Ask HN: Books you read in 2022 and recommend for 2023

183 points by Pietertje ↗ HN
The year is coming to an end. Time to look back and reflect. What are the books you've read in 2022? Which books made you change your mind or you simply enjoyed? And which books would you recommend to others for 2023?

205 comments

[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 253 ms ] thread
This year I've put myself to the challenge to read at least one book per week which I primarily could complete by reading in the middle of the night while holding our sleeping baby in my arms. It has been an interesting challenge which gave me a lot of fulfilment and has certainly changed my mind on how I view the world. This comment became quite a long read, apologies for that.

Books I highly recommend:

Churchill by Andrew Roberts (p:1105)

A biography about one of the most interesting figures in politics and WWII. Roberts gives a very detailed description of the life of Churchill and manages to keep you interested the entire length of the book.

The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins (p:374)

In The God Delusion Dawkins gives arguments why there is no God, why we do not need a God and why religion is damaging to our society. If you are religious it might not be the book for you unless you are open to hear his arguments and line of reasoning. Dawkins will challenge your worldview.

The Bomb by Fred Kaplan (p:384)

Kaplan describes the policy of different US presidents on the atomic bomb and war in general. And primarily on the inability of US presidents and policy-makers to tune down its military. A chilling read which makes you appreciate a nuclear holocaust did not happen (yet)....

Poor Economics by Abhijit V. Banerjee and Esther Duflo (p:320)

Banerjee and Duflo give a gripping portrait of how poor people live. They offer an insight in the choices and decisions people make surviving on less than 1 USD a day (corrected for purchasing power). It made me completely rethink my own view on poverty and development aid; stressing even more that in order to help one need to have a complete understanding of the individual's situation and the local boundary conditions.

Project Hail Mary by Andy Weir (p:476)

This book triggered my science fiction reading. For some reason I never was interested in science fiction. Most likely triggered by reading Foundation by Asimov a few years back which apparently is not a book to my taste. But Andy Weir completely annihilated that wrong perspective on science fiction. Project Hail Mary is interesting, funny and gripping book.

Kindred by Octavia Butler (p:287)

This book.... From page one I was hooked and almost read it in one go. Butler is a wonderful author and Kindred is a must-read. The book is about a woman traveling back in time to end up on a slave plantation. It's a chilling account of slavery.

Other books I read this year, ask me anything about one of these books. I've added a + if I think its worth a recommendation

Biography:

Navalny by Dollbaum, Lallouet and Noble (p:280); The Man from the Future by Ananyo Bhattacharya (p:354) +

Sociology; Politics; Economics; Business:

Only the Paranoid Survive by Andrew S. Grove (p:224); The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli (p:140); Winter is Coming by Garry Kasparov (p:290); Twilight of Democracy by Anne Applebaum (p:224) +; Man's Search for Meaning by Victor E. Frankl (p:164) +; We Are Bellingcat by Eliot Higgins (p:272); De Zeven Vinkjes by Joris Luyendijk (p:200); Waarom vuilnismannen meer verdienen dan bankiers by Rutger Bregman (p:104)

Comedy: The Dilbert Principle by Scott Adams (p:336)

History:

Band of Brothers by Stephen E. Ambrose (p:432); The Nuclear Jihadist by Douglas Frantz and Catherine Collins (p:413) +; The Spy and the Traitor by Ben Macintyre (p:384) +; De Heineken Ontvoering by Peter R. de Vries (p:347); Red Famine by Anne Apllebaum (p:384); Night by Elie Wiesel (p:115) +

Science, Technology, Mathematics:

Fermat's Enigma by Simon Singh (p:315) +; A Mathematician's Apology by G.H. Hardy (p:153); The Great Influenza by John M. Barry (p:546); The Rise and Fall of the Dinousaurs by Stephen Brusatte (p:404) ++; The Double Helix by James Watson (p:144)

Sport:

Run or Die by Killian Jornet (p:208); The Secret Race by Tyler Hamilton (p:290) +; The Rise of the Ultra Runners by (p:304); Tom Dumoulin by Patrick ...

