LinkedIn is the worst social media I've ever seen

277 points by bitreducer ↗ HN
Besides being full of AI-generated, useless content, the platform is also riddled with dark patterns.

I'm a newcomer, I’d never used LinkedIn before until I joined three months ago. Since then, I've been banned twice and shadow-banned several times.

1) Right after I created my account, I got shadow-banned. My friends couldn’t find me, and my profile wasn’t accessible via direct link. This issue wasn’t resolved until I contacted support; they confirmed that restrictions had been placed on my account and then removed them.

2) I shouldn’t even have to mention this, but as a professional in my field, after that incident I always ended up on the very last pages of search results for keywords related to my field. People without those keywords in their resumes, or whose work isn’t at all related to the field, kept being ranked ahead of me. I can’t say I was deliberately pessimized, but that’s exactly how it appears.

3) Some time later, I decided to get Premium and paid with my own card (issued in another country, with the same name as on my profile and my passport). That’s when I received the first restriction: I was locked out of my account and couldn’t sign in until I contacted support. They made me take a photo of myself and of my passport, and after that they lifted the restrictions and apologized.

4) Everything seemed to be going along normally, yet I remained stuck on the last pages of search, being outranked by completely irrelevant profiles, until I decided to write a post about my own article on Medium. Immediately after publishing the post with a link to Medium, I received a second restriction. I was locked out of my account, couldn’t access my messages or interview invitations, and even missed a call because of this. They once again required me to submit a photo of myself along with a copy of my passport. Although they eventually restored my account, this time the process took 4–5 days, which caused me to miss an interview.

5) Now my profile is accessible via direct link, but I’ve disappeared from search. No one can find me, and hardly anyone visits my page. My post was hidden while support was "sorting out" my account, and I lost all the potential post views it would have gained because it wasn't featured in the recommendations.

All of this happened within the first three months of using LinkedIn. I’ve never seen a more appalling social media, one so full of dark patterns and outright abuse towards its users, forcing them through humiliating identity verification processes and hiding them from search.

Needless to say, I have never violated any of the platform’s rules. I don’t spam, I don’t bother people, and I don’t advertise anything. Meanwhile, my friend, whose account is over five years old—can do whatever he wants. He uses VPNs, changes his profile location several times a week, and switches his VPN location from Dubai to Europe multiple times a day without ever facing any restrictions.

And yes, I completely forgot to add: when your account gets restricted, it doesn’t matter whether you’re a premium user or not — the treatment is equally poor and the response is equally slow.

I’ve never seen a worse social media, and I’d be thrilled if a worthy competitor to LinkedIn ever emerged, I’d be one of the first to join.

BONUS: This content was originally posted on reddit, quickly became popular in the LinkedIn subreddit and was then deleted by moderator who works for M$ (which owns LinkedIn). Frankly, it feels like the whole LinkedIn subreddit is highly censored by him.

136 comments

[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 197 ms ] thread
Oh the irony: The submission was default hidden but I hang out on the https://news.ycombinator.com/newest page and vouched for it. So another example of automated blocking rules for a new user account.
It's funny since if it were any other platform, it would have collapsed by now. But because we all use it to find work, well, what other choice do we have? Sure, most of us don't post, but we're still clicking on the website, and we're still seeing the feed -- apparently that's enough for advertisers, for now.
> we all use it to find work

For what it is worth, I do not. I have only had an account there for a brief period of time when I was first looking for a job after university. Then, when Microsoft bought it, I deleted my account.

When I was looking for a job afterwards, I had to go on an active look-out. I reached out to 10s of companies manually. I got ignored or immediately rejected most of the time. My success rate from me reaching out to an actual offer was about 3 %. But I guess for an average person that is to be expected.

Looking for any job is easy. Looking for a good job takes time.

"My success rate from me reaching out to an actual offer was about 3 %"

Back in the olden days that hit rate would have seemed quite normal. I can remember mailing (mail not email) 20-100 letters with CVs for job applications. Each covering letter was hand signed and some were personalised for the target. Each envelope would have had something like a 30p stamp on it and running my printer was rather more expensive and slower than now.

That was the early 1990s in the UK.

