Show HN: Readwise Reader, an all-in-one reading app (readwise.io)

326 points by tristanho ↗ HN
Hey HN, cofounder of Readwise here. We've been working on this cross-platform reader app for about 2 years, excited to finally share it in public beta.

Probably the most notable thing that makes Reader unique is that it supports almost any content type you could want to save/read/highlight:

* web pages

* emails/newsletters

* PDFs

* ePubs

* twitter threads

* youtube videos (with transcripts)

* RSS feeds

With all of your knowledge content in one place, we built powerful reading and highlighting, as well as a bunch of novel triage/organization features, so you can actually consume & stay on top of that content!

There are also a lot of advanced features too, such as text-to-speech, GPT3 questions/summaries, super powerful highlighting (that includes markup and images), complex filtering/search (with our own query language), sleek mobile triage UI, keyboard shortcuts for reading/everything, integrations with note-taking apps, a browser extension for both saving pages and highlighting them, and much more.

If anyone's interested in more product details, as well as our business model, etc, we wrote a detailed launch post: https://blog.readwise.io/the-next-chapter-of-reader-public-b...

Predicting a common question: Reader is part of the Readwise subscription pricing right now in beta -- there's a 30 day free trial and then it's paid at ~$8usd/month. We also promise to not raise this price for existing subscribers.

Reader is also fairly technically interesting -- our iOS, Android and webapp all work fully offline and sync your reading data/progress with eachother. Our search on web is built with wasm sqlite. We have a fairly intense pipeline for cleaning web articles (removing ads/styling). We share lot of modules around syncing/highlighting across all platforms, etc...

Happy to answer any questions :)

161 comments

[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 241 ms ] thread
Been using Reader as my primary reading + save for later app for a few months. It's truly a joy — it's fast, simple, and works really well. There's obviously a cold-start problem where you need to use it for a bit to get most of the value, so I'd encourage anyone here that's interested in a similar app to give it a couple weeks.
Exact same experience for me. They’ve done a great job of combining all the disparate parts of the digital reading experience and it’s only been getting better over the months since the devs are extremely responsive to feedback and they implement changes quickly.
I use the Readwise sync service and pocket and just checked out the app.

My _several hundred_ pocket articles all moved over seamlessly! Very impressed so far!

Hoping this can replace pocket and my ereader.

I got it a week ago and was hooked within a day.

The things I like:

- easy to send articles to it (with or without highlights) from any platform I use (Android, iOS, Chrome), or by forwarding emails, or by subscribing to mailing lists using the reader email address

- nice way to read Twitter threads

- nice workflow for creating flashcards from highlights

- keyboard shortcuts on web

- reading feels immersive, and choose a next article is easy

I am usually reluctant to add yet another monthly subscription, but this is so nice that I paid for an annual subscription a couple of hours after I started using it.

Switched over from instapaper and it's been great
FYI the homepage is unreadably dim as I scroll down on iPhone - some bug with the behavior that’s supposed to hide and reveal content as I scroll
Congrats! This is truly a game-changer.

Personally, I have two suggestions for a future release:

1). Invert-color PDF dark mode harms readability.

Simply invert the color will make serif fonts less readable. I use PDF.js with the following canvas renderer snippet to create a more pleasant reading experience.

```css

#viewerContainer > #viewer > .page > .canvasWrapper > canvas { filter: sepia(23%); filter: saturate(45%); filter: hue-rotate(181deg); filter: brightness(90%); filter: contrast(93%); filter: invert(81%); }

#viewerContainer > #viewer > .spread > .page > .canvasWrapper > canvas { filter: sepia(23%); filter: saturate(45%); filter: hue-rotate(181deg); filter: brightness(90%); filter: contrast(93%); filter: invert(81%); }

```

Try this with this PDF.js extension: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/pdf-reader/ieepebp... by pasting it to the option page.

2). Custom Font support.

As a power user, I'd like to render the article with my personally preferable font (locally installed in most cases.) Why not simply give users the option to set css:font-family? It's really easy to implement.

Anyway, the current product is pleasing enough! I'm already spiritually a paid-user.

Thank you!

1) Haha yeah, the inverted colors was kind of a quick hack to make some folks happy. That css looks great -- will definitely explore something like that with our designer :)

2) Not a bad idea at all...

So basically, a revival of Evernote?
Still waiting for a solution like what you have done with YouTube videos but for podcasts on the literal run. Easy way to tag a moment in a podcast from an Apple Watch for later review as a transcript I can cite. Best of luck building Readwise Reader, and I loved your post at https://readwise.io/reader/shared/01gewk3j3kt56v6w87qd1qqez1... and have been sharing it with lots of people I know.
I've been experimenting with a new podcast app Snipd, which purports to do this: https://www.snipd.com/

It doesn't yet have an Apple Watch app though, and since (I assume like you) I listen to podcasts while out on a run w/o my phone, that would be the killer feature I'd drop everything for.

