Ask HN: Anyone else quickly losing confidence in Amazon?

492 points by d23 ↗ HN
I feel like every time I search for something I expect the products to be either fake, filled with fake reviews, broken when I receive them, or from a no-name fake brand that popped up last week. It has become seemingly impossible to wade through the mess.

What's worse, there seems to be zero way to report these listings. I tried submitting a review warning other customers about the fake reviews for a fake product, but the review was not approved. In that particular instance, I was actively recommended a "wasp trap" by Amazon. Curious, I saw it was rated 4.8.

Turns out the positive reviews were all for... a pet cemetery headstone (complete with photos, to make the issue completely unambiguous). The listing itself was posted by a seller that had almost all negative reviews that were -- removed by Amazon! The reason? Amazon took responsibility, since it was fulfilled by Amazon. The problem: none of the negative reviews had anything to do with things like shipping time. They were all basically calling the product a scam.

This seems like a looming disaster for Amazon. It baffles me that there is no way for customers to at least report these issues. I've done most of my shopping for the last 15 years on Amazon, but I'm seriously considering stopping. Is anyone else in this boat?

323 comments

[ 4.4 ms ] story [ 282 ms ] thread
Maybe you're searching for, or selecting and purchasing, the wrong items?
Yes - same as going to the dollar store (or whatever one’s local equivalent is) and wondering why the cookies taste different.

Also re-stated as, “You can’t handle the truth”, i.e., given the widest possible exposure to consumerism ever known, one is unable to make an informed choice. That is exclusively the responsibility of the consumer.

A mass marketplace is based on trust. Amazon is cannibalising that trust. It will cannibalise its mass marketplace.

If the dollar store is selling product labeled as premium-quality which is not in fact, or is claiming certifications not actually granted, or contaminated products ... then that store has a problem.

At least when going to a B&M store, it's possible to examine goods and packaging and reject obviously damaged or returned merchandise. Amazon doesn't offer that protection except through a far more tedious return mechanism.

Caveat emptor is NOT in fact governing law and principle, but rather implied warranty is, within the US and most Western countries:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implied_warranty

Fora long time now I’ve been using Amazon as a product search site with reviews (sometimes questionable). when I find the product I want to purchase, I try to purchase from the OEM, though sometimes they just direct me back to Amazon
It is a huge marketplace, so I would expect there to be a few bad apples. Overall, I would say 70-80% of the stuff I buy does the job.
The issue there is that there is 20-30% chance of being disappointed. That’s far to high to justify for most people, I would estimate my threshold for confidence when purchasing something needs to be >95%.

I now only ever buy from Amazon if I’m stuck for time and need it quickly / don't have 10 min to shop around.

That is a terrible batting average!
Google: what is a good batting average

Answer: .300

In modern times, a season batting average of .300 or higher is considered to be excellent, and an average higher than .400 a nearly unachievable goal.

Do you rate heart surgeons with the same numbers?
I feel like you're several years late to the party here. I think it's pretty common knowledge at this point that certain types of goods sold on Amazon have a huge chance of being counterfeit and everyone knows reviews are faked/not to be trusted blindly.

At this point people seem to not care since Amazon will give a refund/exchange pretty much no questions asked. It's still extremely annoying and it's definitely not a good look for their business, but I assume the number crunchers have determined actually dealing with the fraud isn't yet worth it financially.

> It's still extremely annoying and it's definitely not a good look for their business, but I assume the number crunchers have determined actually dealing with the fraud isn't yet worth it financially.

They’ve dealt with it in limited ways. For example, they’ve inked exclusivity agreements with certain brands (ex. Apple) so that only Amazon can sell them. So at least that inventory should be legit as they don’t allow third party sellers.

Of course this is somewhat to Amazon’s favor. If a brand is concerned about their reputation due to customers unknowingly getting counterfeits, they need to strike a deal with Amazon, and likely one that is favorable to Amazon.

As a consumer, I didn't know that, and would just assume Apple products on Amazon are also likely to be counterfeit and just buy from Apple or a retailer I trust to have genuine Apple products, like Best Buy.
I can weed out products with massive fake reviews by the stars distribution.

It's a subjective heuristic I developed informally. Never formalized anything statistical.

Just looking at the ration between 5 through 1 stars, I have a high confidence judging whether they bought fake reviews or not.

I also like to look at the two and four star reviews. 5 are obviously bought, 1 could just as easily be an irrational customer, and 3 may just be people who feel lukewarm. Well written 2 and 4 star reviews seem to have the greatest number of people attempting to approach the review objectively.
I can weed out products with massive fake reviews by the stars distribution.

It's a subjective heuristic I developed informally. Never formalized anything statistical.

Just looking at the ratio between 5 through 1 stars, I have a high confidence judging whether they bought fake reviews or not.

I actually suspect something different is happening.

Local optimization beats global optimization. It's why Google went to the crapper too after it reached some number of employees. With 100+k people, no one cares about Google, but about their success within Google.

