Tell HN: Razorpay a YC company shared donor data under a Section 91 order

418 points by throw_away_1042 ↗ HN
Razorpay is an Indian payment platform[1].

Recently Indian police arrested[2] the co-founder of a fact-checking website for a tweet he did in 2018. There are reports that Government is trying to nab him for reporting the fake news and religious hatred the current regime has been peddling.

Police demanded the data of the donors to the fact-checking website from Razorpay and they complied without a court order[3].

1: https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/razorpay

2: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/28/delhi-police-a...

3: https://inc42.com/buzz/razorpay-alt-news-controversy-spotlig...

320 comments

[ 3.9 ms ] story [ 314 ms ] thread
current year has brought a lot of public embarrassment for YC
What else happened?
dont forget coinbase and how much Paul vouched for that awful grifter Brian Armstrong. some families out there are now fatherless because they lost money on the shitcoins promoted thru and offered on coinbase.

imagine enriching yourself by having poor ppl transfer over their life savings and causing suicides. this is what Paul & YC/crypto proponents are okay with since its not illegal.

Did Paul ask them to handover the money too?

There is such a thing as using our brains and then living with the consequences of our decisions.

Care to explain, how is this related to the topic in discussion?
>"Razorpay, a YC company shared [...]"
While I have no sympathy for razorpay but I'd just like to point out that laws in India are much more heavy handed than a country like US. People are thrown in jail for social media posts and sometimes just for liking a social media post(1)

Twitter has been having a very hard time operating in India too(2) and routinely censoring stuff so while IANAL just remember that things are very different in different parts of the world.

(1) https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/arrested-over-a-fa...?

(2) https://restofworld.org/2022/twitters-censorship-india/

But as the article suggests why was there a need to share data of all donors, they could have shared only those that originated outside India.
There were no transactions originating outside India, the payments were configured to accept only Indian cards.
Well, my inner cynic assumes that authorities know that. And that is exactly the reason why the wanted the records. Might be a tad hard to crack down on foreign donors, harassing domestic ones on the other hand...
And this is billed as "world's largest democracy". Wtf is the bullshit we are made to believe? Why don't we just stop pretending and relabel most "democratic" countries as just "pro-Westnern"?
(comment deleted)
> And this is billed as "world's largest democracy". Wtf is the bullshit we are made to believe? Why don't we just stop pretending and relabel most "democratic" countries as just "pro-Westnern"?

India is not pro-Western, and none of those things upthread are inconsistent with democracy. They are illiberal, perhaps, but not all democracy is liberal democracy.

>none of those things upthread are inconsistent with democracy. They are illiberal, perhaps, but not all democracy is liberal democracy.

This line of reasoning feels like a motte and bailey to me. When that fact is being trotted out by supporters it's almost always a comparison to liberal democracies. I doubt when Indians say "we're the largest democracy" they're comparing themselves to russia.

India is pretty decidedly not pro Western and hasn’t been since independence.
(comment deleted)
India is a "non-aligned" country, it's not "pro-Western". They have good relations with Russia, which is their main weapons supplier.

The West tends to cultivate them in relation to China, at which point calling them "the biggest democracy in the world" is simply a propaganda tool to sell them as the 'good guys' to public opinions (vs. China who are obviously the 'bad guys'). But the issues between India and China are independent of any "pro-Western" stance or political system, they are purely based on conflicts of interests between those two countries, including left-overs from the British Empire when it comes to border disputes.

> billed as "world's largest democracy". Wtf is the bullshit we are made to believe?

New York Times:

“India is valued the world over for a great many things, but for three over others: the Taj Mahal, Mahatma Gandhi and India’s electoral democracy.” It is the 17th general election in India, being held in seven phases over 38 days. Nine hundred million Indians are registered to vote! Around 70 percent are expected to vote. The voting age in India is 18, and 15 million are voting for the first time.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/25/opinion/india-elections.h...

USA + European Union = ~750M population (not voters)

India has a very effective and fair electoral system, that's about it. The other branches and foundations of a liberal democracy are either a sham or crumbling in India.

Minorities are routinely targeted, court judgments are filled with personal opinions... i could go on.

The mere existence of a voting system does not a full democracy make. Remember, Russia also has "elections".

> Minorities are routinely targeted..

> court judgments are filled with personal opinions..

Sounds like another country that we know of.

> billed as "world's largest democracy".

This is what you are made to believe by the propaganda machine. As someone else mentioned here, India is "elected autocracy". And "first-past-the-post" election doesn't mean the government has support of the majority of Indians.

Sad to say as an Indian, India is going Russia way.

India is weird. It's not really called authoritarian (rankings don't classify it as such), but there are many similar stories of government dysfunction and overreach. Maybe someone else has a word for them?
Corrupt is an appropriate word for this kind of behavior. The government does not officially condone the behavior, and it would probably function well if the policies were followed as written. But instead people get some power and abuse it. India is not unique, many countries struggle with corruption.
Many? Which countries do not suffer from corruption? This seems to be the human condition. As the old saying goes, “power corrupts…”. It’s not of question of “if” a country is corrupt, it is “how much”.
It's more a matter of scale and how embedded it is in everyday life.

Getting almost anything done without having to wait months / years / decades requires some form of black money payment ie a bribe.

For example: have you personally ever had to bribe someone, thought about it, or even considered it a possibility?
True but India does seem to be steeped in it. I once bribed someone in India accidentally and didn't realise what had happened till afterwards. That's how embedded it is in daily life. I can't imagine that happening anywhere else I've been and I've been a few places.
What happened? Sounds like an interesting story
Corruption is large enough in India to have an entire political party dedicated to the issue (Aam Aadmi Party).
Yeah its only "sort of" authoritarian, in most regions you can live quite a free life.

The cases where it becomes authoritarian is when it comes to religion and criticism of the government. This is the reason that the majority of the population does not even believe in issues that exist (social, political, ecological or otherwise).

That just sounds like literally any other authoritarian country. Freedom of speech never was needed in order to speak things which are commonly agreed and central government approved.
As I mentioned above - criticism of any kind of religion can get you in trouble in India[1][2]. But we should not lump that with criticism of government.

Do you have any examples, where someone was arrested for simply criticising govt actions?

1. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/editor-arreste...

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weeping_crucifix_in_Mumbai

>Do you have any examples, where someone was arrested for simply criticising govt actions?

Muslim citizens of India being arrested for criticizing the government's action of insulting their religion

One even had their family home demolished without any due process as revenge for criticizing the government

It is an electoral autocracy. Merely having elections doesn't make it "democratic". Certainly not if much of mainstream media is under the ownership of the biggest "donors" of the current ruling disposition.

Alternative crowd sourced media houses such as AltNews, The Wire among others are under real danger as are socio-political activists, union organizers, smaller opposition political parties, etc.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-56393944

Heres the interesting thing though. A majority of Indian citizens would agree with this overreach. If the majority agrees with heavy handed tactics and they are enforced by elected officials with at least reasonably fair elections then is it right to call it an autocracy?

I don’t agree with any of this of course but it is unfortunate reality here.

Not sure what you’re referring to. A majority certainly does not approve of overturning Roe, quite the opposite.
(comment deleted)
In polls they don't, but in practice, the majority voted for this outcome.
Democratic candidates won the popular vote in 2000, 2008, 2012, 2016, and 2020.
Sorry, but those are people who went to the polls. Those who could vote but did not go to the polls voted for the winner. Voting by abstaining is still voting. If you include the voting population that did not vote in the tally, they effectively voted for this outcome.