What a great list, thank you for sharing.
This is brilliant. Earmarked about five from your list for my 2023.
(comment deleted)
Excellent list - Inspired and intrigued - thanks for sharing the list. I hardly get to do sit down and read, and became heavily reliant on airpod+audible after the baby - do you want to share a little more on your reading habit? Like did you get everything on kindle or paperbooks etc. Thanks again ...
I love the feeling of an actual book in my hands. So during the daytime I read paperbooks. During the evenings/nights I read on my ereader as this requires less light so i dont wake up my spouse or the baby. I make sure I have both so I can read whatever I like.

Something which I discovered this year is reading multiple books in parallel. And start reading the book which you feel like reading, not the book which you think you should read. That way I always had the mindset to enjoy a particular book.

Are you retired, by chance? With work, I can only read perhaps a max of 50 paperback pages a night. I would love to read more, but am just stuck on the computer with work so much.
No I'm not. I just stopped watching tv, limiting smartphone time and make sure I always have a book with me.
I realized I can't really recommend books to audiences much anymore, because I don't read those types of audience-books as much as I used to.

But still, here are some I probably bought for $0.99 and enjoyed:

Lost Restaurants of Seattle

This Outcast Generation by Taijun Takeda

The Royal Navy Lynx: An Operational History

A Doctor's War by Aidan MacCarthy

Sniping in France by Hesketh-Prichard

The Art of Whittling by Faurot

Moscow Calling by Angus Roxburgh

Feynman's Rainbow by Leonard Mlodinow

Icelandic Folk Tales by Stefansson

If you like any of those topics then you have my random recommendation, and possibly the indulgent vanity of once more having avoided consumer risk, or maybe consumer regret.

These were fun in 2022, in addition to 1) web browsing, which I find is definitely reading, despite all its numbered-pagelessness, and 2) dipping back into lots of classics and favorites, from Blacksad to Darwin to Scaramouche and Tom Sawyer.

(Possibly throwing in a volume on the adventures of Groo, a Weird Tales, a Comics Cavalcade, some TTRPGs, and a Scooby-Doo Team-Up...)

- Build by Fadell

- Hard Drive by Wallace

- The Inmates Are Running the Asylum by Cooper

These three books are some of the best books in their respective categories. All three are about product design in a way. Build is about the development of the iPhone and Nest. Hard Drive is about the early history of MS and about the stunts Gates pulled to win. Inmates argues that programmers tend to hijack the product design process because they can (programmers write the code after all), and that products suffer as a result.

> Inmates argues that programmers tend to hijack the product design process because they can (programmers write the code after all), and that products suffer as a result.

Yikes! The typical HN post says MBAs ruin everything. Who knew programmers who have troubles interacting with people would build products which have troubles interacting with people!? (i'm not an MBA)

The engineering and tech mind is different from most. We tend to focus on adding function because we think it's cool. Eventually the software gets so complicated that general users find it a chore to use. All they want to do is get their work done and move on. It's hard for us to truly believe that more function is not always better.

BTW, look at HN. It can have so many more functions but it does not. As a result it's very easy to use for everyone no PhD in HN needed.

Great list! Do you have any recommendations for books on inclusive design? Does any of these books touch upon the topic?
Thanks! I don't have a great recommendation. About Face by Cooper (same author as Inmates) is good, but only covers inclusive design indirectly. Good design makes products automatically more inclusive, but design specifically for people with impairments is something I know nothing about.
- The Ministry for the Future, by Kim Stanley Robinson

Really solid cli-fi (climate-science-fiction). Tells the story of a fictional United Nations that begins to seriously take on the role of ensuring the survival of the human species.

I recently read Lord Jim (1900) by Joseph Conrad and really enjoyed it. There is a dense playfulness with words in a way that doesn't exist in my diet of Internet reading. The plot is unfurled from questionable narrators, deft time shifts, and overall is compelling and peppered with ethical dilemmas.

Standard E-books made an excellently formatted version: https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/joseph-conrad/lord-jim

Comment and then question.

- Scattered (How Attention Deficit Disorder originates and what you can do about it) by Gabor Mate

Question: how do folks discover new books to read — Goodeads? Friend recommendations? Book Clubs? Any other sort of niche, online recommendation engine? Podcasts?

