I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA
I'll be here for the next 2.5 hours and then again at around 11:30 am PST for another 2.5 hours. As usual, there are lots of possible topics and I'll be guided by whatever you are concerned with. Please remember that I can't provide legal advice on specific cases for liability reasons because I won't have access to all the facts. Please stick to a factual discussion in your questions and comments and I'll try to do the same in my answers!
Previous threads we've done: https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=proberts.
348 comments
[ 4.9 ms ] story [ 245 ms ] threadAs I understand, once USCIS approves a petition, it goes to NVC where paperwork is checked to be documentary qualified and then consular interviews are scheduled.
Is there a difference between the 2? Asking because ultimately both are responsible for issuing GC’s.
That explains it.
(on a larger scale as best as you can tell, rather than just an uptick in personal business)
So are you still "YC Startups" then, or were the previous two typos by omission of 'and'?
1. Prepare for USCIS to visit your home. They want to see if you're really working ;). I had someone come and showed her around. Make sure you have a designated "office space" in the house. This was in 2012 or 2013 so I'm not sure if they still do it.
2. Obviously, if you're applying for your green card, then recruitment happens country-wide as opposed to just being in your local zone. At least this is what my lawyers said (again around 2012-2013 :) ).
Obviously my question doesn't apply to in-office or hybrid positions, only to pure remote.
That's not entirely true - several European countries offer "Digital Nomad" visas that are specifically aimed at attracting people who won't take jobs in their host country, but will instead receive income from elsewhere and spend it in their host country, thus boosting their host country's economy.
See: https://www.etiasvisa.com/etias-news/digital-nomad-visas-eu-...
If you partnered with the right European law firms, you could totally offer a nice package of US based salary + assistance with "Digital Nomad" visa application.
I was worried that PERM cannot be filed for remote employees but that doesn't appear to be an issue.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=5bddb770-63de...
You've been talking into a void.
Unfortunately, this also means we have to make guesses when there isn't much information to go on, and that leads to false positives. Your account looks like one of those, since it went on to participate on HN in a good way. I'm sorry about that—we always correct these situations when we see them, but sometimes it takes time before we see them.
I've unbanned the account now, so everything should be fixed. If you need anything else, email us at hn@ycombinator.com.
Btw, it's better to let us know at hn@ycombinator.com about cases like this so we can be sure to fix them. I only saw this randomly. We're grateful when users watch out for each other and we're always happy to unban accounts when it's clear that they're using HN as intended.
(Detached from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29200985)
I'm an Indian in the US on an H1B visa and working in software. I've also made a product for fun on weekends (which my company knows about and approves of).
I was thinking of opening access to it for the world, but as it'll involve substantial costs on (cloud) infrastructure, I'll have to ask people to pay for usage on it. I don't plan to profit from this in any way right now. People will mostly pay for their share of usage.
From some rough googling (oh, no!), it seems like this wouldn't work under the rules of the H1B as it'd be considered unauthorized work. Is there any legitimate way of giving people access to this without having to also just pay for all the infrastructure myself?
Also would it be fine to just release it for free?
Or would you recommend reaching out to an attorney to do this instead?
You may not see why, but that's you conveying your opinion based on common sense or your own reasoning vs the law.
The law says that your H1B via only covers you to receive income via your W2 employment with the company the visa is attached to.
If you are an H1B holder you can't be employed or contracted to work for another company in your home country/another country outside the USA because you would still be performing the work in the US and you are out of visa. Even if it's your own company.
If you put this income on your tax return you will be disclosing to the government you are working outside your visa. If you don't put this income on you tax return you are filing an incomplete tax return (and still working outside your visa).
The difference here from receiving investment or rental income from abroad (which you still have to include on your US tax return!) is that investment and rental income isn't 'work' covered by an employment visa.
A work visa is a permission to take a job out of the US employment pool, and the flaw in the law is that if you are working on your own company (inc side project) abroad, you are not really taking a job out of the US market because you wouldn't have hired anyone anyway. But it's a corner case and the law isn't built around corner cases.
(IANAL)
> A work visa is a permission to take a job out of the US employment pool, and the flaw in the law is that if you are working on your own company (inc side project) abroad, you are not really taking a job out of the US market because you wouldn't have hired anyone anyway.
Exactly. Hence 'I don't see why'. Not legal advice. An opinion that it's (assuming true) dumb. I don't see what the problem is with expressing that opinion on these 'opinion led forums'.
- Owning companies is totally fine. - Generating income from various sources is totally fine.
What is not allowed is: - You should not work in any capacity where an American citizen could have been gainfully employed. Lot of people mis-represent is that you can not get paid a salary, that is not true. Salary is just an evidence of you worked.
How many people structure this is the following. Partner with an American citizen and start the business. The American partner will hold 51% stake and you will be a passive investor with 49%. If you are married you can apply for H4EAD. You spouse has unconditional EAD and she can run the company.
Important note: This issue is only for people born in India. Everyone else can get their EAD/GC in an year or so.
Only if they want to get paid in any way, right? Can a person run their company w/o drawing any profits (i.e. no W-2 needed) and not have to go through the visa process? If I were to look for a way out of the situation ("I want people to pay so that I have money to maintain the infrastructure"), this is how I'd try to approach it ("create an entity that is allowed to accept money from other sources and use that money only to run the infrastructure").
PayPal had to explicitly ban the use of the word "Donation" for non-tax-exempt companies for instance.
I don't think calling the contributions donations will change much and it may actually complicate the payments for tax reasons.
2/ When will Canada and Mexico allow that?
PS: It seems impossible to get an appointment in my home country.
All in all, this should definitely be manageable.
The Philippines hadn't fully opened to tourists so in July of this year we entered the USA with the intention of getting married and then applying for a marriage based visa to the Philippines for me so I could return with my wife. After we entered the USA the Philippines went back into stricter covid related lockdown and we found out there was a 9 month wait time for the visa I would need to be able to return.
Given these issues we decided to stay in the USA and go through the AOS process for my wife instead. My wife entered on a normal tourist visa, this was her third visit to the USA since we had visited my family here a few times while we lived in Manila prior to being married.
Based on my understanding we may have issues with immigration since they will assume my wife entered the USA on a non-immigrant visa with immigration intent. Especially since we go married within a month of entering the USA.
Is there anything we can do to mitigate the chance of a denial based on these circumstances?
Thanks for doing this again. Is a work authorization visa (TN H1B etc) required to be hired for a remote US position for a Canadian not looking to relocate just yet.
Thanks
I am the foreign contractor in this situation and I like it. I wish many more companies would hire this way, since a real FTE would require the company to establish a presence in my country (which will never happen).
I understand the risks of hiring as contractor with an employee-like agreement if I was in the US. But I am not. So what are the risks then?
* He/she is employed by a US company as a contractor and works remotely
* He/she is not a US citizen and lives outside the US
* In the day to day work and team culture, there seems to be no difference between employees and contractors
Basically the benefit to the client company is that it lifts the burden of employment/taxation questions from them. The benefit for you is that since you now own a proper company, you have more tools to manage your finances, for example your company could conceivably pay for office expenses, effectively making those purchases pre-tax (as opposed to paying yourself the equivalent amount and being subject to income tax deductions).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_employer_organiza...
Is it possible to just export services as a sole proprietor without forming a company?
I'm a founder of a Canadian corp looking to move to the US. We have a subsidiary in the US already