Someone at Amazon is meeting their short-term objectives and getting their bonus. "The brand" suffering is much more amorphous and harder to translate to a KPI.

Interesting thougth about organisation growth.
A practice I've seen in asset management firms:

(1) To assume high level roles, you must invest $LARGE_SUM_OF_MONEY in funds managed by the company.

(2) After leaving, you get back your money after $FAIR_AMOUNT_OF_YEARS. That's done as an incentive for folks to think long term.

Not sure how you could do that in a company as large as G or A though.

That’s what getting paid in equity is for. If you burn the company down, your salary declines. Of course at 100k people, your impact is small unless you’re a VP+.
Google is doing fine.

Google Search seems to be in decline but that has more to do with the slow death of the open internet than with any sort of internal issues at Google.

Google is in the same stage as Microsoft in the year 2000. It has a lot of cash cows, and is making piles of dollars from them. However, it's lost:

- the ability to engineer good products

- reputation

In the early '00s, most of the really competent people went to Google. Right now, most of the really competent people I know avoid Google, and it's sort of a second choice employer.

It has a lot of market power, but it's increasingly vulnerable.

The cost structure there doesn't help. High salaries+benefits / fewer employees was a good call. High salaries / 100+k employees is less competitive.

I can't predict the future, but I've been bearish on Google for a while.

I think it’s less about organisation size but it is everything about following the money.

Google search is worse because their revenue model requires optimising returns for their advertising arm, not for making a better end-user product. Shareholders demand it (in fact, this problem has a lot more to do with a public listing than team size).

The same is true of Amazon. Amazon’s shopping experience is worse because it is more profitable to be a logistics front-end for a million dropshippers selling specialised goods from tiny Chinese factories. The brakes are off and everyone with any influence over the company is incentivised to make the company more “efficient” (profitable).

Amazon is now a collection of businesses, including:

- AWS - Amazon Ads - FBA - Marketplace

This is in order of profitability. It seems that Amazon doesn't care much about the Marketplace itself.

AWS is the only one not heavily dependent on the quality of the marketplace, which is what brings people to the website though. Seems short sighted to let it drop in quality.
I buy stuff from Amazon several times per week. There are whole swaths of items I won’t buy on there though - anything food related or personal care for two examples.

I’ve had too many incidents of improperly handled or expired food being sent to me or outright fake / gray market things.

It’s hard to lose confidence in a company overall though with such an amazingly easy and liberal return policy.

You aren't going to lose confidence in a company that has "whole swaths of items I won't buy" because of personal experience with being shipped expired food and obvious fakes? What would it take for you to lose confidence?

Unfortunately, there are a lot of things that are difficult to source outside of Amazon, so while I avoid any company whose co-mingling policy pretty much guarantees fakes, sometimes you just have to take your chances. Day Two can't come quickly enough, as far as I'm concerned.

Until that return policy fights back too. That's a learning experience.

I got in a fight with them because I ordered an SSD, I received a box containing brown packing paper. When I wanted a refund or replacement, they wanted me to return the SSD ..

Their returns policy works fine when you fit in an automated workflow. The moment they have to exhibit independent thought, you're screwed. And if you try to exercise your consumer rights, they'll come down hard. Chargebacks will be met with your account being closed, including losing any access digital media you've "bought" through them (which is why I still won't convert my legacy Audible account to an Amazon account, no matter how many times they ask)

> Their returns policy works fine when you fit in an automated workflow

Sounds familiar... in 2019 I bought a multipack of smart bulbs. Unfortunately, one failed after only a couple of months.

I asked amazon for a replacement, and they wouldn't do anything until I sent every single bulb back.

You're spot on IMO - it's an unregulated bazaar and a scammer's paradise. I gave up buying there about a year ago.
Might want to try adding the “Fakespot Fake Amazon Reviews and eBay Sellers” extension to your browser. Certainly doesn’t solve the problems you’ve mentioned, but helps somewhat.
For me there's sort of a spectrum from (1) "I want exactly this name brand X" to (2) "I need something cheap that does X". Amazon used to pretty comfortably cover both of those scenarios, but lately I've been leaning more and more towards ordering direct from the OEM for (1), or from Ebay/Alibaba for (2). Amazon still occupies some space in between, but it's narrowing.
Yeah I actually prefer to buy more and more stuff from brick and mortar major retailers.
Amazon is a convenience store at this point, you aren't interested in the best prices or highest quality products, but the convenience of having something you want delivered to your door within x days (2 if prime).
Haha these days long gone ... prime is 5 days minimum now.
You need to be specific, because that isn’t my experience. All of prime items I’ve ordered in 2022 have been 1 or 2 day delivery. The most recent one was last week
Amazon has officially rescinded their 2-day Prime delivery offer. If you look into Prime delivery page, there is no longer mention of 2-day. There is Amazon day (once a week) instead.