Our local library has a "new" section on their website that sorts everything by date acquired. A couple times a year we page through it and request the interesting-looking books!
> how do folks discover new books to read

I do track all books I want to read and have read in Goodreads. And I sometimes learn about cool new books from others on there.

But mostly I have topics in mind I want to read about so I search lists online and reddit to find a good book on the topic.

Goodreads recommendations are decent; I can often find at least one related book I’ll want to read from a book I’ve read. My problem is exactly the opposite as yours: I can’t read books as fast as my backlog grows! Most of my recommendations come from Goodreads, discussions on HN, or one or two reader friends who make recommendations I like.

Oftentimes the books I read cover only part of a very large topic, and this leads me to seek out books covering the rest; for instance, I do not expect my interests in political/societal structure and economics will ever stop yielding new books to read.

I subscribe to the The New York Review of Books (nybooks.com) for in-depth reviews and also follow RSS feeds from The London and LA Review of Books.
I use the shortlists lists from awards I like (Hugo, nebula, locus, also the booker and Pulitzer lists but I tend to enjoy those less ) as well as/especially those for new authors. This also generates a list of authors I like. That gives a sort of web of trust, I enjoy n.k. jemisin, so books she recommends and endorses and has a blurb on is one I'll at least take a look at. And that's true for lots of other authors as well.

I have a local bookstore and browse the new releases and staff recommendations they have, and all together that can usually keep me busy.

For me it's a mix of:

1. News sites with book reviews. I read Vox's book critic reviews for a while, as well as my local paper's book review section. Definitely better for fiction or current events than other non-fiction.

2. Asking the people working at the bookstore. I'm consistently surprised by the breadth of book recommendations bookstore employees can give. Even asking for something incredibly specific (like "young adult fiction featuring a trans male protagonist" or "modern fantasy takes on mythologies other than Greek or Norse") usually yields a few interesting results. Again, better for fiction than technical non-fiction.

3. Friends, newsletters, and podcasts.

4. Wandering around bookstores, especially boutiques, and thumbing through the books on display. This still yields mostly new releases, but stretches me outside my comfort zone. I found both Paddling Your Own Canoe by Nick Offerman (entertaining) and Breathing Fire: Female Inmate Firefighters on the Front Lines by Jaime Lowe (well-researched non-fiction) this way.

"Out of the Software Crisis" by Baldur Bjarnason. It's about applying systems thinking to software projects. As a systems thinking novice I found it really interesting. https://softwarecrisis.baldurbjarnason.com/
Interesting, if I may, what would you read to become an expert on systems thinking?
Systems thinking is a whole field of research and ideas. There are lots of books, courses, papers, etc.
I would love a suggestion for 1 or 2 materials of advanced level, thanks!
This year I got into a history binge after I finally got around to reading Caro's Master of the Senate this January. It was so good I'm already ready to read it again.

I used to be scared of tackling big books because I don't feel strongly committed. But with these I did audiobooks for the first time, while cleaning and driving and cooking and it has made reading big books merely a matter of time.

Other than Caro's books this year, I really liked the three-volume Churchill biography by William Manchester. And the first two volumes of the Teddy Roosevelt biography by Edmund Morris.

The biography of Roosevelt is indeed very nice. I finished the first volume and looking forward to the other two.
Another vote for Caro's magisterial biography of LBJ. I read all 4 volumes this year, and cannot praise them highly enough - not just a masterful biography, but an exposition of the country and how it changed, plus penetrating analysis of power and how it is gained and used. Let us hope that Mr Caro finishes the 5th volume in 2023!

I also read Don Quixote this year - Edith Grossman's translation is excellent, capturing the joy of the original, and laugh-out-loud funny in places.

