Ask HN: Anyone here built successful SaaS/startup just for money?

224 points by aristofun ↗ HN
Is something wrong with me that recently I stopped being excited about tech, products, disruptive ideas, making world better etc.

And just want to make money, as much as possible, don’t care how (as long as it’s legal).

Is it a good start for starting new project in tech world?

Because creating software products is the only thing i can do very well.

But except few small exceptions all my life I’ve been working for companies, exchanging my time for money, building software.

Anyone created profitable and lasting IT business being motivated only by money?

153 comments

[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 235 ms ] thread
I figure most people that have done it and are doing it are doing it 'just for money'

Or 'mostly or primarily for money'

So all the folks on the indie hackers podcast, for instance

In theory Yes. In fact, making money and more importantly: financial Freedom is one of the biggest motivations for starting your own business.

However, I personally am not sure if you can just do a business only for money. Because in practice, you would have to deal with customers, employees/contractors, product, sales, marketing, support tickets, servers going down and a lot of other things that comes as part of running a SAAS business. If you are not learning on a daily basis and investing in knowledge which requires some level of interest in things, you at some point would most likely crash and burn.

So my advice is to be very motivated by money. Nothing wrong with that. But be motivated with other things as well as building a successful business is a journey and a career and that requires a lot of other motivations. For example, building something that you really like. Solving problems that you can help your customers tremendously. Those things can add a lot more to your ability to make lot more money.

I run my own SAAS business and I am not just motivated by money even though it is probably the biggest factor for sure and I am not going to sugarcoat it. But if you look at it, I am running the business because other than financial freedom, I also wanted to create something of my own, put a few people together providing a good product to customers (it really excites me) and many other motivations. I don't know if I can wake up every day and just be excited that I am making money. At some point, you need other things to motivate you.

I'd say freedom is the biggest motivation. In terms of financial freedom it may even be lesser or less secure but many people would still go towards being their own boss for the sake of freedom. And in fact all my friends who got massive investments have barely any freedom now.
Agreed. I think if money is the primary goal, getting a job at a FAANG is a more certain path. Freedom or agency is my biggest motivation.
Yes. In particular because you’ll be more concerned with sales than engineering. And in the end all businesses are sales first.

Find your customers, then build whatever thing they want.

Also, this is sort of a contrived question. No one starts a business saying, “I don’t care about money, I just want to do X.” Because if that we’re true, just go be an employee. It’s much easier to do.

The reverse would be less common, not the question you’re asking.

For example someone had some exceptional product idea they really enjoyed working on, and they happened to stumble on the right people to fund it as a lifestyle business or something greater.

No one starts a business, files the paperwork, opens the bank accounts, purchases the insurance, finds the customers or clients, does the work, hires the laborers, and says, “I didn’t do this for the money.”

Anyone who says otherwise is trying to push “culture” or some other nonsense on you because they want to command your labor.

Wanted to get rid of other's money - I built https://github.com/imvetri/ui-editor to get rid of knowledge accumulation due to web frameworks. Once I did it and shared, I thought more such tools will come.

Patiently watching the community - no real good tool is solving a real problem

If good money and just not breaking the law are two requirements, then looking into certain niches might not be a bad idea.

Google calls these niches "sensitive" https://support.google.com/adsense/answer/3016445?hl=en.

Here's an example, an online poker statistics SaaS making $2.9M Gross/Yr https://feinternational.com/buy-a-website/50471-saas-recurri...

Pretty tangential, but since you mentioned poker I do wonder if the big players are using the data from their players as input to a machine learning model.

It seems like incredibly well labelled data since you know every action taken, and the outcome.

I did, and it boosted my confidence 10x at my day job as a PM.

I still work full-time at another startup (again, I like making money) but now I have a good safety net to fall back on (if required) and I know my opinions can lead to successful outcomes.

Don't you know that you must be motivated by ANYTHING except money? For some reason, money is the only thing that people say that you're not supposed to be motivated by. (being sarcastic)

Yes, you can be motivated solely by money. This is not to say that you can't be motivated by other things, too.