Depending on where you are and what you are ordering, they can bring it faster, but for most orders 5-7 days is the new norm.

I've gotten multiple Prime orders delivered same day in the past month.
Probably depends on where one is, geographically?
It depends on where you live. In the LA area I can get same day shipping. Some items I can get rushed same night.
I don't have Prime, but in Atlanta I still get packages delivered in < 2 days from Amazon even without Prime (hence why I don't pay for it)
Past tense.

Current state is buyer beware, assume adversarial with all amazon and amazon-facilitated offerings.

I recently bought ~$2000 worth of various purchases due to moving into a new home, furniture, home goods, food, etc.

Not a single bad experience, although I did spend a bit more time than I would have preferred looking through product reviews.

Hasnt been good value for a while now. Shop around and you can always pick up a better deal. What Amazon sells now are mainly no name chinese brands of dubious quality and reliability. They're making plenty of room for other retailer to come in and snap up their market share.
I'll only buy cheap crap on there anymore, when alternatives are slightly more expensive cheap crap in stores. So I basically treat them as an online Harbor Freight of sorts. I don't trust the brand as a whole anymore.

For me, Walmart kills them. Generally better quality, trusted brands that probably won't burn my house down, and they'll bring it to my house from the store today. Or 2 day ship it if it's not there. And I can get groceries.

Between Target.com, and HomeDepot.com I can get a reasonable selection of items that are most likely as described. For clothes I go to manufacturer's website directly, or big department store websites.
Yes! Everyone should know that about clothes, forgot to mention it. I found a shirt I liked in a department store, probably Izod but I don't remember now, and they didn't have my size. Went online, to the mfg site, and that shirt was like 20% cheaper, and had my size. Now I just order direct!

My kid loves her Gap clothes I buy super cheap from gap factory outlet online. 5 bucks for shirts, maybe 10 or 15 for jeans.

I'm struggling to see the point of department store clothing if they do nothing but mark up clothes.

Obvious disclosure: We are not a high fashion or trendy family, ymmv.

> I'm struggling to see the point of department store clothing if they do nothing but mark up clothes

You may or may not case based on your disclosure, but lots of brands have “outlet store” and “main store” versions of their clothes manufactured differently or with QC difference. Sometimes literally cheaper materials and sometimes simply “binning” of QC.

Similarly, many brands of eg TVs will release shadow “holiday versions” of their TVs with worse warranties or lower quality specs meant to hit holiday sale prices (eg 50% off). Obviously iPhone 13 specs are know and won’t get away with it but Panasonic 65TDQ56P (made up SKU on a brand that does BF models)? If they subtly change the specs on the holiday version would you know even when shopping around?

I tried to avoid Amazon because they don't need my money and you can find better quality or better deal elsewhere.

Amazon is becoming a Wish also.

I have not knowingly received any “bad“ purchases from Amazon. Having heard scary stories like these has put me off ordering things from there for sure. But the convenience is just too great for me to give it up.

Maybe I am just fortunate to have not had an issue, maybe the counterfeiters are very good, or maybe I am just clueless, or some combination of these.

I try to stick to only name brand items. If there is a product that looks compelling but is from a brand I have not heard of, I generally look at both their website and other reputable retailers which sell that same product.

I largely ignore the reviews. Not necessarily because they are scammy (which I’m sure they are) but because they are so largely subjective. Reviewers will often give a one-star rating for a product because shipping was slower than expected. Or a one-star because the product didn’t package a standard USB-A cable or didn’t include AA batteries. Or a one-star rating in protest something of the company or product itself. Many times it appears the reviewer did not read the description closely enough, and accidentally purchased the wrong product, for which they blame the retailer.

I almost always purchase from Amazon.com as the seller vs. some Harry’s Tech Supply Store. Exceptions are made if there are thousands of Store reviews and a 95%+ positive rating.

In other cases, I will simply purchase the item from the official brand website, or some other retailer. It’s frustrating that Amazon allows commingling of products from different suppliers and retailers in a common bin. It’s also frustrating that other retailers like Walmart and target seem to have followed suit.

I’m pretty sure I’ve gotten counterfeit polo and Levi clothes from Amazon, but they are good enough that it’s hard to tell other than they seemed to wear out faster.
You may have gotten legit goods from the lower end lines of those brands. Both are terrible about have multiple quality tiers with minimal differentiation in marketing. The difference will be price, quality, and QC even if they look similar.
Outlet mall retail.

The Nike or Polo clothing sold there isn't overstock. It's legitimately lower quality items sold at a cheaper price. They're intended to attract price conscious consumers that like the brand.

That’s basically what I was referring to, though they often have other similar lines.
Yea the Levi sizing from Amazon is all over the map, right?
I've gotten a graymarket webcam (Chinese version 930c, when I ordered a 930e), when ordering from the "Logitech" store, on Amazon.