Early last year I read The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck. I found it deeply affecting. The quality of the writing is incredible and I enjoyed the structure which alternates progressing the main story and vignettes of life around the main characters. But mostly I was shocked to realize how little has changed in ~90 years in terms of worker exploitation and the ability to fall through the cracks in the USA.
More astonishing is that he wrote it in 100 days by hand and published almost exactly what came out of his mind on the first draft. If you find the scans of his manuscript, it's shocking how few changes he made.
This is one of the rare books I consider required reading for everyone
Yep, I have recommended it to many people this year and I rarely recommend books. It really has the ability to change perspectives for the better.
East of Eden is also a fantastic book. So much better and epic than the movie.
East of Eden was one of like 3 Steinbeck books I havent read. I finally got around to it this summer and it’s probably one of my favorite books now.
This book was too emotionally moving for me to finish
Lean Your Loneliness Slowly Against Mine by Klara Hveberg
Shame. I was drawn by the story after reading the summary, until the part where, she fell in love with a married man. I don't know what people find romantic about this nonsense and I hate this stupid trend. Why cannot romantic stories be nice and uncomplicated instead of always involving some stupid love triangle or people cheating on their partners?
> Why cannot romantic stories be nice and uncomplicated

Maybe that doesn't make an interesting book?

It's certainly possible to have 'happier' complications though, I think GP has a point. As one might enjoy crime drama, but not gratuitous violence, say.
> I think GP has a point

"I don't know what people find romantic about this nonsense"

It's fine to have different literary preferences than some other people. As you say, "one might enjoy crime drama, but not gratuitous violence". But to question the literary preferences of other people is an entirely different matter.

"I hate this stupid trend."

It's not a trend. Writers have been writing about love triangles and marital infidelity for literally centuries.

I think romance as a genre has changed though. Today's romance is multiple people being involved in some weird interplay between each other and that is the main focus of the story. Whereas romance from a century ago is more about two people fighting against adversity to be together or to remain together.
I wouldn't actually place this book in the "romance" genre.
I meant like past romantic novels, where the couple are in love and their love is "simple", but they both have to overcome some trouble together (poverty, family illness, migration, war, separation due to work, ...etc). That makes for a love story that I enjoy reading. I guess I'm too traditionally minded. I honestly think romance is dead, or at least so different from the past that it is unrecognizable to me. Sometimes I feel like I was born in the wrong century.
I wouldn't say this book is about a couple. It's about Rakel. If anything, it's more about the "couple" of Rakel and Sofia than Rakel and Jakob.
One book stuck out to me this year: Blindsight by Peter Watts.

What happens when humankind on the verge of post-scarcity suffers its first alien contact -- truly alien contact. A team of engineered humans is sent to meet them.

What really stuck out to me is how the content of the book could be applied to a potential AGI -- an alien, intelligent entity that we can't really understand and still have to interact with. I can't go further without delving into spoilers. It's really good. But, also, very bleak.

I really enjoyed this book as well. Just a heads up for anyone interested, there is a vampire character, which seems very out of place initially, but just something that needs to be accepted for the story. It does all kind of fit in by the end though.
To each their own, but I thought this book was at best just ok. Had some neat parts but overall I didn’t get very into it. To anyone reading this comment, it’s from 2006 btw, not that the OP specified new books in 2022.
This book gave me mixed feelings as well, spoilers ahead.

On the good side, I think the author is brilliant, the way he created this new race of aliens, how he explains their physiology, faster than what it takes for your brain to process images, their camouflage, how their body is a whole lens, their communication system, their way to accumulate energy, etc... that was amazing and worth reading.

On the bad side, I hated every character in the book, it's maybe expected to not like the protagonist with his "lack of empathy", but who makes a crew of such a bunch of uncooperative people, is like nobody wanted to do their job properly; All their conversations felt hostile, not sure how to put it, but I would expect a sense of wonder, curiosity and cooperation from the people sent to do a first alien contact.

The part that I disliked the most is how the human ship felt so abstract, they are in a ship, but everyone stays in some sort of independent tent, I thought this was my problem maybe I missed some key information about it, but after reading some critics, other people also have this feeling of disorientation.

Overall, it's worth it if you really like the genre, but not a must in my opinion.

If you like dense SF you'll like Watts. Specifically Watts is like Gibson, Banks, Stross etc. in that he has throwaway ideas in his books that would be the entire basis of a novel for lessor authors. With Blindsight most famously it's his Vampire character but also there's the character with beneficial split-personalities, "heaven", and more others may remember that have faded for me since I read the books 5+ years ago.

Incredible book and your post has reminded me that I need to reread it.

It's also free to read online: https://www.rifters.com/real/Blindsight.htm

This is definitely a book that stuck with me over the years. The concepts were very foreign and unusual at the time I read it, and I still find them novel to think about. Definitely in my top five recommendations for sci-fi reading.