As a matter of fact, besides the elite in a society, most people are motivated solely by money. Example: You live in some crappy little town in the midwest. You have a high school diploma and that's it. There's only one decent employer within 200 miles that has decent jobs and wages. Somehow, you find yourself as a general manager and make $120,000 per year. You have a family with 5 children, in a 5 bedroom home with 5 acres, and you can't move because your wife's parents live nearby and have Alzheimers, so wife needs to stay in that town. You hate your job, can't stand it. But you stay there, at that job, because of the money. And, what are you going to do, move to the Bay Area and pay the $500K you sold your house for and buy a 1 bedroom condo that all 7 family members and the parents are going to live in?

And that's people who are doing well in a situation like that. There's all kinds of people working at McDonalds and Walmart solely for the money. Probably most of the USA.

Being happy in your job and motivated by it and fulfilled by it: first world problems of the elite in the first world.

So, yes, it is ok to be motivated only by money.

And I tell you what. If you work in a business that is fulfilling and you make $25K per year, but start selling cookware, which is, eh, average in your opinion, but start making $10 million per year, somehow, most people are going to start liking cookware a lot more and really get into it. For some mysterious reason.

And remember, you never want to be the CEO of a company. No you do not. You might have to start off that way, but eventually you should always hire a CEO or general manager if it is a smaller company. You want to be the Chair of the Board. Like Warren Buffet. He's not at Geico every day answering the phones or doing the actuarial tables. He just owns the stocks. I know a LOT of business owners that only come in for an hour or two each week, and let their GM do the grind.

Probably 99% of non-tech professionals start business to make money. Do you think your plumber started his business thinking of making the world a better place? Highly unlikely except for HIS own world.

Yes, do it for the money.. it’s OK.

This applies to 99% of businesses started by tech professionals too. There is nothing nobler or kinder about tech businesses. All those "mission statements" are just pure fluff for PR purposes.
It can be both. There is no mission without money.
Just wanted to chime in from the supposed 1% as someone who isn’t running a business earn money but earn money in order to continue running the business. A business building something I’m passionate about, with the addition of an end goal I expect will make the world a better place.
> There is nothing nobler or kinder about tech businesses. All those "mission statements" are just pure fluff for PR purposes.

true, but would it be wrong to assume that the following ratio:

(the number of people who are passionate about xyz and curiosity and pure joy are major driving forces) / (total number of people working in xyz)

is probably much higher for cs than for plumbing?

I only want to hire a plumber with passion, who is making the world a better place one clogged drain at a time. Haven’t been able to find one yet but I’m still looking.
> I only want to hire a plumber with passion, who is making the world a better place one clogged drain at a time.

Don't know about the passion, but they really are making the world a better place, one clogged drain at a time.

Plumbing, building, electrics all require understanding the current state of the system (eg: house that 20 different cowboys have messed with over the years), and weighing up the different possible solutions - sure there is a measure of simple/straightforward work, but same can be said of software engineering.

We work in a different medium, but at a high level I think the process can look very similar, and there's satisfaction in a job well done

I'd have guessed, most CS people would do OSS and only a fraction of them turns these projects into products.

I met too many business people who just wanted to run a startup no matter if it was software or physical products.

Doing plumbing for fun is like parsing old logs as a hobby. But plenty of people do woodwork,metalwork, bread-making, brewing, etc for fun.
Being 'passionate and curious' have nothing to do necessarily with 'making the world a better place'.

If anything it's kind of a personal issue.

Surely most scientific discovery comes along with passion and curiosity, so there's some overlap there, but most work doesn't get done out of either of those things. Most of the things that move the ball forward are a grind.

It's probably the same. Some CS people like to work on side projects. So do a lot of plumbers by renovating their homes or tinkering with other stuff in their spare time.
> Do you think your plumber started his business thinking of making the world a better place?

For the tradespeople I have known, the answer is yes. They also like getting paid, of course. But they find satisfaction in making the world better one sink at a time. Otherwise spending 40 years as plumber would be an absolutely miserable experience.

You believe a person cannot find satisfaction in a job well done (and a solid paycheck), they have to "change a world" to feel accomplished?

