[dead]
the question should be: ''why aren't any other governments doing that?''
good
>If the electricity for a vertical farm is supplied by solar panels so use nuclear
surprisedpichaku.jpg
cyberpunk 2077 development is a warning about the future
that's obviously false, alien would never contact israel or usa
me too
the world need both a green deal to de-carbonize and electrify other sectors and a nuclear new deal to provide the necessary energy
nuclear is practically the only option to completly decarbonize our energy not only electricy but transport , heat and industry , renwebles can't produce energy continuosly and are more expensive than nucleare so they…
sure still the nuclear arsenal is in the hand of an unstable and probably mentally hill individual
you are completely right
that doesn't change the fact that tolerance should be limited
no you take that sentence out of context
''new method of keeping the lights on if the world turns to 100% clean, renewable energy'' probably bs ''New research by Mark Z. Jacobson'' ok this is surely bs
this is bullshit ,scientifically a process is irrelevant ,glyphosate is safe
>Better solar, wind, etc., has fewer risks than better nuclear tech in the long run. no https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/06/10/energys-d...
>That has little to do with the decommissioning itself, yes they cut the main source of green energy
>The worst of the lies about nuclear is that it can somehow help create a carbon-neutral economy. Of course it wouldn't nope
> That cost is not reflected in current electric rates nope ''In fact, the carbon-intensity of French electricity has increased. After years of subsidies for solar and wind, France’s 2017 emissions of 68g/CO2 per kWh…
>Shellenberger has zero credibility. not an argument , bring proofs he's wrong
>Solar costs have fallen very rapidly. proof? beacuse using solar and wind bring a rise in the cost of energy https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/02/05...
that's not the only cost of renewables,look at germany and france https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/02/05...
https://www.iea.org/statistics/?country=WORLD&year=2016&cate...
>a sizeable area becomes inhabitable for centuries Well no, reactors in chernobyl remained operative until 2000 ,and chernobyl is not inhabitable look at all the animals that live there , the level of radiation is…
[dead]
the question should be: ''why aren't any other governments doing that?''
good
>If the electricity for a vertical farm is supplied by solar panels so use nuclear
surprisedpichaku.jpg
cyberpunk 2077 development is a warning about the future
that's obviously false, alien would never contact israel or usa
me too
the world need both a green deal to de-carbonize and electrify other sectors and a nuclear new deal to provide the necessary energy
nuclear is practically the only option to completly decarbonize our energy not only electricy but transport , heat and industry , renwebles can't produce energy continuosly and are more expensive than nucleare so they…
sure still the nuclear arsenal is in the hand of an unstable and probably mentally hill individual
you are completely right
that doesn't change the fact that tolerance should be limited
no you take that sentence out of context
''new method of keeping the lights on if the world turns to 100% clean, renewable energy'' probably bs ''New research by Mark Z. Jacobson'' ok this is surely bs
this is bullshit ,scientifically a process is irrelevant ,glyphosate is safe
>Better solar, wind, etc., has fewer risks than better nuclear tech in the long run. no https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/06/10/energys-d...
>That has little to do with the decommissioning itself, yes they cut the main source of green energy
>The worst of the lies about nuclear is that it can somehow help create a carbon-neutral economy. Of course it wouldn't nope
> That cost is not reflected in current electric rates nope ''In fact, the carbon-intensity of French electricity has increased. After years of subsidies for solar and wind, France’s 2017 emissions of 68g/CO2 per kWh…
>Shellenberger has zero credibility. not an argument , bring proofs he's wrong
>Solar costs have fallen very rapidly. proof? beacuse using solar and wind bring a rise in the cost of energy https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/02/05...
that's not the only cost of renewables,look at germany and france https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/02/05...
https://www.iea.org/statistics/?country=WORLD&year=2016&cate...
>a sizeable area becomes inhabitable for centuries Well no, reactors in chernobyl remained operative until 2000 ,and chernobyl is not inhabitable look at all the animals that live there , the level of radiation is…