Scribd (https://www.scribd.com) îs supposed to also do this. I have downloaded it, and not yet gotten around to trialing it. But honestly I want to give my money to the Readwise team over a large corp if that's an option.
Looks super interesting - don’t have my usual setup nearby so I’ll just ask before checking it out myself: given that you advertise super powerful highlighting, is there a feature that allows exporting/copying single/multiple highlights with proper references to what I’m reading (say, APA style)? That would be a killer feature for me.
Really interesting solution and I was very happy using it today! Some quick thoughts:

- It would be great if you add a feature to import an OPML

- Definitely needs a way manage feeds in folders/tags

- I would also really like a way to export my stuff in JSON/XML in case I want to move somewhere else (not sure if that exists already)

Keep up the good work! Would be happy to pay for this.

We definitely need to make this more obvious, but you can import an OPML. I usually just drag it from my downloads folder into the app, but it also works if you use the 'upload file' command.

The language is a little different than folders/tags (and believe me, I stan folders the one and only time I ever hit the front page of HN it was for an article written in defense of using folders for notetaking) but you can get basically the same effect with filtered views. Here's a deep dive our community manager Erin made if you're interested: readwise.io/reader202

I hope that helps!

PS: Dan said more export features are coming.

(comment deleted)
I use a self-hosted Wallabag and FreshRSS very heavily. Am I the intended audience?
I used that too - similar setup with shaarli and freshrss.

For a front end, I use “Reeder 5” - writing this reply in it now. ( https://www.reederapp.com/ )

Couple it with an on demand vpn like Wireguard and I can sync with the freshrss feed at home from anywhere.

And the price was “pay once” not every month.

I also have Shaarli for bookmarks.

I run Linux + Android on my devices so can't check out Reeder unfortunately. However, my setup works fine:

- RSS: FreshRSS hosted on personal server, use web interface on desktop and the truly awesome FeedMe on mobile

- Reading: Wallabag hosted on personal server, use web interface on desktop and the Wallabag app on mobile

- Bookmarks: Shaarli hosted on personal server, use web interface on desktop. I can share articles on mobile via Shaarlier but not consult them - but I don't feel the need to; I use it as a "check this website later" thing where I delete the entry after checking or storing it in my org-mode setup if I want to keep it.

Reader would replace pretty much all of that, which is nice. But it comes at the cost of 1. monthly subscription, 2. not truly owning my data/product and 3. storing all my info on an external server which I am actively trying to avoid with the above setup.

I need to revisit wallabag - though “Reeder” is working for me. Wallabag is more than just bookmark management?
Wallabag is more of an "article saving" app than a bookmarker. Via the web browser plugin it extracts the text and images from a website if it detects an "article" and stores that on your instance. You can annotate, catalogue etc. the articles at will then.

For bookmarking I use Shaarli. The two have a clearly different intended use. Probably Archivebox is combining the two, but that clones the entire HTML of a page which is also not what I was looking for.

I think the original "read it later" app was "Pocket" 15 years ago. At the core it is still bookmarking with a "reader" mode. I use it on my e-reader (because of the kobo native integration)

I'm looking back to the origins because Readwise is aggressively pushing this concept to the "limits". I mean, offering epubs and RSSs (and much more) is pretty inclusive. This may blur the original "simplicity" goal. However, The UX design is flawless. Nothing to say. So, this will surely help order all that disparate input.

HN readers, don't be discouraged by the price tag. Give it a go, and make sure you "invoke the ghost" [1]

[1] https://twitter.com/deadly_onion/status/1592990487257829376

I remember "Instapaper" being the original "read it later" web app. Found out about Pocket when it was included with firefox and I accidentally clicked on the icon.
YouTube feature is dope, congrats on launch
With all the hype by authors, it is very poorly designed website, app frontend and documentation. I still cannot figure out how to use this thing. I installed the app and app has look of circa 2007. No help pages, how-to steps, guide or anything of value can be found. I go to Twitter and Safari on my phone and have no clue how do I bookmark/save anything to Readwise. Nothing on iPhone or Twitter shows "save to Readwise" or anything like that. Their webpage is just filled entirely with marketing fluff instead of actual user centric how-to content. At lease tell users how to use all the functionality you are relentlessly bragging about!!

The main thing in bookmark/offline readers is ability to search. I see tons of bragging on highlights and not much on search. Can I search by tags? How can I tag anything any way? Can I import my tags from places like Diigo? My primary question is always "where did I saw that?", not highlighting everything I read.

I use Diigo and they are almost opposite for the better. Solid and clear way of how to migrate from competitors should also be #1 focus but here basic stuff is missing.

(comment deleted)
Whoa this is an amazing reader experience!

I struggled to find how to change it from dark to light mode for a really long time, then found it hidden within the Aa button which is only accessible after opening a bookmark. Could you please surface that to the main screen?