When I returned it, I stated that I'd better get a 930e as a replacement, but the vendor (not Logitech -quelle surprise) told me that I would get a 930c, so I cancelled the order, and got one directly from the Logitech site (It was a bit more expensive, but not crazy more).

When I reported it, Amazon rejected my (polite, detailed, and backed up with photographs) reports on the product page, and ignored my reports to them. I would not be surprised if the item is still being sold as a 930e (it's not), and as being sold by Logitech (it's not).

I did mention it to Logitech, but they basically told me that Amazon is an 800-lb gorilla, and that they weren't gonna raise a stink (not in exactly those words).

Luckily the exchange worked. Last time I had a fake on ebay they took my money, asked me to ship the product back and never refunded me. Ebay plays innocent and incapable to do anything.
I won’t use eBay for exactly that reason. I have heard the same story, frequently.

Amazon’s used marketplace has similar issues, but Amazon enforces refunds. I once brought a typewriter that was used, but advertised as “like new.”

What I got was broken (shipped loose, in a cardboard box), and filthy (it literally looked like someone puked on the keyboard).

I did get a refund, but the vendor ghosted me. I had to exercise Amazon’s guaranteed refund. Once I started that, the vendor contacted me, and I was able to return the item (packed better than they did), and get a refund.

My father got scammed in much the same way years ago, bought an iPhone, WiFi worked but not the cellular radio, eBay sided with the seller.

Because Amazon's so bad as everyone is detailing here I have started buying much less expensive stuff on eBay where I'd only buy it on Amazon from a 3rd party seller that ships direct, things like books and CDs. Have had uniformly good experiences without paying as much to pass through to Amazon vs. eBay.

I just checked. Yup. It’s still being sold as a 930e[0]. It does mention that it’s not being sold by Logitech, in very small text.

Note the ridiculously low price (it has dropped quite a bit, since my experience, last year). I suspect a number of folks are happy with the Chinese version. Caveat emptor. Lots of apps and drivers can’t figure out what the camera is, and forget firmware or driver updates; let alone support.

To be fair, a couple of the 1-star comments are being listed at the top, warning of the scam, but the item has a couple of thousand “five-star” reviews.

[0] https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CES5A60

Haven't ordered a thing from them in almost three years, Haven't been to a Whole Foods in quite a while, either. They are dead to me.
I still buy occasionally from Amazon, but it's mostly reorders. Searching there is so weird as to be useless. Why do they need all those resellers?

Gave up on Whole Foods. Trader Joe's has shorter lines, good quality, better prices, and less wierdo stuff such as homeopathic remedies. Once in a while, Lucky's, which has short lines and unionized staff.

Why is unionized staff a good thing?
Amazon has a rep for mistreating employees, a union is an imperfect way to counter that.
I still buy tons of things from there, but usually only if it's sold by Amazon.com specifically or the known manufacturer selling there. And if I can find it through Target, it'll get here almost as fast with free shipping, from a company with stronger values, so I prefer that when possible.
Second this. Back the day it was "Fulfilled by Amazon" that I looked for, now that changed to either known sellers or sold by Amazon. All others, well, fir the stuff I look for eBay isn't too bad. Exceptions are, e.g., books. As long as the edition is the right one you cannot go wrong regardkess of seller. I do buy less and less from Amazon, so.
> As long as the edition is the right one you cannot go wrong regardkess of seller.

Haha, oh no, bad news! A lot of times amazon will have special "amazon print" editions and many times they have had printing problems... no print, wrong book inside, etc.

I have never personally seen one IRL but I've seen review pics of people showing the problems with their books they bought directly from amazon.

The search feels actively hostile. It returns so many things that are very clearly NOT matches for what I am looking for, and are things it would rather sell me. And of course there are SO many 'sponsored' results to wade through.

On the product page itself there are a few different page sections that show alternative products or similar products to consider. Only the single one at the very bottom of the page is not a sponsored listing. ALL the other ones are just sponsored listings.

I actually have more confidence in random ebay used listings lately. At least I get what was described.

Amazon makes a lot of money from selling ads so having a search that "requires" ads to be bought to make people actually see your product benefits Amazon.
Sometimes it is easier to find books by searching "<book name> amazon" than it is to actually search for it on Amazon's site.
Sort by lowest price is also completely non-functional. It seems if you select that option, it will return 5 pages of irrelevant junk for you to wade through.
I was just telling my wife earlier today that Amazon considers search filters as mere suggestions from the user. Often times, they don’t even honor price filters properly.
It has gotten so bad that I now actively seek out BestBuy or other places which I know will source out decent quality items.
There's no reason to not buy electronics from Best Buy. They will price match Amazon. You can do it straight from the chat. In store returns, accrue reward points...and of course guaranteed it's not counterfeit.
Losing confidence? No, I lost that years ago. For quite some time the vast majority of the listings have been drop-shipped AliExpress garbage. Many of them are obvious because of terrible photoshops, randomly named branding, and those strange bold brackets in the product description.