And before you complain, that's exactly what I was talking about. That's what we are talking about.

Are there any legitimate polls to back this up? An average American on the internet is probably against the ruling, but that still doesn't mean that the majority of Americans are against it. If that was the case, we should have either seen pressure building up on "pro-life" states or a BLM style movement in favor of legalizing abortion. But I don't see neither.
Yes, lots of them, dating back years. A quick search gives me results of polls run by NPR, Washington Post, Gallup, CNN, Pew Research, NBC and CBS, to start with. The clear majority of Americans are in favor of legal abortion.
> Are there any legitimate polls to back this up?

A number of legitimate polls have found substantial majorities/pluralities opposing the ruling [0].

> should have either seen pressure building up on "pro-life" states

On the one hand, I've definitely seen this pressure at the grassroots. On the other hand, there has probably been significant geographic sorting, especially as the states that are leaning towards de jure abortion bans have been trending that way de facto for years, likely driving people that care about the issue to friendlier states.

> or a BLM style movement in favor of legalizing abortion.

Give it a minute, abortion was a legally protected right until 2 weeks ago.

[0] https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/americans-views-on-abor...

Tyranny of the majority.
The phenomenon what you mention is called "Tyranny of Majority", great many thinkers have indeed weighed on this.
Fear of such a tyranny of the majority is why the founders of the US created the electoral college, and apportioned the Senate as it is, creating a republic instead of a pure democracy. It also describes the original ideological distinction between Republicans and Democrats, the two main political parties in the US. James Madison described a scenario like this in his Federalist Paper #10.

"Complaints are everywhere ... that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority."

Folks belonging to majority can get caught on the wrong side of the fence too - https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/editor-arreste...

I believe the problem is laws related to religion and hate speech. They are stupid. Section 295 is non-bailable offence and can be easily abused by either side to placate group that feels offended.

The discussions about India sliding into authoritarian is interesting because strictly speaking many of these laws are pretty old. I wish that these laws did not exist but strictly speaking these laws have been abused to placate Hindus, Muslims, Christians(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weeping_crucifix_in_Mumbai) at different times.

An autocracy of the majority, for the majority, by the majority.
There is a name for it, democracy.
democracy is orthogonal to what the person you replied to said, as not all democracies devolve into such authoritarianism
The India system is essentially a system of “who you know”. Anyone who grew up in India knows that if you’re a powerful bureaucrat, cop, or politician, you can do whatever you want. The law doesn’t really apply to you.

The only exception is if you manage to piss off someone higher up in the power hierarchy.

Its not so much as authoritarian as it is Darwinian.

Well so was the case in USA few years back.

It is not about govt per se (which is grappling with bigger issues - Russia, Srilanka..) but is about mid and lower level politicians, govt and police officers..

Also the pattern is inconsistent, some regions in India is polar opposite to this kind of right leanings - Ex. East of India. Some are neutral - most of South India. India is a large and complex country; the general sentiment is no different than looking at Ireland and thinking French politics generally sucks (or whatever appropriate example.. I have no clue how politics is in either of these countries).

I think hate speech laws in India are overboard - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_laws_in_India and although not enacted by current govt. it can be easily abused by police and that is what is happening in many instances.

These laws are vague to a fault and govt. has given themselves too much power (and I do not see it changing anytime soon, who wants to give up power?). It is easy to selectively apply these laws and that in itself can promote enmity that these laws were designed to protect from.

>It's not really called authoritarian (rankings don't classify it as such) Because they serve US interest, especially against China. Despite "authoritarian" being a buzzword, you should maybe base your views on a country on your observations (such as the extreme violation of basic human rights in India regarding muslims, the fact that there are laws against muslim and hindu folks marrying, labelled as "love jihad", the fact that the government shot multiple people protesting against the government in 2020) and not on some obscure rankings, funded and made by US NGOs (see National Endowment for Democracy as a reference)
Hmm India has never been a close US’s ally, the latest example being their stand in the Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. They are more often than not at odd with the US’s interest. The only thing that brings the two sides together is China.
They are attempting to become an autocratic ethnostate
Non-sikh here. Sikhs are terrorists? That doesn't sound right. Is this some new hogwash or some such?
Doctored video? What are you smoking? He posted the original video. And the channel has deleted the video from their YouTube channel.

For Non Indians here, TimesNow is the channel and that news reporter is Laura Ingram of India.

When you edit a video to cut the provocation and just show the response- that is doctoring. You denying this video resulted in beheading and riots ?
If you start riots or literally murder someone because of some junk you saw in a short video, maybe the video isn't the problem.
The laws in India are quite similar to US. Unfortunately, current practice and interpretation is far from what was envisioned in the constitution.
> ...laws in India are much more heavy handed than a country like US.

AltNews alleges that RazorPay banned their account (and later restored it) without cause: https://archive.is/R9OJ8

To me, it seems like RazorPay simply buckled under pressure. Why wouldn't they, they need to be in bed with the central govt, or their business falls apart pretty quick.

Heavy handed? They are straight up barbaric not democratic. More similar to China then democratic countries
It's concerning that YC is funding companies that are so aligned with BJP bigotry that they comply with invasion of privacy requests without a court order.
If they find any company in India they’re hitting a 50-50 that the company would do something like this. Only option then is not to invest in india?
If you dont comply with the govt, the govt can shut down your business without a due process if you dont have the money to fight.
I give zero sympathy or support to BJP and its destruction of India's democratic institutions.

Yet, I can't agree with your comment.

First, I don't think Razorpay supports BJP or its bigotry, at least openly.

One indicator of that is that they have retained critical media like AltNews and Wire as customers from years. I don't think they'd do that if they were pro-BJP or pro-bigotry.

Plus, I've noticed that rightwing companies and founders are generally very vocal about their support on social media (e.g.: PayTM, Zoho). They like boasting about their ideology. I don't see that with Razorpay or its founders. As far as I can see, Razorpay is "neutral".

Second, I don't see how YC can avoid funding such companies. You can't really expect them to include a rightwing checkbox that automatically excludes founders. YC itself seems to ignore ideology anyway. To repeat the previous point, there's nothing visibly political about Razorpay. It's not involved in any Indian government projects. It's not a Huawei or Palantir of India. I really don't see how YC can avoid funding such companies.

Third, the justice system that emerges from Indian laws, police training, and even its legal jurisprudence is anything but liberal. And that's ignoring the unethical malicious thinking that's prevalent in those people. We have sedition, UAPA, a quasi-blasphemy law, and a dozen other similar illiberal laws. Section 91 of the CrPC does seem to compel companies to hand over any information that's asked. I see this as an undesirable, but inevitable, outcome of our legal system. Whenever I donate, I do so knowing that I may come under government scrutiny some day.

Probably, Razorpay could have resisted the demand a little. But I doubt any neutral company does that. And even if they did, it wouldn't be for too long - some lower court would have forced them to disclose transactions.

A possible future outcome: The law and judiciary are increasingly turning into kangaroo courts. If Zubair or AltNews are declared terrorists under UAPA, all donors (who were just donating to upholding truth) can be labeled terror funders!

Go through the timeline of founder of Razorpay, and you will know.
neutrality in the face of bigotry seems like alignment, or at least it's a sign of a larger problem which you've very clearly laid out.

I think it's time to consider Boycotting, divestment and sanctions of India since it's flat-spinning into the clutches of full-on fascism.

