Tell HN: Anima/Shun (YC W21) Considered Harmful
Unfortunately, I came across a reddit post that made me realize something [1]. Anima, a YC backed company, used the Who Wants to Be Hired Thread to mass-send the same email while writing it to look personalized and did so month after month. I think this is not behavior that the community wants to condone or encourage.
Shun's email to chater00:
https://gist.github.com/assets/13973198/8698a343-f2cd-4df8-8d2c-6724f81005fb
Why would Anima do this?
Reddit user cheater00 posted their email interaction with Shun [1] that took place after the January thread. They replied to Shun but never got a response. This suggests Shun mass-emailed everybody and didn't have the bandwidth to reply to emails, much less actually look at any of the applications.
Shun also did not reply to my email response in early December. I am not "salty" for being ghosted, I now have a really nice job, but I find this behavior of doing "growth" hacking disgusting.
Shun's email to me: https://gist.github.com/assets/13973198/1ff7527b-c9d9-43eb-a394-05b9da41b270
If you look at Anima's hiring page in the email, they mention the 0.5% - 0.8% hiring rate with Pride. I don't mind them being selective, but they're wasting so many HNer's time to get this vanity metric.
https://gist.github.com/assets/13973198/3a317bdb-0354-4c1b-89c7-b47a6102cfd2
---
[1]: https://old.reddit.com/r/recruitinghell/comments/193fv5q/i_finally_figured_it_out_i_know_why_companies/?ref=share&ref_source=link
15 comments
[ 2.2 ms ] story [ 37.1 ms ] threadhave at it, let’s cancel Anima and pretend this is a unique problem until it is
If it was written to be less personal to make it clear that it's sent in mass then that'd be okay.
Anyways my story: Got auto reachout from Shun. I made it partway down the funnel after providing a pretty thoughtful (in my opinion) application. I took the automated code exam and figured I didn't do so well.
1-2 months down the line, another hiring thread, another auto email from Shun. I replied fairly salty, saying "It's great you've reconsidered!" then proceeding to say at least have the decency to remove rejected candidates from your auto emails.
I tend to agree with the OP. The potential employer is starting the relationship on a deceitful basis.
There's a reason people absolutely drag recruiters who do this - it's because it's slimy. At least with a recruiter, the company has a degree of insulation.
If the CEO is going to send emails claiming they've pre-screened you, are excited about talking to you and that they will get back to you if you submit an application, then it's reasonable for people to call them out when they don't do this.
I agree not responding is not a good look. But this is a lot of huff and puff for what is industry standard.