If I were Funnyjunk, I'd be seriously considering getting another lawyer. I'd almost consider it performance art, but parts of the situation are in bat country and it's going to skew the case horribly.
Always great when people think they know how the world works stumble into something they clearly don't understand. And instead of trying to understand it, or admitting they don't get it, they flail around using their old tricks.
Carreon's reaction of ridiculous lawsuits and bizarre poetry reminds me of a study I read about a few years ago. IIRC the study brought in narcissists under the guise of a television interview. The "interviewer" would prod the narcissist verbally until he would explode in anger resulting in him yelling and screaming at the interviewer. When they allowed the narcissist to review the tape of the interview to have the final say on whether or not it airs on television, the narcissist would be believe that he performed well in the interview and allow it to air.
Unfortunately for Carreon, his display of narcissism is now well documented on the internet. When we live in an age where it is almost standard to google somebody before using their services, such a display does not put him in good light.
Am I the only one here who thinks that based on his acting as counsel pro se on the original lawsuit, that Carreon owns Funny Junk, and that's why the BearLove thing made him lose any remaining objectivity he might have had?
8 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 26.1 ms ] threadIt may just be Cameron. Or, he could be somehow entangled with the real founders (best friend, relative, etc.)
Unfortunately for Carreon, his display of narcissism is now well documented on the internet. When we live in an age where it is almost standard to google somebody before using their services, such a display does not put him in good light.