But some can be harder to spot because of tricks that sellers use to essentially hijack listings for other products to carry all the positive reviews along. Or they may just go the route of putting completely fake reviews on the product. Some may even be from verified purchasers because they packed a card along with the product offering compensation for a 5 star review. Or they can get verified reviews in an even slimier way involving ordering from themselves and then shipping random crap to people who've they've sent stuff to before.

And then there's the inventory that's poisoned with counterfeits. Thanks to inventory co-mingling counterfeit and legit products can end up getting mixed together. There's a chance that even buying from a fully legit listing will end up with you getting sent a counterfeit product.

However, despite all of that I do still use Amazon. Their immense investment into logistics means that many things will make it to me next-day. And their return policies allow me to order with the confidence that if I get a fraudulent item (or just something I don't like) it will be fairly painless to get a replacement or my money back.

That said, I have also been making more efforts over the years to not use Amazon. I tend to buy all my major electronics from Best Buy or direct from the manufacturer. And I would never buy any food or medicine from Amazon. I don't want to risk things that go into me being counterfeit.

>>> However, despite all of that I do still use Amazon. ... And their return policies allow me to order with the confidence that if I get a fraudulent item (or just something I don't like) it will be fairly painless to get a replacement or my money back.

Oddly enough Amazon didn't invent this. All of the "big box" and online retailers had no-questions-asked returns before Amazon came along. My hunch is that one of two things have happened: 1) You figure out that the most cost effective way to manage quality control is through returns and refunds, and you streamline this process; 2) You go out of business.

The retailers who delivered quality goods and charged appropriately for getting it right on the first try are gone.

> You figure out that the most cost effective way to manage quality control is through returns and refunds, and you streamline this process

No. It's actually just about the most expensive way to do it. But the decision is made by the retailers, who (particularly in the case of Amazon, but also other chains, Walmart, Best Buy, etc) can effectively enforce the decision on their vendors unilaterally, and who coincidentally have virtually no financial stake in the matter (their vendors do!).

> can effectively enforce the decision on their vendors unilaterally,

I can second that, someone I know personally who is building well-reputed longboards in his shop with a few friends, thought a few year ago it would be a good idea to sell through Amazon. Let's just say it didn't went well. Amazon forced them to take basically any returned longboard no matter how obviously it was destroyed.

Many retails don’t buy the inventory directly, it’s still owned by the manufacturer/seller. Returns cost money in the operation but the actual product is free to them. Lots of returns end up in the trash too.

While Amazon may pay for the shipping, many low quality products are probably losing money for the seller when returned.

> Lots of returns end up in the trash too.

Yup, apparently until recently Amazon didn't bother finding a new buyer for the returned products and simply trashed most of them. Now there's a cottage industry of people buying returns in bulk, sorting through, and reselling the quality stuff (kind of like the industry around auctioning unclaimed storage unit contents). However, I imagine that many cheap products even now don't go through the auctioning process and go directly to waste.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66qOop6J8Q8

I'm suffering this right now with an order of lumber from Home Depot. Half the plywood is delaminated and bulging, two thirds of the studs are covered in mold. Talking to customer service, they'll come and pick up returns for free within 90 days - the same as if I merely changed my mind. I guess that means for the next truck order I'll just order vastly more than I need, so they can bring the pick-through-the-lumber-pile experience to my home?
Reselling from AliExpress and drop shipping are orthogonal issues. You don't buy drop shipped stuff on Amazon because it would take too long too arrive. The value of Amazon is having items in local warehouses already.
I've received things via DHL that I had no idea when ordered it was coming directly from China. However, being DHL, it arrived in 2-days. There was no signifincant offsetting charge for this delivery method.
> And I would never buy any food or medicine from Amazon.

The price premium to know I'm getting a legitimate version of something in this category is painful. Protein powder might be twice as expensive directly through GNC, but I share your sentiment. I'm comfortable with the risk of a fake widget, but absolutely not with food.

Ugh. Thanks for mentioning that. I've been getting protein powder from Amazon as well as vitamins and some other supplements. I should stop that ASAP.
As long as the manufacturer has a Amazon store set up that you buy from it’ll be fine
I have seen a lot of suspicious "manufacturer" storefronts.
not necessarily, thanks to the joys of commingled inventory! "GNC Storefront" goes in to the same bin as the rando person who put a label on some melamine powder, since it has the same UPC. In fact this also applies to Amazon stock as well - with the exception of Amazonbasics since they don't allow third-party sellers of their own products.

