35 comments

[ 5.0 ms ] story [ 73.8 ms ] thread
Why not? It’s not like PBS isn’t in schools.
Have you actually seen their videos? They are far from the quality you get from PBS. Fact checking Prager U videos often takes 30+ min to go over a 5-10 min video.
Assuming, of course, you trust the fact checkers.

Not just in what they flag in Prager or whatever online source (I don’t really care), but also in what they don’t flag PBS or VOA for.

Well, do you believe in an external reality?
Good for them and the parents.
[flagged]
The future GDP growth of the country is going to come from the people (and their kids) who are smart enough to not buy into this nonsense while everyone else will be stuck in a lower class of their own making.

More of these people are likely to emerge from the 'woke' states because people who are going somewhere in life don't care to partake in this game.

>A while back the right and the left used to trust in science and scientists. Now noone does anymore and truth itself is for sale.

How long is 'a while back'? The right has been bashing science for the 30 odd years i've been alive.

What does "full woke" mean to you and where did you come upon that definition?
> All of this nonsense is because scientists lost their moral standing by cheating, lying and going full woke

So Ozempic is just propaganda then? MRNA vaccines too? CRISPR? CAR-Ts? LLMs? EV Batteries? Nike Alpha Flys? Superconductors?

Hate to break it to you, but we are in a golden age of science especially in Biotech.

I believe that they're implying is that some have lost track of what the scientific method actually dictates and allows. For example, it's no longer permissible to ask questions about certain things, and that if you do ask questions you risk being cancelled.

Yes, there has been breakthrough technologies. But Science - upper case S intentional - has also had breakdowns.

> For example, it's no longer permissible to ask questions about certain things, and that if you do ask questions you risk being cancelled.

And you believe this is a new thing? Since when? After Galileo, certainly.

New? No. But the blatant canceling in a mass scale gaslighting sorta way *is* new.

And I'm only try to explain that other comment, not condone it or condem it.

Ozempic is definitely not just propaganda -- there's good research and outcomes to back it's effects.

There HAVE been some questions as to how it works (and that the traditional understanding might be wrong), but...

Oh NPR. Notice how the headline characterizes an adversarial relationship. Alt headline “PragerU is introducing diversity into schools that’s more than skin deep.”
How important is it to teach and model unkindness, right alongside kindness?
Socialism and its more authoritarian affiliates are not kindness. They bear false witness in economics, consolidate social power, crush the human spirit, and typically end in nihilistic, untethered depravity.
Capitalism as practiced by the US has included selling humans to the highest bidder; I can think of nothing more soul-crushing than that.
Capitalism and freedom live in union. All forms of socialism involve slavery.
> All forms of socialism involve slavery.

They don't.

Get a grip, you've drunk the Kool-Aid.
Odd phrasing here, given the allusion to Jim Jones, the avowed Socialist.
Looking at PragerU's site is a trip. And you get about a paragraph down before there is a funding nag banner.
> The conservative media nonprofit makes short, well-produced videos crafted to appeal to college students and young people. It has polished animations and titles like "What Radical Islam and the Woke Have in Common" and "Is There Really a Climate Emergency?"

> Educators have voiced alarms about the tone and accuracy of some of PragerU's videos, such as one that features an animated Christopher Columbus saying: "Being taken as a slave is better than being killed, no? I don't see the problem."

Wow, that's some bold choice of words they've used.

That's not really the correct metric. It seems bold by today's standards, but is it something Columbus would have likely thought at the time? It doesn't seem that far off to me given the prevailing mindsets of the time.