Very sad.

And India will reciprocate by boycotting all those countries which try to do this.

But you are starting a new type of apartheid.

As is your right.

It will need to start from the individual level so I will be encouraging everyone around me to limit their exposure to Indian businesses.

(comment deleted)
You can do whatever the F you want. I do not care. Neither do most people in this world.
india already does aparthied of it's minorities, dalits (lower castes). So why not?
(comment deleted)
(comment deleted)
On the same day Modi along with G7 countries were signing some declaration to protect democratic rights, his party in India was arresting Zubair for tweeting a scene from a 4-decade old movie. One commentator asked if G7 is trolling Indians.

Western democracies can certainly do a better job if they are principled but they aren't. They take only two extreme positions - either be chummy with dictators or sanction/bomb them to oblivion. Little acts of social control to keep all the dictos in check doesn't seem to be taught in western capitalism's textbooks.

I dont think it has anything to do with BJP. Congress in the past too jailed people for criticizing sonia gandhi over social media.

It was facebook of the past.

Having said that, razor pay has very less options here. Anti-money laundering laws across the world record sender-reciever details out-of-the-box even though the transaction is as benign as buying a box of chocolates.

In this scenario, govt came back to collect information, which it asked razorpay to collect as part of book keeping.

In some parts of the world, an official police request is equivalent to a court order.
I do not know too much about these.

But, couldn't they fight it in court?

Hard to make it in to court with dozens of broken bones.
And not much point after you data has _already_ been shared.
> But, couldn't they fight it in court?

Why would they? They want to do business without much headache.

They jailed the CEO of Qwest who refused to share surveillance data with the NSA without a court order. This seems to be prudent in other jurisdictions as well, other than the US and now India of course.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2007/10/qwest-ceo-nsa-punished...

Apple chose not-jail and not-ban when faced with the requirement that all iCloud users in China be subject to realtime CCP surveillance. Apple's iCloud operations in China (required under Chinese law for Chinese users) are in CCP-controlled datacenters.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/17/technology/apple-china-ce...

Then they did it again in the USA, preserving a backdoor in the end-to-end crypto of iMessage for the FBI:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-fbi-icloud-exclusiv...

If you are large enough, the laws don't apply to the government's strong-arm treatment of you. They have all the machine guns, you have none.

Presumably Apple de facto does not have the right to widely publish surveillance-resistant end to end crypto without state retribution for same, even on home turf with ostensible 1A rights. This is why they are deploying clientside spyware to scan your local files for CP (or anything else they are forced to scan for in the future by a adversary-controlled DoJ or DHS (hello 2025)). The secure architecture of the iPhone and iPad make it impossible to alter or disable this functionality even on your own device.

The power dynamic is the same in all large countries, regardless of political structure.

You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.

What Apple does publicly and privately are not the same thing, and if anything, Apple has a track record of not removing loopholes that would reduce the surface area available for secret agreements and/or orders; for example, iCloud being able to view data.

Related: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_security_letter

iCloud Backup is not end to end encrypted and is readable by Apple. Same again for iCloud Photos. The Apple-readable iCloud Backup contains the keys for your iMessages, which means Apple can read those in realtime as they transit the servers (due to relaying the ciphertext, and having the keys from the non-e2e backup).

Even if you disable iCloud Backup, everyone else you iMessage with will back up all your iMessages from the other end, because it is on by default.

The idea that Apple can't read your data is mostly false. They can see all your photos and read all your chats, and all of the other files and app data from your device. They can do this without your device or password at any time.

They do this for the US government without a search warrant to over 30,000 user accounts per year, per their own transparency report.

> If you are large enough, the laws don't apply to the government's strong-arm treatment of you. They have all the machine guns, you have none.

Interestingly this also works for small fish: If you are too small, you can get by without sticking to the rules because you won't be on the governments radar.

It's true. The rules applied (in practice) to small exchanges are not the same rules applied to Coinbase.

Equal application/protection under the law is a myth.

Worth noting that Nacchio was jailed for insider trading, not anything national security related. He wanted to present evidence that it was retaliatory for not working with the NSA but was not allowed to. His only other defense was he thought the company was doing better than it was even though Qwest own numbers said otherwise.

The prosecution on the other hand documented pretty extensively that he and several Qwest execs were making false claims to the press to increase the Qwest share price so they could buy US West.

tl;dr don't save sensitive data all together. Encrypt if you must so that even you can't access it if you wanted to
This is very sad to see, and makes me really worry about the people who got their names handed to the police.

The current jingoistic BJP regime is doing all sorts of authoratarian things in India, like demolishing housing for merely taking part in protests [0].

They have also used facial recognition techniques to identify mere protesters and punish them severely [1].

They put a doctor in jail for saving lives of kids by paying for oxygen out of his own pocket, because he publicized those already dead [2].

I am seriously worried about what will happen to the people whose names were in the donors' list.

Will they be arrested, be put on some sort of shitlist and their lives will be made full of problems because they dared to fund a company that merely fact-check the lies spread by the IT cell of the ruling party?

Note that, the tweet is a mere screenshot of a movie from 1983. The director or the producer of the movie aren’t touched. But sharing the screenshot unedited put him in jail [3]. It is also a major factor that he has an Arabic name.

[0]: https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-asia-india-61785275

[1]: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-india-citizenship-protest...

[2]: https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/explained-who-is-dr-ka...

[3]: https://m.thewire.in/article/communalism/kissi-se-na-kehna-m...

Referencing the BBC and the Wire here is the equivalent of quoting the WaPo when discussing Trump.
You want him to refer India Today, Timesnow, republic, euro news, danik bhaskar and Dhinamalar?

Or **opIndia?

Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement applies here. You couldn't refute the central point of something you disagreed with, so you resorted to sarcasm and mockery. Perhaps it would've helped if you had a proper counterargument based on facts and reason. Maybe you could have encouraged us to see things the way you do, but the comment you just wrote will only serve to nudge us to disagree more strongly with you.
(comment deleted)
(comment deleted)
presumably you, throwaway_1928, have a personal problem with both, but are not willing to share it
Please do not take HN threads into political flamewar. It's not what this site is for, and it destroys what it is for.

We ban such accounts, and creating accounts to do it will eventually get your main account banned as well, so please don't.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

In UP, India, a Muslim restaurant owner was arrested because the non-veg food he wrapped with old newspapers had photos of Hindu gods and goddesses.

https://thewire.in/rights/up-man-arrested-for-wrapping-chick...

I don't doubt that this article is biased, but that doesn't change the fact that such laws are entirely unreasonable.
I can share ten stories where the offenders are Muslims and the victims are Hindus. Wire won't be covering those stories. This newspaper is as prejudiced against Hindus as it gets.
The Wire doesn’t need to cover them because mainstream media channels are already blasting them on primetime everyday.

Amazing that in a country where there’s a Hindu in practically every single position of authority, Hindus still harbor such a deep seated victimization complex.

Not that amazing. In the US, see Christians, white people, and men.
And like every where, if something threatens the perceived superiority of a well established, powerful group that group will do everything to fight. Regardless of religion.
That’s exactly what I dont understand. It’s so ingrained. In my apartment complex’s (Indian residing in India here) WhatsApp group, we’ll have people whose WhatsApp numbers are from the Middle East but they’ll be fulminating about Muslims like the rules of irony don’t apply to them.

I just don’t understand what people are so angry about.

