Ask HN: Is the internet as we knew it, dead?
Just looking at the major websites, I can't help but think that they're increasingly getting locked down and heavily monetized. Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, Pinterest, Tiktok, etc.
What went wrong? Why did we go from having a world-wide web that used to be freely accessible to everyone, to a set of silos that only serve money generating customers?
How did we go from a proliferation of ideas in the form of various websites and forums to centralized gated websites (e.g., Reddit)?
33 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 69.9 ms ] threadhttps://www.newyorker.com/cartoon/a16995
This costs money, especially at scale. As much as people hate it, nobody has solved the problem of how news organizations or most digital content platforms can actually make money.
there are still websites/forums with just thousands of users for decades.
They could also put affiliate marketing on Reddit sidebars and share profits with moderators and community regular contributors.
On porn subs they could use the ads porn sites use that are annoying, but it's porn so who cares.
They could create some sort of YouTube player with their own pre-roll ads for embeds. They could create a premium plan that actually has value, like tools for business and marketing to schedule posts to multiple subreddits, and get feedback on if the post will be moderated before it even gets posted.
They could've given every profile it's own link tree, and created an onlyfans competitor so onlyfans models could just do all their work on Reddit itself.
I've got 50 more ideas to monetize the shit out of Reddit, the admins are just too stupid to get anything done and figure this out. Many other business leaders could have made Reddit successful.
Facebook and Reddit aren't a lot different and Facebook is one of the biggest companies on the planet.
it's not a coincidence that all these companies are locking down APIs, fighting against scraping, and doing other cost cutting measures at the expense of users, all at the same time. You can't raise money easily anymore, so showing revenue is more important than user count or other fluff metrics
So I'll ask you a question:
It didn't simply happen all at once. It's been going on since the inception of the world wide web. Are you really surprised?
Just like there will probably be humans even if we have a nuclear Armageddon, just a fraction of normal.
I'm most worried about the social contract between ai, search engines, and websites. How can websites provide valuable content if nobody goes to it, thus creating a loop causing most websites that run on advertising to die and that will definitely be a blow.
Tldr: is it dead? no IMHO, but it could become a ghost town with small remnants of community, however there is a chance for another shakeup, Ready player one becomes a reality and we basically socialize in VR worlds that aren't just voxels, etc but real world graphics thanks to ai generation.
It's both a scary and exciting time to be alive, AI can speed up technological advancement, maybe we get to the singularity and the Internet is the least of our worries. Maybe they not only cure aging but reverse it, as well as poverty.
YouTube in particular simply isn't possible without monetization, a substantial amount of that money at least does go to the creator.
Also for things like reddit and Twitter, lazy users is the real truth. Instead of having to locate the forum for your obscure topic, you just see if there's on on reddit and call it a day.
Pattern keeps repeating and it's not just post-2008 tech companies.
The web was riding a wave of monetized eyeballs, and the value extraction from it has become incredibly … bad. With people having gotten used to the internet, ads gotten more aggressive, more people using adblock etc etc the "free content" industry is in a race to the bottom, they long since reached the bottom and are now fighting over shovels.
The LLM explosion is the spark in the powder keg. Now those companies with broken business models have execs pressured by investors seeing the end of the free ride. A lot of money is riding away from this model purely based on (reasonably justified) fear.
What's next? Well, predicting the future is difficult, but IMO it's reasonable to think that high quality human content will now come at a premium. For example, subscriber-only communities (be it pay-gated, or gated in some other way… login-only won't cut it for long IMO).
The pendulum will swing the other way until someone once again finds and popularizes a push for free and open content, and the cycle will begin anew.
I used this for decades to reduce the load on spamassassin. I took 12 inbound postfix servers from an average run queue of 8+ down to 0.x. It takes some tuning to get rid of false positives and to allow people that break RFC1912.
[1] - http://www.gabacho-net.jp/en/anti-spam/anti-spam-system.html
Virtual reality is still reality. The early internet that we experienced in 90s felt so different from real world, because it was a new media and real world powers had not yet expand their influence into it yet, but eventually they will. Censorship, speech control, propaganda, commercialization, etc and etc, everything will be there. To the point the new media/platform/reality becomes no different from outside world.
People are excited about VR technology recently. I am not. It would be the same damn story again.
https://flarum.org/