I haven't read the book, just some plot spoilers, so take this with a big grain of salt: it seems to be yet another book that flatters the reader by positing that humans are relatively more sentient than other spacefaring species. Where are the books that posit the opposite (which I'd think is actually much more likely) ?
(Spoilers naturally)

Trying to summarize a half-remembered book, but the big revelation is that the aliens are not sentient at all. They are rather operating on instinct. The point of the book was more to discuss the nature of being human and is consciousness/sentience all that necessary. Lots of philosophical waxing on the nature of thought.

As to your question about other species, I think you are posing a rather challenging problem. How does an author write from the perspective of a being significantly more intelligent than themselves? Their actions and motivations become wholly alien as comprehension is not within our reach. One can justify any alien action as the unknowable motivations of a capacious god.

To paraphrase Arthur C Clarke, any sufficiently advanced alien species is indistinguishable from God. And in that spirit, Merry Christmas...
The Three-Body Problem is an iconic example of the opposite, with humans simply struggling to survive in a universe where every other space-faring species is vastly more intelligent.
Blind sight has been recommended enough times so I'll add a note about the sequel.

Watts wrote a loosely related sequel called Echopraxia that was not nearly as good as Blindsight but expands on some of the concepts. It was much more of a slog to read through and a bit confusing to follow the story and I had to force myself to finish it. If you are thinking of picking that up after reading Blindsight.

Both books have a good section after the story where Watts explains the research and citations of how he came up with the story. If you read that part it may break your brain in a questioning existence kind of way.

Heh, +1 on Blindsight and also on the sequel not being as good :) I think Watts had remarked something like, people complained there was not enough action, so he added more action. But based on the comments I keep seeing (and Amazon stars) people like it much less...
Here is another good thread from a few days ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33849267

Here is the list of some of the good books I read this year https://brajeshwar.com/2022/books/

Starting this year, instead of writing the list at the year-end, I have decided that I will just write as I read along. Besides the 5 odd I listed from a comment on this thread, here are others I have listed from other threads on Hackernews and Twitter. The URL is a pattern anyway, so it will be https://brajeshwar.com/2023/books/

- How to Be Perfect: The Correct Answer to Every Moral Question by Michael Schur, https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/How-to-Be-Perfect/Mic...

- [How to Stop Worrying and Start Living](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Stop_Worrying_and_Start...) is from the popular author [Dale Carnegie](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dale_Carnegie) of the [How to Win Friends and Influence People](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Win_Friends_and_Influen...) fame.

- A young girl's diary https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Diary_of_a_Young_Girl)

- Greenlights by [Matthew McConaughey](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_McConaughey)

- How Asia Works: Success and Failure In the World's Most Dynamic Region

- How the World Really Works: A Scientist’s Guide to Our Past, Present and Future by Vaclav Smil

- How To Talk: Siblings Without Rivalry by [Adele Faber](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adele_Faber)

- Impact Mapping: Making a big impact with software products and projects

- Monetizing Innovation: How Smart Companies Design the Product Around the Price

- Product-Led Growth: How to Build a Product That Sells Itself

- Rewire Your Anxious Brain: How to Use the Neuroscience of Fear to End Anxiety, Panic, and Worry

- The Courage To Be Disliked: How to free yourself, change your life and achieve real happiness

- [The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_th...) by [Douglas Adams](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Adams)

- [Windfall: The Booming Business of Global Warming](https://www.amazon.com/Windfall-Booming-Business-Global-Warm...) by [McKenzie Funk](https://www.mckenziefunk.com)

- The Book You Wish Your Parents Had Read: (and Your Children Will Be Glad That You Did) by Philippa Perry

dawn of everything by graeber & wengrow
(comment deleted)
The Secret Life of Trees. It's exactly what's written on the tin. I have lots of notes and I can't wait to go in the forest to look at trees.

If a book opens your eyes to something you used to ignore, it's a good book.

