Were there a higher percentage of Israeli startups than startups from other nationalities? I'm not sure I see the point of this submission vs the sea of other SVB threads on here over the last few days.
Country Number of Startups
The USA 72,560
India 13,905
The UK 6,396
Canada 3,446
Australia 2,399
Indonesia 2,391
Germany 2,320
France 1,579
Spain 1,411
Brazil 1,165
I think he's speaking of the _state sponsored_ cyber security, offensive tooling and exploit creation _start ups_.
> Israel has earned its reputation as ‘the start-up’ nation, accommodating 97 unicorns each valued over $1bn, according to global Israeli startup founders club Techaviv.
scylladb is one of the most technologically sophisticated companies in the world and their team has more expertise with the linux kernel and distributed systems than anyone even 100X their size in california. to claim that expertise in one technical field doesnt translate to others is just ignorant.
Many need SVB, we (ScyllaDB) received a great service from them in the past. Later on we just used them as one of our banks, obviously, going forward, we're diversifying our services.
The problem for startups is that debt provider who are also a bank require to move most of the business to that provider. It's not the case other types of debt providers.
w.r.t debt - everybody use this mechanism, doesn't matter if you're small or big.
But more importantly, in general, for Israelis, the goal is always to break into bigger markets such as the USA and Europe with branches there and thus may be really affected by USA banks. Wonder if it is the same for Startups in Germany or India that have big market domestically.
Edit: SVB has branches [2] in 8 countries outside the US with Israel among them. So we can guess Israel startups had enough money in it (among the other 7) to be affected by the collapse.
A more useful measure of potential impact might be number of startups per capita, or number of people employed by startups per capita. Not in front of laptop right but might have a go later if no one gets to it first.
Israel has only 9 million people, so in absolute terms it will still be small, but in relative terms, it punches hugely above its weight. It also depends on methodology; I am mostly familiar with Canada but am generally confused how 3446 would be produced, unless you’re counting very generously. (I can’t imagine the largest centers have more than 300-500 serious startups.) I’d propose that an easier metric might be looking at venture investment in the area; for example, this is on the first page of a quick search [1].
I don't think SVB going bust is generally a big problem for a foreign startups that banked there. This is because typically(?) they are structured so that their US subsidiary has account there, not the main company. And especially if the US subsidiary is on the red, the US accounts for the foreign startup pretty much hold enough cash to do next payroll.
What these Israeli startups appear to have done is something entirely different and I truly sympathize and feel sorry for them for all the money lost. One might even argue that 'no good deed goes unpunished'.
> Were there a higher percentage of Israeli startups than startups from other nationalities? I'm not sure I see the point of this submission vs the sea of other SVB threads on here over the last few days.
There's nothing unusual about highlighting regional coverage of a topic, and said regional coverage is going to have a regional focus.
California companies affected by SVB's collapse are getting all the attention, but this is more evidence that it may have even more impact outside the US. British examples:
Hunt's comments are much more serious than what Janet Yellen has been saying. Perhaps UK startups had no alternatives to SVB UK, while in the US there were and are other banks willing to take on unprofitable companies as clients?
Israeli companies have an large footprint in the computer security world that employs a lot of Americans. Many people were thinking this was an American problem on Friday and are now realizing this has world wide ramifications.
31 comments
[ 0.21 ms ] story [ 82.8 ms ] thread> Israel has earned its reputation as ‘the start-up’ nation, accommodating 97 unicorns each valued over $1bn, according to global Israeli startup founders club Techaviv.
https://www.checkpoint.com/press-releases/check-point-softwa...
The problem for startups is that debt provider who are also a bank require to move most of the business to that provider. It's not the case other types of debt providers. w.r.t debt - everybody use this mechanism, doesn't matter if you're small or big.
[1] https://news.crunchbase.com/startups/countries-most-startup-...
But more importantly, in general, for Israelis, the goal is always to break into bigger markets such as the USA and Europe with branches there and thus may be really affected by USA banks. Wonder if it is the same for Startups in Germany or India that have big market domestically.
Edit: SVB has branches [2] in 8 countries outside the US with Israel among them. So we can guess Israel startups had enough money in it (among the other 7) to be affected by the collapse.
[2] https://www.svb.com/locations
[1] https://www.inc.com/peter-cohan/why-israel-drew-28-times-mor...
Per capita
is a thing
chud incel
What these Israeli startups appear to have done is something entirely different and I truly sympathize and feel sorry for them for all the money lost. One might even argue that 'no good deed goes unpunished'.
There's nothing unusual about highlighting regional coverage of a topic, and said regional coverage is going to have a regional focus.
California companies affected by SVB's collapse are getting all the attention, but this is more evidence that it may have even more impact outside the US. British examples:
"'We can’t make payroll': scores of London tech firms in cash crisis amid Silicon Valley Bank collapse" <https://np.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/11olit9/we_ca...>
"Silicon Valley Bank collapse: UK tech firms at 'serious risk' from failure, warns Chancellor Jeremy Hunt" <https://np.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/11pck3w/silic...>
Hunt's comments are much more serious than what Janet Yellen has been saying. Perhaps UK startups had no alternatives to SVB UK, while in the US there were and are other banks willing to take on unprofitable companies as clients?
And many HN'ers don't realize that SVB's fall will directly affect tiny cash strapped startups, so the article strikes a nerve.
Besides, the article is short and well written. And its closing line should be framed:
> SVB CEO Greg Becker said on Thursday: “I ask everyone to relax and support us as we supported you in difficult times.”
> And you thought bankers didn’t have a sense of humor.