Correct me if I'm wrong but while there is a way for sellers to pay for non-commingled inventory... this is not signaled to consumers in any way either, this is a benefit to the seller to avoid increased returns, not to you as a customer. So you have no way of knowing where any particular "sold by amazon" or "fulfilled by amazon" item comes from. Probably by design... it would not surprise me if "no discussing commingling" was a rule too. It's in Amazon's interest to keep this opaque so that consumers treat them all as interchangeable commodities rather than favoring one storefront or another. Consumer loyalty would be detrimental to amazon's leverage over sellers.

everyone hates the non-prime items because they come slower and frequently incur large shipping costs... but those are the only items that are guaranteed to come from a trustworthy supply chain (if you trust the seller). Prices are actually often higher than a direct transaction with a vendor because they pay large fees to transact on amazon's platform too, and the shipping costs are often more sensible as well.

You really need to price it out because between prime costs, platform costs, shipping costs, etc, amazon is often not that much cheaper than directly transacting with a merchant, and then you would get a trustworthy supply chain by default.

The only thing keeping me on the platform is the unlimited 5% back from the amazon prime card (vs 3% for the card without prime), which can be worth it for certain big-ticket, difficult-to-counterfeit electronic items... and even then, I may end up significantly reducing my usage because Amazon has recently sent me a warning telling me to knock it off (a string of items damaged in shipment). Well, I'll have to make sure I don't order anything I might want to return, then... and I'm definitely going to re-evaluate in light of the price increase kicking in for my next renewal. The platform flat-out does not work if they start getting bitchy about returns given how awful it is in other considerations.

I know you are correct about the seller being able to pay to avoid commingling. The fact that they refuse to show which products paid to the consumer seems hard to justify
> "GNC Storefront" goes in to the same bin as the rando person who put a label on some melamine powder

If toxic products are getting into consumer food I would hope the FDA or some other regulatory agency would sue Amazon to oblivion. The USA is supposed to be better than this.

I strongly, strongly recommend that you purchase anything that goes in your body or in your pets from a different source. Costco's web store carries a lot of pet products/medicines (flea/tick, cosequin, etc) at very solid pricing, and even if there is a cost difference, it's kinda just the cost of peace of mind. Is it worth $5 extra to know that you're not feeding your pet melamine or something else that will just kill them?

I acknowledge there are some obscure supplements/etc that are difficult to source from third parties but.. a lot, you can.

Obviously, you're fine with Amazon Fresh.
It's not just the scams and counterfeits.

It used to be easy to tell which items are from third-party sellers, now often that's hidden.

It used to be that I could trust Amazon to have a reasonable price, so I didn't have to price-shop every item every time. Now, many common items are only available from third-party sellers with wildly inflated prices. Now I feel like I have to comparison-shop everything to ensure it's not a rip-off.

It used to be that third-party sellers would be listed in descending order by total cost (price plus shipping). Now they're in seemingly random order, and you can't see the shipping cost until it's in your cart. Many sellers game this by listing a low price with ridiculously high shipping.

Really feels like Amazon is going backward at a remarkably fast pace.

> Now they're in seemingly random order

Oh they aren't random. They're sorted by Amazon profit margin.

> However, despite all of that I do still use Amazon. Their immense investment into logistics means that many things will make it to me next-day. And their return policies allow me to order with the confidence that if I get a fraudulent item (or just something I don't like) it will be fairly painless to get a replacement or my money back.

Spot on for me too. That calculus is slowly shifting in the other direction for me though. It's becoming a pain to have to ship things back repeatedly, and I'm starting to find that the wait time of shipping from normal companies is coming out as a wash when factoring in the multiple-shipment-return-cycle Amazon factor.

At least with other companies that don't have a wild west of third party sellers I can be reasonably confident I won't get an outright counterfeit.

I used to have prime and often place multiple orders per week. I cancelled prime when they made it no better than not having it (add-on items + longer shipping times + "not available for prime"), and only used it for higher value purchases (maybe what they wanted but my net spend was way lower). Now, I hardly order from them at all since you can't really trust them for higher value stuff as this thread is all about.

I still order like usb cables and cloths to clean my glasses. That's pretty much it. Looking at the parent and grandparent comments and my experience, I'd say they've become a flea market, where maybe you can get a good price of some throwaway crap you don't care about, but wouldn't use for anything of value. And in reality, that's what a collection of fly-by-night shady sellers is. It should not be a surprise. It's a shame though, in principle the ordering process and older style prime delivery is way better than going to a store for almost everything.

> flea market

A few years ago I didn't consider Amazon and Ebay as similar options. Now, I think of them as a wash in terms of risk vs. reward with Amazon having a slight edge on return policy (maybe).

I recently bought four Klipsch in ceiling speakers from eBay over Amazon. In either case the seller was not Klipsch authorized, so I knew I was going without a warranty. However the price more than justified the trade off. But in the end, I chose eBay because the seller posted enough pictures of the actual stock for me to believe it. And also, the seller reviewers were great. Nobody bothers with seller reviews on Amazon but they do on eBay.

I dunno, my point is you're right, it's a wash at this point.

>the seller posted enough pictures of the actual stock for me to believe it

what about a picture on the internet made you believe it? were there images of serial numbers that matched the items received?

Image search for uniqueness. A seller with history of items primarily in the same category.