You might also like Entangled Life by Merlin Sheldrake. It's focused on fungi rather than trees, but has a similar outlook. Overall it's a bit more down to earth and factual (or at least it seems that way to me, having no special knowledge of the subject matter), but no less eye-opening or fun to read.
If I had to pick one book from 2022, I would definitely go with Carlo Rovelli’s “The Order of Time” https://amzn.to/3W4PdVG

In the book, Rovelli explores the concept of time and how it has been understood by scientists and philosophers throughout history. An intellectually stimulating and not overly technical read about the concept of a universe without time and some of the latest developments in Loop Quantum Gravity (Rovelli’s field of work).

I also have a blog post on my Top 10 books from last year: https://medium.data4sci.com/top-10-books-we-read-in-2022-c3d...

I’ll check this one out, thanks. You might enjoy “From Eternity To Here” by Sean Carroll, which is a pretty deep exploration of similar topics.
I’ll definitely check it out, thank you
I'm about 25% through this book and struggling with it a bit. It's interesting, for sure, but it's kinda just going in one ear out the other for me. Don't feel like i'm learning or gaining new insight. Not to say I'm an expert -- anything but -- but don't have much to takeaway from it yet. Will trudge along...
I wish there would be a similar book about uncertainty.
For the past three years, I’ve set the goal to read one more book than the goal I set the prior year. I started with one a month, so this year my goal was 14 books. Some of my favorites, in the order I read them:

The Body Electric by Dr. Robert Becker and The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur Firstenberg - these books made me aware of the impact electricity may have on life - including us! Much of these two books would likely be dismissed as quackery to most, but the implication of cancer, diabetes, and heart disease as piezoelectric illnesses, the idea that limbs can be regrown, in part by electric signaling, and the massive ecological issues associated with widespread electromagnetic radiation all were things I’d never have considered. Since the latter book made me aware, I haven’t been able to stop noticing the constant tinnitus I experience.

Walden by Henry David Thoreau - this had been on my list for a while. I finally reached a mental state where this felt like the right book to read next; I felt that technology had gone too far, and a simple life would be a better life. If nothing else, gleaning the perspective of a man almost two hundred years ago and seeing both how different and how similar the issues regarding technology were, made me feel far less alone, and enlightened me toward ways I could make progress in feeling liberated from the ever-increasing grasp of technology on my life.

Bullshit Jobs by David Graeber - after spending four years working on defense systems that, in a best-case scenario, will never be used, I felt my job was useless. I saw jobs in the tech field that I thought were worse than useless - social media developers, advertisement company developers, etc. What I didn’t see, and this book discusses, is the vast swath of workers in all fields who feel, who know, that their job is worthless too. The book discusses the vast impact that this has on human mental health and societal direction. Highly recommend.

10% Human by Alanna Collen - I find myself referencing this book very frequently. It is all about the power of microbes in the human body (they make up 90% of us, by cell count!). That small imbalances can cause illnesses and influence our thought processes, habits, and behaviors is starting to become mainstream scientific knowledge. The implications this has for treatment of illness and prevention of illness (e.g. avoiding unnecessary bouts of antibiotics, fecal transplants, the value of breast feeding and natural birth) excite me due to the improvement they can cause in human health and quality of life.

Debt: The First 5,000 Years by David Graeber - Does one have to pay their debts? What does it mean to owe someone a debt? What implications does the widespread holding of debt cause for our society? Is it morally right? All these questions and more are answered in this excellent book. It changed how I saw macroeconomics, and the structure of our society.

The Technological Society by Jacques Ellul - This book, written in the 1960s, is astonishingly prescient about the state of humans in relation to “technique”. While the end of the book’s predictions for the 21st century are wrong (more progress was expected than was delivered), that does not diminish the rest of this book’s observations that technology can cause a great deal of issues in our society.

I hope at least one person can experience the joy I have from reading one of these books. I’m looking forward to what I’ll learn from your recommendations.

Graeber, as well as being a horrible human being wasn’t much cop as a scholar. Bullshit jobs was tested empirically and it’s bullshit[1]. If you’re going to read Debt at least do yourself a favour and read some negative reviews first so you can see where he tries to put one over on you. See critical reception on Wikipedia[2] or the seminar on Crooked Timber where the discussants do back flips trying to be kind but can’t bring themselves not to challenge it[3]. His last book “The Dawn of Everything” is similarly careful, with experts realising that where they know what ours taking about it’s horseshit but giving the benefit of the doubt elsewhere[4].