(comment deleted)
Paradoxically, the fact that this is a do-everything app makes me much less likely to try it out. If it were just, say, an RSS reader, then I might try exporting OPML from my current feed reader and seeing what happens. But reading is important enough to me that I would be very reluctant to put all my eggs in one basket. Especially a startup, where the best case is that a lot of my most important stuff requires me to pay $100/year forever.
I agree. Subscription-based proprietary software is the worst kind out there in terms of user autonomy, because there exists a strong incentive against your ability to leave the service in order to keep you paying. The larger the scope, the greater my potential loss I face.
I migrated to Reader from Instapaper, which was crashing all the time, so I had little to lose. Before that, my company used Diigo, which felt clunky and unloved. Reader is incredibly polished. I absolutely love it, and I’m delighted when they add new features. I’ve been on the beta for 11 months, and am genuinely excited to read the updates. They launched YouTube support a few days ago, and already it’s great (on desktop). I also love being able to add tweet threads (effectively turning them into articles I can highlight). Reader has a feature that automatically subscribes to RSS feeds you like (based on your reading and highlighting history) and, for me, it was at least as surprisingly effective as the recommendation engines in Spotify and Amazon.

Even though I imagine it’s hard to create software like this, I don’t believe it’s beyond one company to make a do-everything app. Already, it’s do-enough-for-my-needs, and their velocity is impressive. (I want them to add podcasts next, with highlightable transcripts. That sounds easy to me, but every podcast-workflow app I’ve tried has been buggy/crashy/awful.)

Since you apparently use the RSS feature could you explain how it works / what it does?

My primary use case is tracking serials update and shoving the rss target (not the feed itself as that’s rarely complete) into an offline reader. Is this able to load tte feed into its own timeline on its own without user intervention?

Just restarted my Readwise subscription.

* What is the amount of storage provided for users?

* How is content managed when offline? If/When I start traveling more, there will be times when I like to read without internet access.

Just curious - is it fully “offline” / disconnected from your services? If so - why 8/month and not a single payment “unlock/pro version”? Why are more and more apps trying to tickle all our accts for monthly/recurring fees?
For this case, it's probably to cover their GPT token costs. Still though, I agree that this doesn't need to be a subscription by the look of it.
> Why are more and more apps trying to tickle all our accts for monthly/recurring fees?

Because it works. If we want to stop it, we need to actually stop paying for them.

It’s not fully offline — we sync data across your many devices, have a cloud service that parses the clean versions of documents using ML, etc

It’s just that once your device is synced, you will be able to use it + read fully offline, then have those changes sync once you’re back!

I have been using Reader for months and it has been great. I love that it can handle adhoc content like PDFs and also subscriptions like RSS and mailing lists.

The killer feature is exporting highlights to Obsidian for me though. I get a lot of utility from being able to find things I read in the past while doing writing or research.

whoa, good flag! need to start doing this
Loved by strangely similar looking techbros, but not, apparently, women, black people, old people, or kids.
I spotted two women in the testimonial sliders. Can't remember the last time I saw testimonials from older people or children in a tech product pitched to Hacker News in showHN/beta stage. It's hard enough launching a product - give them a chance to get established and broaden their audience.
Aren't the testimonies for all these products machine generated these days? They just need to remove the --diverse=no option from the build script.
Seems unfinished, or maybe it has a really obscure UI. I have an ipad with a couple dozen papers I've downloaded. I signed up, installed the app, and there's nothing there. The "Library" has a single how-to article that explains how keyboard commands work in a different app and that's _it_. There's no way to add articles and no help text. I don't understand why they'd do a public launch of an app that can only read one article.
I’m confused, your app doesn’t appear on share options on iOS.
I may have missed it in skimming over the post, website, and github repos, but will this eventually be open source?

I would love to use such a product, but I only use open source wherever I have the option, and especially with subscription based services.

Either way, congrats on releasing a seemingly excellent product!

Reader is awesome. I’m not a Readwise customer but the app experience is effortless. I’m going to subscribe to your service. Great job!
Was a bit skeptical about how good this was gonna be, but I'm definitely impressed.

The improvements are a lot more apparent on desktop. I love the fact that I can do pretty much anything using the command palette and keyboard shortcuts. Feels like this is the kind of browsing experience that I'm most contend with. The GPT-3 "ghostreader" feature was also great; most of the summary / text generations fulfilled my expectations.

If I have to pick on something: the mobile app browsing experience isn't that much better from Pocket or Instapaper. The scrolling and animation feels a bit laggy in my iPhone. The "ghostreader" feature in the app feels very limited and awkward to enable here as well.

very interesting app! i wish the authors all the best.

i have collected thousands of unread articles as bookmarks. and they all have the tags "unread" and "article". i remove the "unread" tag on articles i have read. the process of going through my list became tedious. so i wrote a chrome extension that opens a random unread article for me in a new tab.

the first thing i looked for, when i opened this app, is how to import bookmarks. and it surprised me that the authors overlooked local bookmarks or bookmark files. that's how most people save what they want to read later, no?

looking forward to seeing that feature.

thanks.