Everything is going as well as it could in a billion strong parliamentary democracy but people are still mad about old wounds.

Not that I support the intention of cops to go at his restaurant in the first place, in the article I read, he swung his knife at the cop as well.
You definitely do not want to believe the cop versions of the story. Cops in India have been planting fake evidence in the activists phones and they will go any length to prosecute those who fight the system
It's important to note that the cops partake such actions on the directions from higher-ups.
The Nuremberg defence?
Or "the entire police force is corrupt, not just the beat cops".
Except I would rather have the cops punished along with their higher-ups. It's common in India to punish a low-level cop and call it a day. All this while the real masterminds go on to create even more problems for the society.
> Not that I support the intention of cops to go at his restaurant in the first place, in the article I read, he swung his knife at the cop as well.

No the article says - Police "alleged" that he swung his knife as well, which he and his family denies. I don't know what really happened but it would be silly to solely rely on cop's version of events.

It would not be surprising to come into a restaurant kitchen and see the owner holding a big knife. He might even gesture without setting the knife down first.
>it would be silly to solely rely on cop's version of events.

Especially in Modhi's Hindu nationalist India.

A shame that corrupt and poor countries are not protecting their startups. Doesn't the police and government in India understand that such abuse will steer away even more investment?
(comment deleted)
They'll just blame the other countries. The government, the police, and most the population exhibit an exceptional ability to believe in their own lies.
I’m a startup founder where most of our employees are based in India. I don’t condone this move by Razorpay. However, as someone else pointed out, the legal process in India is not robust, and it is biased toward people in power. Here are some constructive ways to avoid situations like this:

1. Register your company outside of India. The US is an excellent option because of the solid legal framework.

2. Encrypt the data. Ask for access from your customers, even for your own support teams.

3. Use international companies for services whenever possible.

It would be great to have a regular process to delete old data if you don’t need it for business purposes, and this is hard to do because you could develop an innovative way to add customer value using the old data you don’t know of today.

Unfortunately, the data part won’t work very well because of the strict data localization laws that require financial data to be stored in India. Related to this, Amex and MasterCard were banned from issuing new cards in India. The ban on MasterCard was removed recently (nearly a year later) after compliance. The ban on Amex is still not lifted.
i am sure there are compliance and regulations which would prevent FinTech companies acting on their own whims.
> It would be great to have a regular process to delete old data if you don’t need it for business purposes, and this is hard to do because you could develop an innovative way to add customer value using the old data you don’t know of today.

It is not "hard to do" just because you would like not to do it. This is the first step you should be taking, not faffing around with international corporate registrations and encryption to create weak protection for data that you shouldn't have in the first place.

I'm not a lawyer, nor am I an Indian lawyer, but if Razorpay received a Section 91 order (https://indiankanoon.org/doc/788840/) they wouldn't have much choice on turning over any records. It looks to be the rough equivalent of third party doctrine in the US (which is also horrible).

It can come from "any Court or any officer in charge of a police station".

Banks and fintech in many countries are even more exposed to data demands than regular data processors.

Pitchforks may be justified here, but perhaps not directed at Razorpay.

Razorpay did receive a Section 91 order according to their tweet: https://twitter.com/Razorpay/status/1544313411621646338
Ok, I've edited the title above to include this detail. (Submitted title was "Tell HN: Razorpay a YC company shared donor data without court order".)

This is less moderation than we would normally do. Under normal circumstances, we would not allow a submitter to use a text post to put their own tendentious spin on a story like this—especially when the account seems politically driven (e.g. bringing up past partisan tweets to bolster a political case, which is not in the intended spirit of HN). Most probably we'd change the post to point to the most neutral third-party article we could find—or, if someone had already posted one, we might merge this thread into it.

However, the first principle of HN moderation is that we moderate less, not more, when YC or a YC startup is involved (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...). So I'm suspending normal practice in favor of this relatively small intervention.

Edit: I suppose I should add that none of what I've written here has to do with the specific details of the story, which I haven't personally looked into. Commenters in this thread seem to be doing a reasonable job of discussing it, with the exception of some veerings into religious/political flamewar, which we've done the usual moderation with.

I suppose I should also add that we haven't downweighted the submission—its ranking is being determined by user voting and flagging. And we haven't pinned any comments, except the moderation replies in flamewar subthreads like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32000788 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32000252 (standard practice).

I don't think @dang will pin the above comment, but this needs to be higher here as the reply includes that they received a legal order. This is maligning the company unjustly.
exactly. Only intent is to malign Razorpay, so OP also chose to create a throw away account. Razorpay didn't really have much choice in this.
The account I have used is more than a year old. I would be harassed by Hindutva goons online and offline if I use my real identity. Maybe also a false police case.

Also Razorpay is not innocent here. They could have disputed the demand in the court. Could have informed the users that their data was shared with government. Could have shared only the transactions that originated in a foreign country.They did none of these.

Also note that donations could not have been done with a foreign credit card. So the intent is to harass the individuals that supported the fack-checking website.

Also, note that the founder and the company has been fans of the current nationalistic government. More reasons why they did not dispute the police demand.

https://twitter.com/shashank_kr/status/1175974410202697728

https://imgur.com/a/ZDRZZ87

> They could have disputed the demand in the court.

Why just that, they might as well fight the case for the accused.

> Could have shared only the transactions that originated in a foreign country.They did none of these.

We re sorry but it doesn't work like that. I am not sure if you understand that its not in hands of razor pay to bargain what they would like to share.

Without knowing what is written on the Section 93 order, you and I don't know if the company in question can even limit the requests to what you propose. On the contrary, it could be written in no uncertain terms to give all transactions related to a certain organisation including domestic donations.
Razorpay is innocent here. What kind of language is Hindutva Goons? Indian law is applicable at Indian soil as American law is applicable soil. American financial law are very similar for 3rd party companies. You have clear intent to hurt Razorpay brand value.

Let’s say if a CEO support country top leader and there is nothing wrong in it. He is Indian citizen and it’s his choice to do so.

I have donated several foundations in India from US via razorpay gateway and it works for few VISA cards.

You can’t dispute with police under this section given section 91 is a rare section. Your intent to harass, malign YC brand name and its companies. Please do read about section 91 and it’s implications.

Please check your claim and facts. Be a positive member to YC community. Any topic associated politics and hate should not be discussed here.

Let’s make better world talking about latest technology trends.

I think YC in future to flag post like this if they see motivation towards politics and false information.

Just updating the title doesn’t help much. The post owner pretended and presented a false and half narrative. He used only links that would be beneficial to his claim or final purpose.

OPs fact checking gives you a good idea of the kind of “fact checking” the person in the center of this story (Zubair) used to do as well.

They hate the ruling party, who to be honest are amoral assholes like most Indian politicians and bureaucrats, so facts don’t really matter to them.

>You can’t dispute with police under this section given section 91 is a rare section.

This is not true. There is enough precedence where this was successfully disputed. Including by Google and Amazon in India. Would Apple turn in all the records if a police officer asks for any data they seem fit for an investigation?

Re Hindutva:, there is enough literature online to educate you about it. https://cjp.org.in/tag/hindutva/

(comment deleted)
Exactly! They received a legal order and company has press release which completely justify action taken.
Would they care to share a copy of the order, in that case?
(comment deleted)
I would be upset if an American company was enabling this kind of government abuse in a foreign country. A local company complying with local laws? Ok I recognize that it is bad but I don't blame a company with following their local laws. You can only expect so much rebellion.
>money was received from syria and pakistan to this account

This is untrue. Razor pay did not accept international credit cards.