Compare to the common opposite on Amazon, 50 listings of different products with an identical image.

I never buy USB cables from Amazon any more -- especially USB-C. Their stuff is all cheap counterfeit junk that very often is not capable of proper PD, even when it says it is. It's become quite the task to find good USB-C cables. Recommendations welcome.
monoprice is the go-to, but I'm sure they're just sourcing from someone else and at some point they'll realize there's money to be made by burning down their brand reputation
I'd second this. Never had issues with features that don't work, and the cables I've gotten are bulky enough to not have issues with wearing out the protective sheathe.

They're not the most aesthetic cables, but they're cheap and they work.

Anker typically makes decent products too, but I don't have a lot of experience with their USB-C stuff.

Controversial and not cheap, but since I use apple products and live near an Apple Store… I just buy from apple. They heavily curate what shows up in store so it’s always good enough. That and whatever my work IT sources I’ll also use their brands. My IT had a internal site that lists what they have and I’ll just find a retailer that sells it.

Also I’ve never had that “apple cables suck” experience many had so maybe I’m holding it differently- ymmv

The biggest problem with Apple cables I've seen is that they don't seem as durable as others. But I totally agree that if you want to be sure that a cable is capable of what it claims, Apple is a great choice.
> Their immense investment into logistics means that many things will make it to me next-day.

This is what really turned me off from Amazon. They say it'll get to you next day... and then it shows up several days later (or it gets marked delivered or never shows up, and you have to take the time to call them up and complain to get another sent).

And worse yet, there's always the knowledge in the back of your mind that if you complain too often, they'll simply ban you from purchasing from them [https://www.wsj.com/articles/banned-from-amazon-the-shoppers... etc]

it feels like they realized during covid that people will tolerate it because "everything is a mess right now", and will now take advantage of it forever.

Honestly the problems also coincided with the change to in-house amazon logistics... it seems like the delay rate with UPS/Fedex logistics is far lower than with amazon shipping. Especially pre-covid, UPS/Fedex were just absolutely completely reliable, if they said 2-day it would be there in 2 days, nowadays the most I've seen is an extra day here or there occasionally.

It seems like Amazon looked at the logistics problem and said "we can solve that 95% as well as UPS and if anyone complains too often we'll just ban their account, so there is no need to outperform it since we're not the ones who bear the cost if we don't".

After all - the way Amazon gets that 2-day guarantee is, if it doesn't make it through their logistics in time for delivery on UPS 2-day shipping, they have to pay more to UPS for overnight shipping/etc. That's money they can now retain in-house because lol fuck the customer. And I'm sure on-time delivery was a KPI for UPS/Fedex if they wanted to get paid, they had an incentive to get it there on time or else... and amazon logistics doesn't. Having those two entities be separate led to big improvements in quality-of-service as they each tried to minimize the faults in their own behavior, now it's one entity and it's fine if it sucks.

(not talking about busting the balls of some delivery driver here either, these are problems with amazon's logistics and shipments, not the drivers.)

>it feels like they realized during covid that people will tolerate it because "everything is a mess right now", and will now take advantage of it forever.

I don't think that's fair. Amazon was among the very very few things that actually worked during the pandemic (in London). And they still have the best logistics operation by far.

What's not working is search. It feels like they're not even trying to show you what you're looking for. They're just trying to sell you something ... anything, regardless of how unsuitable or useless it may be.

It's so frustrating that I'm even resorting to Google search sometimes, which says a lot. Product search is universally broken everywhere.

Well, in Germany, Amazon logistics is so bad, that I am actively looking for other online shops that deliver through DHL. Most of the time, I don't care whether an electronic gadget arrives in one or two days. But I like reliability. And Amazon's own drivers usually arrive very late in evening, drop the packet wherever they want without even ringing the bell. Recently, I found an Amazon packages in my garden that was delivered before christmas.

And I agree totally with your point about search.

> They say it'll get to you next day... and then it shows up several days later

Yep, it's running about 25% 'on time' these days for me with Amazon. I've also noticed they'll continue to say 'arriving today by 9pm' even when UPS or Fedex tracking of the package says it is still halfway across the country and it is due to arrive in a couple days.

something is fucked up with their order-tracking platform in general. Returns aren't tracking... refund status isn't updating... it is not just delivery dates that aren't getting updated.

things still seem to be happening on the back-end of course, but the UI to display to customers must be in a database/service of its own and it is often getting stale and never getting refreshed.

Perhaps Amazon's high turnover is impacting their ability to keep an increasingly large and aging codebase stable. The turnover in their warehouses gets most of the attention but it's pretty bad across the board.
Even once "reputable" brands/IP are now falling into the hands of these people and are being replaced with the same Chinese Dollar-Store product, just rebadged with that IP.

It's getting very hard to wade through offers and find what is the one that will make you waste the least amount of time.

If I want to buy something online, I first search at Walmart.com and select the retailer as Walmart (I never buy from their 3rd party...that's what ebay is for...)