[1] https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170211015067

Alienation Is Not ‘Bullshit’: An Empirical Critique of Graeber’s Theory of BS Jobs

[2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt:_The_First_5000_Years

[3] https://crookedtimber.org/category/david-graeber-debt-semina...

[4] https://www.persuasion.community/p/a-flawed-history-of-human...

> Graeber, as well as being a horrible human being

Whenever I hear or see such descriptions, I start discounting the opinions of those who made them, because they're often hyperbolic. I'd put someone like Genghis Khan at the level of being a "horrible human being," not some random author, because it indeed is a very high insult to levy against someone. That, or the person is just engaging in semantic drift [0].

Anyway, why was he a "horrible human being?" I couldn't find any controversy regarding his views or actions that would classify him as "horrible," at least in my limited search.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_change

I am about halfway through Journey to the Abyss: The Diaries of Count Harry Kessler 1880-1918. Kessler was an extremely well-traveled and well-connected person and his diaries follow him through ±1900-era Mexico, Japan, India, and then back in Europe amongst figures like Rodin, Nietzsche, Verlain, and others. It's a super interesting read if you're interested in turn of the century art and culture, and also for a behind-the-scenes look at the German upper class perspective of World War I.
This sounds super interesting, I plan to read it now. I read John Dos Passos: 42nd parallel (1930) and it's set during WWI. It was enlightening how similar problems are then and now. And made me realize there is so much WWII era knowledge and glorification in society, but much less about WWI.
I enjoyed "The Third Policeman" by Flann O'Brien, an author who died in the 60s but who had been completely unknown to me until this year. It's a short and very surreal novel, with an Irish dark tongue-in-cheek sense of humor.
If you haven't yet, treat yourself to The Poor Mouth and The Best of Myles.
Atomic Habits. It's basically the playbook to get whatever you want out of life.
I've read Tiny Habits by BJ Fogg this year, which is the original and really good. Can recommend.
+1 for going to the source. I once showed the author of Atomic Habits a picture of BF Skinner. He didn’t recognize who he was.
My best nonfiction read was The 1619 Project. It's a heavy read, but I highly recommend it. The runner up would be Christian Livermore's We Are Not OK.

Best fiction read was Tim Winton's Breath or (there's probably some recency bias at play here) Sebastian de Castel's Traitor's Blade.

I also read a few comic books. I love the East of West series (at least the first three books).

Wow! Immediately downvoted, on the topic of books?!? I wonder which one triggered such a negative reaction.
I don't know why you were downvoted, but your comment made me google some of the books to see if there's something to the recommendations. I don't know what the 1619 project is; but the first few google links are all adverts like

> What Is The 1619 Project? - The 1619 Project And Socialism

> 1619 Project Debunked - What parents should know.

So i assume there's a certain section that disagrees with the book so much that they're paying for ads to counter it! Maybe there's an answer lying there. i.e. it triggers the left versus right debate and hard!

American conservatives (myself included) generally dislike the book, for its incorrect account of the motives behind the American Revolution. But interestingly, many old-school economic leftists also disagree with it, as by incorrectly chalking up every historical injustice to "white supremacy", it obscures the economic forces that were the real driving factors. Some of the best rebuttals were published by the World Socialist Web Site, which is Trotskyist.
From what I heard, there have been a number of historians that aired concerns of factual issues pre-print who were ignored, and its marketed as a history book despite not being a history book.

One of the goals of propaganda is to cause disunity.

The idea being you divide people and conquer. You force people into psychological states where there are two minorities where some people don't react, and some who react violently at shadows, and it allows a smaller third group to do things that couldn't normally be done. That's the gist of it. You get them to that point by corrupting social norms, and other factors that make up individual and national identity. Its quite evil, and often uses sophisticated techniques that are designed to work on psychological blindspots we all have, the only defense for that type of material, is to limit exposure and view that material with critical thought and attention.

Obviously this kind of content would be harmful to any children younger than 12 as they would lack the developmental faculties needed to discern lies from truth and just accept what is provided.

Many people consider The 1619 Project to be politically-biased fiction.