I found the documentary "Jiro dreams of sushi" illustrative (in the opposite extreme). I believe most of us would fall somewhere in between (... aaaand, we get to Maslow again :)

That's the exact opposite of what I'm saying.

If by "change the world" you mean narcissistic grandiosity about being in the history books, yeah, that's generally ridiculous. But small things also change the world. Raising kids. Installing sinks. Fixing roofs. Serving a meal. All of these things make the world a little better.

This is distinct from what Graeber called "bullshit jobs". Making sure that you use the new cover sheet on the TPS report that nobody will read, for example. Some people are happy doing bullshit. But trades have the appeal of doing something undeniably real, undeniably beneficial.

So yes, as I said, I believe that somebody who started a solo plumbing business is absolutely thinking of making the world a better place. And I think they do it every day.

Their work is also immediately real and beneficial. A plumber friend told me a story the other day. Over the winter a woman's water inlet pipes had frozen. She was without water for two or three days and when they got her pipes flowing again she was so happy that she cried.
Most people will find a certain level of satisfaction in a job if it's well done. I don't think there are many people who perform reasonably at their job while not being satisfied with a job well done.
Yes absolutely. They enjoy and take pride of their work. But did they start their business with the idea of "making the world a better place" and then went on to trade school? I'm not saying these two things are opposite of each other, but most people start businesses so they can make money to bring food on the table at the end of the day.
Ok but there is still a difference between someone who works as a plumber and someone who starts their own plumbing business.

Absolutely, making more money is a big motivator for entrepreneurs across the board, including plumbing entrepreneurs.

If that's the case, I expect a lot of entrepreneurs end up disappointed. Quite a lot of solo proprietors end up working more for less. But when I talk with people, it's generally not money that really motivates them. It's a sense of freedom or ownership.
Plumbers don’t need to speculate that they might make the world a better place.
if your toilet is stuck? he fixes it. certainly the plumbers make the world a better place....

btw. think about a b2b business. think about an erp software. there is lots or room for specializing, just like the businesses you will make it for. i run an engineering an production company, and just because there was nothing there, we made our own. i am happy to share it, leave me a message if interested.

My point was that a plumber’s impact on making the world a better place is obvious.
Plumbers do make the world a better place though and unlike software engineers almost no plumbers make it a worse place.
That's nonsense. A bad plumber can make people's lives hell in a way a software engineer probably can't. Some software engineers may have more leverage than plumbers but in the end most of us just try to survive in a world that's shaped by a few powerful people.
If someone is bad or evil in any profession it might make the world a worse place.
You say that like it's a unique thing to software engineers.

In the cases you're probably thinking that should include, the marketers, sales people, operations staff, recruiters, and basically anyone else who keeps the business running.

You either think software engineers are so powerful as to effect the direction of these large businesses, in which case, you're wrong.

Or that somehow people earning a better living for themselves given the current climate which is almost uniformly stacked against the standard worker is wrong.

I think you should step back and look at the actual causes like their boards, investors and senior management as well as the government.

To note I say this with a clear conscience since I've never worked at any of the Big Co's at this point in time by choice.

No, But i'll bet you the plumber who does not absolutely love going under the sink each day has money and is miserable. The one who enjoys telling you the anatomy of your sink when you didn't ask (you know the type) those guys don't even care about the money, they just love what they do
You need to differentiate between making an income and making a profit.

SaaS is a resource sharing problem. If you can share the resources between different customers effectively it would be possible to make a profit once you scale up efficiently.

The technical problem is to build the software to be hyper efficient and scalable. The business problem is to acquire enough repeat customers.

Most startups are focused on speed to market or investor driven growth. Neither of which really helps the core problems

I am the opposite. I left a profitable business despite the money. I wanted to do something that for myself, developing my skills and satisfying.
What was the business about and why it didn’t let you develop skills etc?
I've built several successful SaaS/DaaS startups since I quit my last job back in 2005; mostly just for freedom. (money too I guess)
Do you think this can be done as a solo dev/founder, or do you eventually need more than 1 person (and when does that "eventually" occur in your experience)?