Walmart will actively price match Amazon. I know it won't be counterfeit and I can return in store immediately. I had a recent experience when I returned an unopened Apple watch. Despite them receiving it for several days, I never got a refund. I had to chat with customer service. I don't know if I had any products in the past that never got refunded. I only checked for the Apple Watch because it was a significant amount of money.

Amazon at this point is only good for cheap made in China commoditized goods delivered quickly. i.e. needed a pair of throwaway quality headphones recently.

You can return in store immediately, after waiting 20+ minutes in line. I stopped ordering from Walmart because in store pickups and returns are a colossal waste of time.
20+ minutes in line is a colossal waste of time?

As someone from Asia am amused.

Americans expect instant service. You either accomplish that by staffing accordingly or scheduling an appointment online or over the phone so when you come in you never wait. When I visited Japan waiting in lines seemed to be a hobby or a sport.
Neither. Queuing in Japan is as natural as breathing.
I saw a tv show or maybe a YouTube video where they created a line in public and waited to see if people would just get in line, not knowing what it was for. I think it did work. Can't remember what country it was. UK or could have been Japan.
In Shanghai you have the privilege queuing an hour or so just to be allowed outside these days :)

But seriously, it's understandable that someone wouldn't want to wait for 20 minutes when the alternative is simply dropping off a parcel somewhere. Sure, there's always places that are worse but 20 minutes is relatively long, there's clearly room for improvement.

I'm done with Amazon for the reasons others have mentioned and will gladly wait 20 minutes just so to not give them a single cent of my business. But not everyone hates them as much, some folks might not care much either way and just go with what's most convenient. Maybe they don't notice getting low quality trash from some Shenzhen-based seller either. The same way many people eat junk food because it's convenient. If competitors can match Amazon in that regard, I think even more people will turn their backs on them. Because what Amazon does well is automation and logistics, not quality.

I replied to the OC that for Walmart.com orders you have the option to return in store or ship it back for free.

If they don't want to go to the store then don't have to...they can mail it back, just like Amazon.

https://www.walmart.com/cp/returns/1231920

Asia doesn't generally have mature e-commerce with Amazon-like service. In Europe, you can request a return and the courier will show up at your door and take the item or sometimes Amazon will just refund you and tell you to keep it. I'm waiting for Amazon to become a proper competitor here, they'll raise the standards of shoddy Asian ecomm companies
I don't understand your point...Nothing stops you from returning via mail, for free, just like Amazon...?

Walmart has the flexibility of both.

If I have an expensive item I'd rather have the piece of mind that it won't get lost in the mail or in Amazon's warehouse, or like the case of my Apple watch...they've received it but haven't refunded it a week later.

Walmart customer service is open in the early mornings and evenings - more flexible hours than a UPS store or the likes and that's when I'd go where there's less people.

It can definitely vary where you live, but it seems like I can get a good bit of stuff next-day at my location even from other larger online venues or especially some vendors which have a lot of local retail presence. Some retail still hasn't figured out internet home delivery but it seems over the years most have seemed to figure it out OK.

Also, while Amazon might seem to get it faster more often, its also the most unreliable. I've had way more taped up empty boxes and never-sealed bubble mailers from Amazon and many times I've had it promise next day and have it arrive a week later. Meanwhile other retailers seem to not have as many shipping errors and tend to hit their shipping estimates better.

> I would never buy any food or medicine from Amazon.

Wholefoods is owned by Amazon.

Every review I’ve left that’s under 5 stars has been rejected for trivial technical reasons. I received a trash can that was heavily scratched and with poor quality hinges. Review rejected because it contained references to “issues that might have occurred during shipping.”

Every product on the site seems to be rated 4.5+, which makes sense if they’re rejecting reviews in this way.

I’ve left plenty of < 5* reviews. Also seen plenty of < 5* reviews left by other people.

This might be a difference between the U.K. Amazon and their US counterpart but I’ve definitely not had any issues leaving negative feedback.

I'm in the UK and an edit to my original (2-star) review to point out that the seller tried to bribe me was silently ignored (they do not alert you if an edit to an existing published review doesn't pass moderation).
Agreed. I bought the same item twice from the same seller, and both times a packing label was created but the item was never shipped. I couldn’t leave feedback because it was a shipping issue.
The majority of the products I review are between 1 star and 3 stars. It's rare I'm so happy with something I would bother to review it.

I can only recall ever having one review rejected, and I've reviewed probably hundreds of things.

I wonder if they have an internal system that marked your reviews in particular for more scrutiny.

(comment deleted)
I believe the FBA program exists so that Amazon does not seem like a monopoly, as anybody can sell there.. And so, it would seem they have very little interest in policing it..

I personally got my money back many times when issues came up, so to them it’s probably along the lines of “let sellers do their things and be quick to refund if customers complain..”

is this tradeoff worth it? Hard to say..