>Data was sought from the startup about this account by court order.

There was no court order.

bruh, razorpay supports processing international cards. its literally on their website.
> money was received from syria and pakistan

Did you learn this from WhatsApp University?

RazorPay does not even support non-Indian credit cards and payment instruments unless explicitly turned on - and this wasn't the case with Altnews. So there is no way anyone from Syria or Pakistan could have donated to Altnews.
(comment deleted)
This is where Monero (a cryptocurrency with anonymity built in) could have been able to hide the donors identity from being shared with the government.
Altnews don't receive payment from abroad. You know it well, and you won't say it here. We all know the reason.
No, actually, "we" don't all know whatever you're not talking about.
I don't think AltNews received foreign funding. Nor was it possible for Razorpay to process the payment.

Interestingly, it's possible for political parties to receive foreign funding (via. Electoral Bonds) without much transparency to the electorate about how much they receive.

Razorpay might be in trouble for processing foreign funds without FCRA approval.
International credit cards were always disabled for Altnews.
No foreign donations

We do not accept foreign remittance as we are not registered under the FCRA Act. Only Indian citizens with Indian bank accounts can donate currently.

The problem with this approach is that a vague "because terrorism" can justify a heavy handed approach to a very large set of policies which have nothing to do with terrorism. And "because terrorism", "because covid", "because child abuse" become convenient tools for the government to force this or that policy on its citizens. It is a lot easier to claim "because terrorism" than to argue a policy on merits and respond to counter arguments.

The upstream question is harder to answer, though: if the majority of the governed support this approach, is it democracy in action or an autocratic overreach?

Well, unlike west in India the impact of the said terrorism are much more visible. In the 90s and 2000s, all the major cities were having routine attacks by the said terrorists, so you can see why it is easier to gain sympathy on anything that can be seen to act on it. It is quite a big issue in the country.
I am not saying that the terrorism (covid, child abuse, etc.) is not a big problem. It must be a big, highly visible problem to be used by politicians to justify their policies. But that justification is often lacking, as claiming that this is a fight against a highly visible, important problem suffices.
If terrorists attack Americans, they are called 'terrorists'.

If terrorists attack Indians, they are called 'militants' or simply 'fighters'.

Most people outside of India would be completely ignorant as to terrorism in India, so I wouldn't give their opinion much weight. I was pretty shocked that it was apparently common to have metal detectors at movie theatres, for example, at least in some cities - there's no real awareness of that outside of India/Indian diaspora as far as I know.
I’m old enough to remember when Indian terrorists used to call up journalists and editors and demand that they be referred to as militants.
I would like to remind you that ever since the current government came into power, the number of terrorist attacks in the major cities has drastically dropped.

At one point of time, it used to be regular news to hear about the jihadists bombing places.

I was about 8 or 9 when there was a bomb blast quite close to my house in Hyderabad. That was about 10 years ago.

Folks in the west appear to condemn others but not themselves, leaving a rather poor taste in the mouth.

But that reduction in foreign terror attacks happened all over the world.

The Mumbai terror attack was followed by similar attacks in Paris where civilians going about their day were targeted.

That wave of terror is over, probably because ISIS and AQ are no longer the force they used to be.

Now it’s domestic terror and social polarization.

Don’t think these laws are the reason why foreign terror attacks reduced.

The groups you mentioned have little to do with India. Some of the groups responsible in India were dealt with and some are still active mostly outside now.
I agree, but We need focus now on Hindu Terrorism. That's the major threat to the country and the world.
Actually, it's fanaticism in all its forms that's the major threat to countries and the world.
Can you give examples from the world where they have killed people or been involved in violence in general in the name of religion?

There is sufficient Hindu diaspora outside, so this comment seems extremely uncalled for.

[dead]
and these are from outside India like you were claiming?

My point was there was sufficient Hindu diaspora outside but it has not been involved with violence of religious nature and are mostly considered model minorities.

The problem in India is well known, and it is an actual issue there. Although, I will add all of the events you mentioned have precursor events to them as well; not that that justifies anything.

Exactly. No one is talking about how a Muslim tailor was killed by a bunch of Hindus and brazenly captured in video which also threatened the country's PM of a similar fate. The Hindu community then proceeded to pelt stones on the Police which came to arrest the killers.
remember akhlaq who was killed for allegation of eating beef, by hindu terrorists of india? Remember the hindu terrorist shambhu lal regar, who killed a man on live facebook, then proceeded to burn his body.

it's high time the world recognizes this issue and places security concerns in respective countries for people having such bent of mind.

Your language is one which is mostly employed by leftists Congressis, psuedo-liberals and radical Muslims in India. This "Hindu terrorist" word has been coined by such people to whitewash the horrific crimes done by radical Muslims in India and all over the world. Do you have a single incident to show where Hindus have been involved in a terrorist activity in any part of the world?
How many terrorists activities did Amnesty International sponsor? Why were they shut down if they didn't..
The razorpay account on which altnews is on did not allow to accept payments from foreign countries.

Out of the payments done through Indian banks to altnews, the government is searching if there is a foreign IP address. The social media trolls are making an issue that altnews is being funded by terrorists from Syria and other countries

Any idea how much money came in from the so called terrorist wih Indian bank accounts with a foreign IP addresse? It's 2500$

It's a mere 2500$

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.indiatoday.in/amp/india/sto...

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.livemint.com/news/india/alt...

Here's what happened:

- Nupur Sharma, spokesperson of the governing party (BJP) mocks Prophet Mohammed on National TV saying that he had sex with a 9 year old. She then justifies it saying she was quoting the Hadith (Islamic religious texts).

- ZooBear on Twitter brings attention to the issue, via his channel AltNews

- India gets international condemnation, Gulf countries are pissed

- India apologizes to various Gulf countries and calls Nupur Sharma a "fringe element"

- Muslims in India are still very, very angry. There are widespread calls to behead Nupur Sharma.

- Two people get murdered (one beheaded and the video streamed) for supporting Nupur Sharma on Social Media

- Now it's Hindus' turn to be pissed; they want ZooBear arrested (using whatever laws they can find)

- They dig up ZooBear's own old social media posts, file cases against him using blasphemy laws, and he gets arrested

- The govt is pissed too; so they try to lock ZooBear up under various laws, such as laws pertaining to how international donations need to be accounted

- The police ask RazorPay to hand over a list of people who have donated to AltNews, under Section 91 of the Code Of Criminal Procedure

- They comply.

Whenever I think US politics have gone off the rails, it's perhaps comforting to see other countries are way worse.
Except this kind of system (significant nepotism, open corruption, a government that people mostly don't have faith in, strongly charged with religious fervor and rhetoric) Is pretty much exactly what the more aggressive parts of the American Right are literally trying to make happen.

Oh, and they are succeeding spectacularly.

Not entirely true.

- TV debates in India are charged and partisan.

- Nupur Sharma was debating a man named Tasneem Rehmani.

- Tasleem Rehmani said something denigrating towards a Hindu God (which is normal and typically goes unpunished and even unnoticed in India).

- Nupur Sharma countered him by saying "Do not mock my religion. Do you want me to start talking about flying horses or the fact that your Prophet married a girl at age 6 and consummated the marriage at age 9?"

- Various Islamic scholars have themselves said exactly what Nupur Sharma said. She was merely quoting their own texts in a debate.