Also do you have thoughts on bootstrapping your SaaS versus getting funding for additional hires?

I'm still single founder for most of my businesses - although it has drawbacks.

I've never looked for nor accepted funding. Freedom is my main motivation, and it is limited somehow when you accept money. And for complete freedom you must go it alone.

In my latest project however (poidata.xyz) I'm a co-founder.

I went to checkout your profile as I was interested in seeing what products you've made, and I saw on your website you've got a mailto link. I was thinking of adding the same thing to my site, but I'm worried about crawlers picking up my email and using it for spam. Has this happened to you at all - do you get much spam?
I suppose. I have a pretty good spam filter however.
Might be worth stepping back and thinking about why you want to make money. Money is a store of opportunity but useless in itself. If you were to be shipwrecked with no hope of rescue would you rather be washed up with a cargo container of dollar bills or camping gear?

So what is it you really want? What are you hoping the money will buy you?

This is insightful at first glance, but throw out the shipwrecked part, and you cover a 99% coverage of scenarios where being in a cargo container full of money would provide tremendous value over a cargo container filled with camping gear.

Thus, having more money in itself will provide a tremendous hedge and perform as a greater value above and beyond other alternatives.

The original poster says, "I want to make money". OK, if they were handed $1B what would they do with it? What do they really want? Physical security? Financial security? Political influence? Love? Hedonism? Existential meaning?

The shipwreck analogy is a tool to help you understand that you want money for what you can do with it, not for itself.

Extra points if you make some discoveries about yourself when asking why you want these things.

At a point in my life I treated my income per month as game score for many years, I guess it will be category of hedonism ?
It seems like this and parent intriguing comments are both skirting(?) the importance of -context- in the debate over "money" vs "better world". People from all walks of life may choose one or the other based on their status,philosophy,etc. Overall though, I think the ability to choose "better world" comes from a more privileged place, which might make the "crate full of money" enable a more people to choose "better world" more frequently.
Ignoring the “no hope” clause and in the spirit of entertainment: some napkin math has a 40ft shipping container holding around $60m in dollar bills. People would look a lot harder for that than camping gear!
Does «provide decent quality of life for my family and freedom for me” sound good enough?
If you start something but are unlikely to make good money, and your only motivator is to make money, then it will be though. Start your sales/marketing at day one, eg. try to sell your SaaS before you start developing, have at least two customers at day one, don't have to be paying customers (unless you are more of a consult), but they should at least be committed to beta testing. I spent 3 years making a product, which turned out to be impossible to sell...
It depends on your personality. Some people can live without a calling. I can’t.

What helps me a lot is to review the Ikigai attributed framework regularly and to think which of the dimensions is important for me and who I do currently along them:

1. What are you good at?

2. What do you enjoy doing?

3. What is paid money for?

4. What is good for the planet?

My focus is on 1-3.

"What is good for the planet" sounds related to eco-activism; but Ikigai asks "What does the world need?"
Yeah fair enough. What does the world need sounds similar to the money point in my opinion.

btw: Ikigai doesn’t say anything about that. The framework is made up and referenced to Ikigai by a western dude as far as I know.

> btw: Ikigai doesn’t say anything about that

Sorry, I was misled by the Venn diagrams people make.

It is an interesting distinction. Doing work that is valuable to other people is a key way to make sure you can keep working successfully. Fighting all the people to convince them to do something different to save themselves from bad long term problems is ethical but possibly less likely to lead to success, even in the non—monetary, people are happy you exist fashion. So making yourself useful to other people isn’t the same exactly as do what pays well, but it can lead to the sort of “not a passion but enables a good life” situations. People that seek to save us from ourselves are super necessary but also have a tendency to burn out. We all need to try to make our society a few percent better each year for the long term problems and then the zealots can relax a bit.
if you could cure disease just for the money I don't think anyone would hold it against you.
Actually, people hold that against companies all the time, most notably pharmaceutical companies.

The devil is in the details. People don't like when they feel like you are "milking" your cure "too much". And "too much" is relative.