I have no opinion myself (haven't read the book, don't know much beyond the official grade school history curriculum), but some of the criticisms come from superficially reasonable people.

If you take the book content to be meaningful, you should at least survey the criticisms. Of course you'll want to ignore the virulently anti brigade, which is numerous, very loud, and insufferably stupid.

Did not downvote. I think this is what the downvoters meant. As a reader, you deserve an explanation, IMO.

Well, all I'll say is, it is not surprising.

Subversive content in general tends to get that reaction from intelligent people and that book is more rightly considered propaganda than actual history.

If you understand what propaganda is, what its goals are, and can recognize it easily you probably wouldn't have been blindsided.

"The 1619 project" purports to demonstrate that the primary motivation behind the American Revolution was to preserve slavery in the 13 colonies. But this conclusion is false, not supported by the evidece. And, interestingly, some of the best rebuttals of it were published by the World Socialist Web Site, a Trotskyist publication:

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/09/06/1619-s06.html

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/11/14/mcph-n14.html

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/11/28/wood-n28.html

> My best nonfiction read was The 1619 Project. It's a heavy read, but I highly recommend it. The runner up would be Christian Livermore's We Are Not OK.

lmao

Fiction: - Lost Children Archive by Valeria Luiselli: mixes the personal and political so skillfully - The Magician by Colm Tóibín: Thomas Mann, the German, author is the main character. Shows our own moment in history in relief.

Non-Fiction, work: - The Pragmatic Programmer, 20th Anniversary Edition by David Thomas, Andrew Hunt: I’m not a programmer and still found this one of the most useful books I read this year. - Working Backwards by Colin Bryar, Bill Carr: The Amazon/Bezos love choked me a couple of times but I’ve put in practice some of what learned in this book to good effect.

Non-Fiction, history: - Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin by Timothy D. Snyder: This is a hard book to read. Not slow hard. Terrifying and apocalyptic and true hard. Gives a lot of context to current events. - The Enemy of All Mankind by Steven Johnson: Pirates. The seafaring kind.

I finally read Lord of the Rings this year, in my mid-thirties. Enjoyed it a lot. Recommend it if you haven't read it.
Did not read that many books this year but this two books makes my list:

1)The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lady_Tasting_Tea This book is about the history of Statistics which is weaved through the some remarkable personal stories behind the history of Statistics. If you have ever used statistics, some of the words will sound familiar and will help to understand the history behind it.

2)The Song of the Cell: An Exploration of Medicine and the New Human https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/The-Song-of-the-Cell/... I am still reading this book but I have read his previous book, "The Emperor of All Maladies" so knew his style. Again I enjoy historical perspective and this one tells about how we thought of the cell. It almost reads like textbook but is much interesting read than textbook. Brought some of the memories from my cell biology class. Always fascinating on how we take some things for granted such as blood transfusion came along in first place. He also narrates some his personal experience in between to make it even more readable.

In short, I love tech and biology sparkled with history.

The Song of the Cell is on my list for 2023. My local library has ordered few more copies after they realized the demand for this book. I have been waiting more than a month and my expected waiting time is another month!
I'm very interested in The Song of the Cell, thanks, I love books like that and I tried to read The Emperor of All Maladies and I enjoyed the writing but I just couldn't keep reading, Cancer and terminal illnesses just terrify me, that was truly a horror book for me.
2022 was a year full of change for me and I am not looking for change but more of a complement to my life as it is currently.

In the process of reading:

Parable of a Sower’s Daughter by Octavia Butler

Read this year:

The Book of Form and Emptiness by Ruth Ozeki

The Psychopath Test by Jon Ronson

Four Thousand Weeks by Oliver Burkeman

A Tale for the Time Being by Ruth Ozeki

Sea of Tranquillity by Emily St. John Mandel

Children of Dune by Frank Herbert

Turtles All the Way Down by John Green

The Three-Body Problem by Cixin Liu

Station Eleven by Emily St. John Mandel

Your 'Read this year' list looks a lot like my 'Want to read next year' list.

Any standouts from the lot?

These were all wonderful books to read.

My top three were:

1. Four Thousand Weeks

2. The Book of Form and Emptiness

3. The Three-Body Problem