- Debate goes on and ends. Nothing happens for days.

- Self-proclaimed 'fact checker' (not a journalist, according to himself) Mohammed Zubair edits this debate clip, removes the provocation by Tasneem Rehmani, only showing Nupur Sharma 'insulting' this religious Prophet.

- Zubair then distributes this clip across social media and various Islamic Whatsapp groups.

- In India, free speech is not absolute. Saying and doing things to create enmity between religious groups is a crime.

- The fact that what Nupur Sharma says is factual and simply a response to what Tasneem Rehmani said, becomes irrelevant.

- Many Muslims in India, millions of whom study in Islamic seminaries (madrasas), are whipped into a frenzy and behead multiple people with the slogan 'Sar Tan Se Juda' (meaning they will separate heads from bodies, in the ISIS style).

- Police and agencies arrest this 'fact checker' Zubair and are looking into his funding. This is where the RazorPay data comes in.

- Prior to his arrest, he deletes several of his social media posts and tweets mocking Hindu Gods.

- Various organizations like the BBC, New York Times, Al Jazeera as well as India's left leaning publications decry Zubair's arrest as an 'attack on democracy'.

TL;DR two extremists make offensive statements on television, journalist tweeting a segment from it to bring it to public attention gets arrested.

You may argue that Mohammed Zubair is somehow an evil cynical person who wants to watch the world burn, but the fact is that tweeting a segment from national television is not a criminal offence and should not be treated as such.

> which is normal and typically goes unpunished and even unnoticed in India.

Kudos for living in an alternate dimension!

Well he was not arrested for it.

If he had stuck to doing what he did I guess no one would go after him.

He had caused diplomatic issues and bayed for nupurs head. It would do well to remember what a minority ABV gov did to tehelka and promotors. Guess that is what Modi gov is trying here.

Nupur caused the diplomatic issues with her comments, as the counterparty countries with the actual issues clearly articulated to both India and the world, in response to said comments.
> Tasleem Rehmani said something denigrating towards a Hindu God

I watched that entire debate and he didn't say anything degrading towards Hindu Gods.

Here's the context- Hindu RW claimed a fountain in Gyanvapi mosque (situated in Kashi) as Shivalinga (God Shiva's phallus)[0] which is a part of larger campaign of claiming Muslims mosques as Hindu temples by RSS/BJP. Started with demolition of Babri mosque (situated in Ayodhya) in 1992.[1] The war-cry of the time was "Ayodhya to zaki hai. Kashi Mathura baki hai" (Ayodhya is just a trailer. Kashi and Mathura are remaining)

Many Indians (majorly we secular Hindus) made fun of communal Hindus for claiming anything shaped like a phallus to be a "Shivalinga". I myself shared how in 1990s Hindus in San Fransisco started worshiping traffic barricade as "Shivalinga".[2]

[0] https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/hindu-group-recognise...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demolition_of_the_Babri_Masjid

[2] https://www.freepressjournal.in/viral/san-francisco-people-w...

> Many Indians (majorly we secular Hindus) made fun of communal Hindus for claiming anything shaped like a phallus to be a "Shivalinga". I myself shared how in 1990s Hindus in San Fransisco started worshiping traffic barricade as "Shivalinga".

I will offer you a rhetorical choice. Either we agree on free speech: that you or Tasneem Rehmani or anyone else is allowed to publicly mock Hinduism by saying things like you just did: "Hindu Gods are phallic in shape" etc. and in return Hindus are allowed to mock your favorite religion or way of life in any way. Or we agree instead on no free speech: that neither anyone can mock Hindus in any way nor can Hindus mock others (as is enforced by HR departments in companies). Either way, we will make it a level playing field.

I say this choice is rhetorical because this choice does not really exist.

In reality, if Hindus are mocked, violence is rare. Hindus have no text or decree saying that if they are insulted they must engage in violence. In the rare cases there is violence, it is not due to mockery but in response to extreme acts of violence. And even so, there are groups within Hindus who will hold them to account. One oft cited example by people like you in the context of Modi are the 2002 Gujarat riots where Hindus retaliated on the streets after 59 Hindus were burned alive by a Muslim mob in a train compartment. For 20 years, every left-leaning Indian and Western publication, the usual suspects, likened him to 'fascist hitler', even though he has been exonerated at every level of court in India, including in the final appeal by the Supreme Court recently [1].

However, if Islam is mocked or even questioned, there will be threats, intimidation, violence. The Nupur Sharma case is not the first and will not be the last. As examples, see cases of Salman Rushdie [2], Ayaan Hirsi Ali [3], Geert Wilders [4], Samuel Paty [5], Charlie Hebdo [6], Mila [7], Asia Bibi [8], Salman Taseer [9], Taslima Nasrin [10] and countless more.

You are well aware of this double standard. You openly mock Hindu Gods because you are pretty certain nobody will hunt you down and kill you. You do not ever publicly mock or criticize the Islamic faith because you know you do not enjoy that same guarantee.

Winston Churchill summarized this quite well: "While the Hindu elaborates his argument, the Moslem sharpens his sword.".

I believe this double standard must change. Hindus must learn from Israel in this regard. If you hurt the Jewish people in any way, they will hurt you back. You are a 100 year old ex-Nazi in Argentina? Does not matter, the Mossad is on its way. You express an anti-Semitic opinion somewhere? You will never find meaningful work again.

> Here's the context- Hindu RW claimed a fountain in Gyanvapi mosque (situated in Kashi) as Shivalinga (God Shiva's phallus)[0] which is a part of larger campaign of claiming Muslims mosques as Hindu temples by RSS/BJP. Started with demolition of Babri mosque (situated in Ayodhya) in 1992.[1] The war-cry of the time was "Ayodhya to zaki hai. Kashi Mathura baki hai" (Ayodhya is just a trailer. Kashi and Mathura are remaining)

Simply put, you seem to be unaware of the fact that Islamic invaders destroyed places of worship wherever they went as a sign of religious conquest. In India, several waves of Islamic hordes over time destroyed tens of thousands of temples in addition to libraries and other cultural centers. The ones you list are some of the most prominent and sacred to Hindus. Islamic historians bragged about this in their own chronicles.

Upon gaining independence, any self respecting country would have restored all landmarks: city names, places of worship etc. tainted by signs of conquest to their original form. But for reasons I will not discuss here, India did not do so. Hindus must therefore fight these battles in court.

Hindus and India aside, see the cases of Hagia Sophia, converted from a church to a mosque in 1453 after the Islamic conques...

Holy cow. Thanks for the context.

> - Two people get murdered (one beheaded and the video streamed) for supporting Nupur Sharma on Social Media

JFC, humans suck.

Also interesting after looking into it is that ZooBear has tweet after tweet mocking Hinduism, yet takes extreme offense at someone mocking Islam and seems to consider it hate speech.

This is the unfortunate reality of India; the government/police don't need to actually go to court. It can harass companies and executives by simply threatening to / actually carrying out unnecessary 'raids' through the tax department.

The usual process is for the a bunch of policemen and beareaucrats to just show up unannounced; seal the office so that no one can enter or leave, and seize computers / phones, files and demand random stuff like invoices for $10 purchases from three years ago and so on. This can happen regularly until all business basically comes to a halt (unless the company complies with whatever the government wants). [1]

The next step is to threaten arrests and actually carry out some arrests on trumped up charge, and you can wait forever until trial (unless you comply with what the government wants). The trials usually result in acquittal after several years but the process is the punishment. The media in the meanwhile is happy to go along with the official version (that the company is question is allegedly employing shady accounting practices).