Most of the time if it work you are making something people want, thus money is a proxy for usefulness to someone.

I think that money is often a poor motivator past some point, it’s like food, once you are satiated food loose it’s interest. But making something useful stay and keep on growing.

Paul Graham said in an interview the reason he built his first startup was for money.

Honestly though, as someone who focused on money the first ten years of their career, your best bet is to grind leetcode and get into FAANG or become an excellent sales person. You’ll make more money in 90% of cases then starting your own business.

I personally don’t think there’s anything wrong with focusing on money. I’m at the point in my life where I care more about time than money, but saving up 7 years worth of California adtech money then moving to a low cost of living country gave me a different perspective.

My question to you….. did you START with passion drive enthusiasm and a sense of inherent drive? Has that now been replaced with the desire to succeed primarily for money?

If yes than that’s fine.

Maybe it’s even good, or better than your previous motivations.

You’re on the right path. The thing about “making the world better” is that it isn’t getting better, no matter what we do. However, you can still make your own world better, and an important part of that is money. Not just for yourself, but for your descendants as well.
Money is the end goal, but status[1], pleasure and upgrading my skills are necessary side goals. “From a million dollars, everything is your passion” (Joel on Software).

[1] Moderate status, I have humor telling everyone “I’m a CEO” (like Zuckerberg), given I only have 2 employees and had none for long.

I abhorre companies who pretend their IT will change humanity. Participating to the economy is already a great satisfaction for me, because the sum of our work built a civilization. In fact, I have ads in my office with the stupid phrases of competitors: “We advance humanity”, “Building the future since 125 years” etc.

I’ve built a product on the Atlassian Marketplace and it was a great place to innovate. Perhaps it still is, but Atlassian deprecates frameworks as soon as your stack is up, and their new Forge thingy is too locked down to build any smart app.

> I abhorre companies who pretend their IT will change humanity

I mean technically they're right, in that their IT might change humanity by 0.000000000000000000002% (if it can be measured at all)...

Link to the Joel On Software article you're referencing?
The funny thing is when I googled that phrase I got another Hacker News thread from the same user quoting the same line. It might have been from an event or something.
To my shame, you are correct, the quote is nowhere to be found. It’s not either from Paul Graham. I thought it was a famous quote & concept among us entrepreneurs…

I vividly remember a blog from Joel saying things along Why are entrepreneurs passionate for things that seem very niche? / The truth is, once they succeed, they become passionate / So we have a bias of selection when assuming that all entrepreneurs are passionate about their product.

But this post is nowhere to be found. I thought the quote was the title of that blog post.

I have to make amend and recognize that I might be senile and spreading a false quote. Thank you for waking me up.

All good, the sentiment is very much shared amongst entrepreneurs and fortunately spreading after the whole “follow your passion” BS.

Lots of successful people nowadays now say “do what you’re good at” or “do the unsexy things, or the things no one else wants to do” and the passion will follow. That’s a much more pragmatic and realistic approach.

Personally I really enjoyed software and coding, but after doing the grind at SV companies and my own gig I’ve come to realize that on a risk-adjusted basis, the larger tech companies are a better way to make money.

> “From a million dollars, everything is your passion” (Joel on Software).

That can certainly be true before you get million dollars. Is it still true afterwards?

I decided to leave my job as a CEO of a midsized company to build my own business. Although I always wanted to create my own innovative product, I decided to swim with the wales - big software vendors - to add (and catch) some value there. The reason: quick profits. That plan worked out quite well. However, money is like pure water. You need it to be alive and if you're having none you want all of it. But if you're having a steady inflow that's big enough, one day you won't want to go the extra mile for another glass. You want Pepsi instead! Okay, just kidding, you want Coke most likely... However, you'll be better of working on something that fascinates you instead of just going for the money. Maybe you're good in starting things up but you hate to keep them going. Why not concentrate on the first part then? Build & sell. Maybe you hate customer development and just want to get a high income managing stuff and doing politics. Apply for a job at an enterprise then. Do it like a scientist: formulate a hypothesis about what really makes you happy and what system you have in place to realize that happiness. Collect evidence, optimize the system. Maybe read "Business Model You" and "Design The Life That You Love". At least I'm doing that now to figure out what the next years of my life should be about. Not just money I guess. Money often comes at the intersection of chance and excellence. And excellence often comes from something aligned to your talents & interests.
I'm fascinated by your comment. I'm making a few assumptions from the "CEO of midsized company" and "quick profits" plan that "worked out quite well" about you.

