like a packet of sugar is roughly a teaspoon (or 1/3 tablespoon) of sugar, and asking for two packets of sugar with your coffee is pretty common around here. Is three so far beyond the pale?
It's part of a larger picture and genetics also play a large part of it. Drinking one cup of coffee with one tablespoon of sugar is a lower daily intake than six cups of coffee, each with one teaspoon
What can be problematic is if you forget to account for snacks/drinks when/if you consider your health. A tablespoon of sugar would roughly cover 2.5% of my daily energy requirements. If I start drinking three cups of coffee like that every day and continue my regular diet, I'll probably start gaining weight as I'm getting 7.5% more calories by drinking three cups of coffee
If you eat a "deep-fried ice cream" every day, it's probably not healthy for you, but three cups of coffee with a tablespoon of sugar every day, is equivalent of adding a pint of Ben&Jerry's chocolate fudge brownie ice cream to your diet every single week (based on calories) - that's not healthy either
Tangentially, rapeseed is quite beautiful when it grows. During its growth season it produces beautiful rolling yellow hills in Skåne.
There is merit to findings that cigarettes act as an appetite suppressant and as such, enable weight loss (or slow weight gain).