The first thing my mind jumps to is a boss asking their new Slack AI assistant for a list of employees who have used Slack to speak negatively about the boss or company... and that's the new list of people to lay off.
"SolidGoldMagikarp, you did our business good service. Unfortunately, preliminary research has correlated you with over a thousand instances of under-performance and a number of disparaging claims we hesitate to repeat here. First we intend to ask you to resign, and if you refu- wait, what do you mean the call is empty?"
My company has some kind of system to try and alert managers when an employee is at risk of leaving, but I have on idea what they are using to determine that. I've been at risk for a while and no one has talked to me about it.
Happens. My team was starting to get weird and found the sociopath malcontent by digging through the Mattermost database. Mattermost does make it hard, in their favor.
Such law already exists and it goes like this: if you don't want your data to be used don't post it on the Internet. It works perfectly. Every single time. Try it.
13 comments
[ 4.0 ms ] story [ 55.5 ms ] threadI don't see industrial scale privacy laundering is any different to the current industrial scale copyright laundering by the parasitic tech companies
https://new.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/v3b2mn/microsoft_...
Thankfully they pulled it.
But it's a line in the sand that shouldn't be crossed, yet slowly the line is being moved.
Same with most health information.
Or your child’s beach pictures.
I do not think I should be allowed to access or use any of that without your consent