It's awesome to see that it worked for you but I think some of us (maybe the OP included) are still pursuing the "steady inflow that's big enough". For me is quite concrete, getting rid of student loans and mortgage. At that point my monthly expenses would be sub-$1k, which makes pursuing something that fascinates me a lot more feasible.

Thus I come out with a critique and a question... It seems to me that the advice to work on something that "fascinates you" would be a stage two since there could be circumstance that do require just going for the money.

The question then is, how did you made it swimming with the big whales? Was is knowledge that you had/acquired as a CEO? I've been looking more and more into "boring business" as in, not innovative or trying to change the world, but instead capture some of the profit that some huge vendors/industries are already moving, you know, where 5 or 6 figures is petty cash, but I'm not really sure where to look.

Again, props to you on getting to a place that I'm hoping to get myself :-)

Yes, of course. Money is the goal of the business because the business isn't the goal of life.

I've always approached work as a way to maximize my free time, meaning I want to extract the maximum value from as little work as possible. The goal being to spend the rest of the time doing the fun stuff.

SaaS is a great way to deal with this because once the product is built you can ramp down your involvement in it to nearly zero. Other gigs I've had, when I stop doing work, they stop sending me money. SaaS doesn't have that problem. I can answer a few emails in the morning then if the sun is shining I can head off and do whatever I like with the day. Problem solved.

So yes, the business is all about extracting the most money for the least effort. Because I have more important things to do.

Well said. I’ll take this one step further: Anyone who starts a business without putting profitability as one of the top priorities is going to have a hard time.

In fact, it can be disappointing to some engineers to learn how much starting a business requires using off-the-shelf solutions instead of rolling your own implementation and even making compromises with “good enough” code to get things shipped. The entrepreneurs who want to design and code every part of the system by themselves and only ship it when it’s absolutely perfect are the ones who struggle to ever ship a product and get customers.

Social media, HN included, has perhaps skewed public perceptions about things like money, profit, capitalism, and nebulous concepts like “passion”. There’s nothing wrong with starting a business as a business and treating the code as business decisions. In fact, it’s what you want to do if your goal is to get customers and make profit, and there’s nothing wrong with that.

> as one of the top priorities

What if it’s the only priority? How would your answer change?

(comment deleted)
The goal of a business is not to make Money.

Money to a business is like oxygen to to a person. A business cannot survive without money, the body cannot survive without oxygen. So does that mean the goal of life is to breathe?

Make sure you are breathing and go out there and change the world

Make sure your business is financially healthy and focus on getting it to make a dent in the Universe.

Money is a good motivator but can’t be the only one, in my opinion. Because you need something to keep you going even when there is no money coming in yet, or it stops flowing (e.g. you lose a large client).
Something not in the comments yet - many people who are motivated by money build businesses around money, the finance sector.

It's a way to stick to what you're interested in, and makes it fairly easy to 'keep score' if your goals are measured in $€¥£. I get the impression too that being close to flows of money often gives good opportunities to make a cut.

There’s nothing wrong about that, but if you crunch the numbers - or look at the results of people who did - you’ll see that from a purely cashflow perspective, founding a startup is probably not a good idea compared to a traditional career in existing enterprises.
This is why I work multiple remote development jobs. If one traditional job is good, > 1 is better. It would take a quite a successful SaaS to pull down what I do annually.
Multiple full time jobs at the same time? Kudos for pulling that of... though, as a founder hiring remote people from time to time, this is also a bit terrifying.
If they get your work done, don't worry about it. If on they other hand you don't know what the work is you want done, and expect a developer to come in and do it all, don't worry. We moonlighting devs won't even apply for your job.