The next stage is painting the company as 'anti national', arrange for a few mobs to harrass folks / attempt lynchings and finally actually 'dissappear'/kill people (this last step is usually reserved for judges/writers etc since others usually comply before this step)

[1]: https://www.economist.com/asia/2021/10/02/indias-government-...

How is this working against civil forfeiture?

How is this working against the % of the population incarcerated?

disclaimer: gun owner and competitive sport shooter.

Personally, am convinced that the second amendment was co-opted to be a wedge-issue in that ; it actively separates groups, fills the media with plenty of wedge-based fluff while allowing them to skirt around the deeper truths etc.

My grandpa always used to say:

>>I will never say "I am a gun owner" <-- Something gun owners should never say (see the 2nd amendment, as, when the 2nd amendment is repealed guess who they have a list of

--

Personally EVERYONE should know how to properly handle a gun. ESPECIALLY if you "hate guns" <-- If you hate guns, then you best be sure to know how to ensure (I love etymology; ensure - the act of being sure, proficient, con-fident (vouching for the fidelity|truth)) they are unloaded, safe, or disabled/locked/safe/well-kept/not around fucking kids on SSRIs.

/rant.

Your grandpa has more wisdom than I do.

And yes, the 2nd was certainly co-opted. It is how politics is played; there is a very long list of co-opted issues which were not divisive before they became useful for politics.

That sure is a lot of nonsense. What we see in the US is the government, in the form of the police, abuses the people plenty. That's why there's so much protest when they actually kill people.

And are people arming themselves more to protect themselves from the police? No.

More importantly, the second amendment will not protect you from police. Many legally carrying innocent people have been shot and killed by the police, and there are very few cases of people defending themselves from a police officer and not going to jail
(comment deleted)
Interestingly enough, if all of the above is true, then one can imagine that this very HN submission might be the work of a member of the Indian government/police wanting to increase pressure on Razorpay by applying negative PR to the company.

Post-truth world is not pretty.

There's another comment providing more context; Razorpay is facing flak from some folks because it gave up transaction/donor data for a journalist's company. (Razorpay is the payment provider for the journalist's company AltNews)

The India government is actually trying their best to persecute the journalist (Mohd. Zubair) and putting pressure on Razorpay to get to AltNews/Zubair. (The govt. is trying to insinuate that the journalist is writing articles criticizing India on the behest of foreigners - by cooking up allegations that he has been receiving donations from people outside India)

I'm only arguing that it's next to impossible to stand up to the government in India; Razorpay need not be pro-government or anti Alt news, they are likely being forced to comply with the Government's (perhaps extra legal) demands via shady tactics and they need to save their own skin.

Umm. Only it's not an allegation anymore. The 'journalist' in question already admitted to receiving foreign donations without having the necessary compliance registrations in place.

This is also leaving out the part that this 'journalist' doctored a video about a person and posted it that is causing islamists to give the person beheading threats. 2 people who supported her have already been beheaded. This 'journalist' also has several allegations of fake news of his own. So it's not so black and white.

did they fill out their 27B-6 forms for the donations?

as for the allegations, I have not seen anything about the video encouraging killing, but have seen lots of coverage of the Indian government looking away from, or participating in, threats and actual violence against non-Hindi Indian citizens

An Indian NGO receiving foreign funds requires FCRA registration. That they didn't have.

As to the rest of your comment, his video was doctored to take the statement out of context and aimed at violent islamists to take action against the individual. His specific video is quoted by most of the islamists threatening her with beheading.

the reception rasorry, but "aimed at" sounds suspiciously weaseley, and your focus on how it was received, rather than how it was presented, even moreso.

did the video actually tell people to kill or not?

[flagged]
(comment deleted)
The source you quoted is questionable.

"The website has published fake news[26] and anti-Muslim[30] commentary on multiple occasions, including a 2020 incident in which it falsely claimed that a Hindu boy was sacrificed in a Bihar mosque"

From the wiki page of OpIndia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpIndia

Also foreign credit cards were not enabled on RazorPay

(comment deleted)
Razorpay acted completely in accordance with Indian laws. They shared this information because they received a written order under section 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) of India[1]. This does not mandate a court order to produce the required documents. The order can be given by the officer in charge of a police station as well.

1. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/788840/

You are linking to OpIndia - a virulent, propagandist right-wing publication?
The sad part is people with enough social awareness still linking these publications (ones that push a certain political agenda, in this case- far-right) probably do not perceive this as the sole truth rather as a means to defend the injustice they too deem right being carried out.

In other words, any justification possible for their views.

Yes, OpIndia pushes far-right agenda that doesn't change the fact stated in the article I linked that Md. Zubair has deleted his facebook page after people started reporting his post.

BTW, what agenda Alt News promote? Regarding injustice, if you are alive atleast you can hope for justice.

What justification you are going to provide for beheading of Hindus?

I really wish dang locks down this post right now. It's hard to have a logical discussion when certain parties involved in the discussion (like you, currently) sensationalize everything disproportionately.

There is no point in having a petty argument when your whole world view is warped and you don't recognize what's going on in your country. You seem to only be focused on one-quarter of the reality that favors your views. It might be due to willful ignorance, it might be due to bigotry, who knows. I'm not accusing you of any of those, just stating the possibilities.

Either way, it comes to down to savagery in discussions like these and just shows you don't intend to seek the truth rather intend to provoke others around you.

P.S This is not directed at just you. This is directed at others who practice similar ways of getting their point across as you.

Sorry about the rant, but it's annoying and sickening.

> The alleged fact-checker has been arrested because he has made similar objectional comments on various social media about Hindu deity.

Completely false.

Mohammad Zubair has been arrested for posting a screenshot from 1983 Indian film "Kisi Se Na Kehna" (Don't tell anybody). Yes, let me repeat. For posting a screenshot from a 40 years old Indian film.

"Democracy" my foot!

PS - I don't think that this should matter but unfortunately in today's India it does so here it is - I am a Hindu. A secular one not one of the communal big0ts.

https://scroll.in/latest/1027077/zubair-arrested-for-posting...

Atleast tell to the judges who have denied him bail twice :)

Your secular credentials come from the fact that you will only criticize Nupur Sharma for her comments but will whitewash comments of other panelists or for that matter posts of Md. Zubair.

PS - I am an Indian, who just wants equal treatment for all regardless of Religion.

Hmm. Just a crazy idea. What if nobody went around beheading people for insulting their prophet, AND nobody went around arresting people for insulting their deity? And what if both the beheadings and the bogus arrests were punished by law? And what if nobody were allowed to get away with trying to use either one to justify the other?

I mean, I'm not sure a guy who's been dead for 1200 years AND supposedly has the favor of God needs any protecting, but I'm also not sure than any actual gods are in a lot of need of protecting.

Not that either arrest or beheading would be an appropriate response to an insult to an actually living and vulnerable person, either.

Technically he isn't arrested for insulting diety. But I dont support his arrest, It's just stupid that process is the punishment.
It is not an crazy idea and that is what is being practised in India. In fact, India does not have any blashphemy law. We do have section 295A (https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1803184/).

