What are the Open Source startups?
I'd like that to change. Partly because I want to share what (little) I know about Open Source startups that I've scraped together over the last few years. But also because I need to know for myself. I want to learn. And finally, because I think that commercial open source is an important part of the software landscape, and that commercial open source companies need to start somewhere.
I'll have some news coming soon on that front, but for now, a question: what are the cool Open Source startups you know of? Singly? Couchbase? 10gen? Eucalyptus? AppFog? I'm less interested in companies that "use Open Source", or "make a lot of contributions to Open Source", and more interested in ones where Open Source is a key part of their business strategy.
Any help appreciated!
20 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 47.8 ms ] threadBoth seem to make most of their money through consultancy rather than development and support, but I think that's quite common in the open-source world?
And, of course, you missed out the most obvious one, Red Hat, who do huge amounts of open source work.
While it's now pretty old (1999), the essay "How Red Hat Software Stumbled Across a New Economic Model and Helped Improve an Industry" written by Robert Young of Red Hat was really informative to me. http://oreilly.com/openbook/opensources/book/young.html
http://code.google.com/p/screwpile
https://github.com/Fogbeam
There is x264 LLC which dual-licenses the x264 encoder and pays back royalties to developers. - http://x264licensing.com/
I run Open Broadcast Systems which is a "corporate face" of the Open Broadcast Encoder, an open source broadcast television encoder designed to replace $40k+ hardware broadcast encoders. - http://www.ob-encoder.com/
There is also Anevia, which is sort of the VLC spinoff. They specialise in IPTV playout. - http://www.anevia.com/
Fluendo do something similar for Open Codecs - http://www.fluendo.com/
In short, we pay the bills using the bounty model. Firstly, to develop the core apps (http://ica-atom.org and http://archivematica.org). Secondly, to enhance, integrate, host them, etc. Early on I based much of our business model and community building philosophy on Drupal service providers.
This is a relatively small niche market. We're not getting rich but managing to pay the bills on a break-even basis and being a positive influence in the archives and library community. Since 2006 we've gone from 1 full-time to 8 full-time staff.
As for challenges, our projects are taking off worldwide right now so one of our main issues is juggling a growing demand for free community technical support with putting in the time necessary to hit deliverable milestones on paid client contracts. It's also difficult (impossible?) for us to get external private or public funding to accelerate development/marketing/training because "you don't have any intellectual property. What's to stop a former employee or competitor from stealing your business?" (the answer, of course, is 'our reputation and expertise')
One of our other main challenges is that we usually get organizations to sponsor new features but it is very difficult to get funding for bug fixes, enhancements and any critical core re-factoring. We bite the bullet on those because we need to stay competitive. The leap of faith you make with implementing an open-source business model is that the goodwill is paid forward. If 100 organizations download our software and five come back to us for support services we continue to move forward. This is working for us. For the past 4 years we have solid contract work booked at least 6 months in advance.