The atmosphere become highly polarized after Md. Zubair selectively amplified the outrageous comment on social media. He even translated the video in Arabic for middle-east countries to take note. He rejoiced on twitter when the Islamic nations was summoning Indian ambassadors and Indian product was being boycotted. If you are going at that length to malign image of any country then certainly people have right to demand legal action against your mischief.

Again Altnews doesn't accept foreign donations. This is from Razorpay page for Altnews.

No foreign donations

We do not accept foreign remittance as we are not registered under the FCRA Act. Only Indian citizens with Indian bank accounts can donate currently.

It is completely immoral that some people want to paint Altnews as boogieman receiving donations from Pak and syria.
You are all across comments section repeating this again and again.

Does a criminal ever accepts his(her) crime?

AltNews is free to write anything on their website OR on their own page on RazorPay, that doesn’t mean a thing.

There are several hundreds other payment processors and ways that they can avail to get money from foreign nations.

As of current state of investigation, Police say that he has already accepted taking money from Pakistan and Syria.

https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/alt-news-co-f...

This might come as a surprise to most people on this page but India and other countries around the world actually have there own laws and don't follow US laws.

No court order is required for this data. The relevant law states this:

Whenever any Court or any officer in charge of a police station considers that the production of any document or other thing is necessary or desirable for the purposes of any investigation, inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Code by or before such Court or officer, such Court may issue a summons, or such officer a written order, to the person in whose possession or power such document or thing is believed to be, requiring him to attend and produce it, or to produce it, at the time and place stated in the summons or order.

It's not about your laws vs my laws — I think we can objectively judge what sort of protections make sense for someone who doesn't necessarily agree with the government of the day, without going into defensive nationalism.
I've flagged this because (1) the poster is anonymous and (2) they misrepresent the issue in the title and (3) they seem to have some kind of beef with Razorpay.

See: https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=throw_away_1042

Anonymous because I worry about my and family's life. I have a real handle, if I use that, I'm almost certain that I will receive death threats and false police cases.

The issue is not misrepresented. There was no court order. The said police written request is not contested by Razorypay.

Looking at the past tweets from one of the co-founder it is not surprising to see the compliance with the request.

https://twitter.com/shashank_kr/status/1175974410202697728

https://imgur.com/a/ZDRZZ87

> Anonymous because I worry about my and family's life.

I would be far more ready to believe you if you had stuck to the facts.

> because (1) the poster is anonymous

Please rethink this criterion. Those of us who live under authoritarian regimes have to be cautious to protect us from both our governments and members of our society who support them.

Not in the case of an obvious attack. Anonymous cowards I have a problem with, anonymous people who share important information because otherwise their lives are in danger is a different story but this is - contrary to the claims of the author - not one of those, it is simply a very thinly disguised hitpiece. And I'm saying that as someone who has been pretty critical of YC when it comes to certain ethics issues, which - for the most part - they have worked on to improve.
(Part 1)

I don't see it as a hitpiece. A hitpiece is when the main intention is to hurt a reputation. But any damage to reputation here is a secondary consequence of this company's actions that deviate from a moral and legal standard that a section of society wants companies to practise. It's no different from the posts that complain about Google bots blocking access to gmail accounts without redressal - we don't consider them hitpieces though they damage Google's reputation.

OP's intentions, IMO, are to bring to the IT community's attention, this situation where people may face penalties for doing a moral good (donating to a fact-checking service to fight disinformation) and for having their personal data handed to a malicious government without even token resistance.

Since social issues with data privacy and government intimidation aspects have been discussed here before, perhaps they thought this is a suitable forum. Everything OP said about the case and company's actions are factually correct for which they provided supporting links.

The only thing I disagree in the post is the inclusion of YC. I don't think YC could have done, can do, or even should do, ideological policing. "YC company" can be removed from the post because it's irrelevant. But without it, this post may never have been upvoted because western audiences don't know about Razorpay, a local Indian company.

On anonymity and cowardice, I feel you are belittling the entire philosophies of anonymity and whistleblowing that have legal backing even in western democracies.

Plus, there is no upside to revealing one's name when living in a malicious society where online mobs carry out intimidation campaigns, and law and courts don't are not seen as protectors. If OP reveals their name, it may persuade you but what benefit do they actually get?

Nonetheless, if you are strictly against cowardice in all forms, please remember that individuals are not the only cowards here:

1) Razorpay, a well-funded organization with lawyers, handed over data without even a murmur of protest or legal resistance. There are always legal loopholes to at least stall or make the cops work a bit harder. But they tried none of that.

2) The Indian government has overwhelming voter and ideological support, and practically limitless executive powers. Yet it funds disinformation and propaganda networks hiding behind a huge network of anonymous social media accounts, and cracks down hard on individuals who dissent or protest, a minority in our society.

I hope your disdain for cowards is not selective against the least powerful.

> their lives are in danger is a different story but this is - contrary to the claims of the author - not one of those

Yes, it can seem unlikely to outsiders who haven't observed the behavior of Indian outrage mobs on Twitter, Whatsapp, etc. There's a frightening arbitrariness and unpredictable lack of logic in their behavior. One never knows what triggers them. But once triggered, they go all in with doxxing, death threats, rape threats, online bullying, threat calls, and similar. So the best option is to stay silent all the time. The second best is to murmur our troubles to sympathetic audiences from anonymous accounts. If we were to criticize Indian government and it makes it to the Twitter/Whatsapp mob ecosystem, here's a small sample of the outcomes:

1. Police arrested a muslim woman after a complaint by a hindutva activist for posting this WhatsApp status on Pakistan’s Republic Day: “May God bless every nation with peace, unity and harmony”. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/mudhol-woma...

2. Police lodged complaint Against Two Minor Muslim Boys for Listening to a Pakistani Song. The FIR against the teenagers was lodged on the complaint of a local hindu, who objected to their playing the song which praised the neighbouring country. https://scroll.in/latest/1021926/two-muslim-boys-detained-fo...

3. Gujarat legislator Arrested Over Tweets Criticising Modi. The arrest was over recent tweets after communal violence in Gujarat, in which Mevani had called Prime Minister Narendra Modi a supporter of Nathuram Godse, who assassinated M.K. Gandhi. https://thewire.in/politics/gujarat-mla-jignesh-mevani-arres...

4. Delhi university professor Held Over 'Objectionable' Post on Gyanvapi. https://www.thequint.com/news/india/du-professor-ratan-lal-a...

5. Complaint Against Alt News‘ co-founder Mohammed Zubair for Calling Militant Hindutva Leaders 'Hatemongers'. https://thewire.in/government/fir-against-mohammed-zubair-fo...

6. Physics Lecturer Held After Rightwing Activists Complain he Insulted 'Sanatan Dharma' https://thewire.in/rights/silchar-physics-santan-dharma-arre...

7. Police lodge complaint against Assam Professor Over Facebook Joke on Ram and Modi. He never mentioned Ram or Modi in his tweet, but still the complaint was accepted by police. https://thewire.in/rights/after-abvp-complaint-fir-against-a...

8. Woman gets rape threats for tweeting on Dipa Karmakar’s gymanstics in Rio olympics. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jaipur-woman-gets-...

In this discussion, redditors discuss how to i...

The 2018 post was a 1983 movie clip cleared by the Indian censor board.

How does sharing a mainstream Indian movie clip in 2018 be considered as offensive? The Indian government has stooped a lot.

The YC company razorpay founder from his previous tweets has serious inclination towards the ruling government, that's the reason he sold out private data without court order.

They're in India. The laws and customs are different there. Why is this surprising to you?