[Edit: grammar]

These days looking for any job is hard especially if you are looking for remote only.
Allowing you to sign up and then immediately locking or shadow banning your account is a dark pattern to force you to provide a mobile phone number or other identification (for extra advertising targeting of course).
Nah. Shadowbanned users normally don't even realise they're shadow-banned; it's not a growth hacking strategy, and the point of ID is to validate details already provided for advertiser filtering. It doesn't even push the "verification" feature particularly hard. OP is unlucky enough to have IDs that span a couple of countries so probably triggers some half-baked algorithm aiming at weeding out fake profiles (LinkedIn loves AI slop, but it's in the business of selling expensive ways of messaging people, so it doesn't want too many fake profiles).

Not that LinkedIn has great ethics around dark patterns: LinkedIn's original dark pattern growth hacks like the "find contacts" feature linked to your email that made it very easy to accidentally send connection requests to anyone you'd ever been included in an email chain with were particularly inappropriate and the "someone from x looked at your profile" stuff always strikes me as a bit creepy. But nobody shadowbans users as part of their growth funnel.

And whilst LinkedIn is actually surprisingly useless for genuine business conversation, I'm not sure the mad people recounting Things That Didn't Happen which impart Important Business Lessons for likes are any worse than that sort of person on other social networks pushing much weirder and angrier stuff these days....

Recently I came to the conclusion that I needed to change jobs, but I held off because I didn't want to deal with the psychotic ramblings of LinkedIn posters. I'm sure in real life they are all perfectly normal indiviuals but something about LinkedIn insists that every poorly worded fable is gateway to wisdom, that methaphorical socratic dialog is to mechanism to describe human behaviour, and starting every second post with 'I'm sure this is a contraversional opinion but hear me out...'

In the end I got fired, so I'm actually forced back into the LinkedIn maelstrom of mediocrity but against my will, and without even the grace of my own grim resignation to spur me in to action.

Are you? Does anyone find a job with LinkedIn? They were sort of heading in that direction for a while, but don't seem to be anymore.
It's the primary method for connecting with recruiters, and all the jobs I've had in the past fifteen years have been due to connections through LinkedIn.

It's not "social media" in the same vein as other platforms.

I almost feel like it's two things -- the recruiter interface that you mention, and separately a social network where people are posting about their professional, and even personal, achievements and adventures -- true or imagined -- completely separate from the recruiting part but sharing a brand and identity provider.
Depends where you are. LinkedIn is absolutely the only place to go for tech jobs in Australia for example.
You can use LinkedIn for job search and completely ignore the posters. There are relatively fine-grained settings of what to get notified about.

I’m not saying that LinkedIn is great, but the post feed is entirely optional.

> There are relatively fine-grained settings of what to get notified about.

Anecdotal, but it seems the mobile app resets those settings every so often so you start to get spammed with crap you don't want to read.

I eventually just blocked the linkedin app from sending any notifications and rely on the emails which I have filters on.

And here I am thinking about deactivating my Linkedin profile for good. That platform has never been useful, most people use it to spy on others.
I'd have to login again for the first time in over a decade to do that. I probably should be I have better things to do than figure out my password.
My linked-in is 10 years out of date, and I agree that killing it off is mighty attractive.

Does anybody here have any experience searching for jobs without a linked-in? I'd be curious to know how much an effect that would have on future job searches.

Over the past few years it has become more important to many recruiters. The idea that your network is your net worth is unfortunately a common belief.
I deleted my account fifteen or so years back, and it's worked out fine. I talk with friends to see if they've heard about anything interesting, and I look around for companies working on whatever it is I think I might like to do next, then try to get in touch. It's never taken more than a couple of months to find something.
linkedin is still the defacto way to quickly check if a candidate is being truthful about their employment history.

If they don't list the companies they claim to have worked at or have no connections to them its a red flag.

I think providing references after passing the interviews works very well too.
I did and it took ages for the damn thing to die off. It kept on resurrecting itself! I dare not try to login to it just in case it arises again.

Prepare for a long mission!

You will not regret it. You will not miss it. I did the same to LinkedIn a couple of years ago, and just recently left FaceCrook and Twitter.
> most people use it to spy on others.

ThatsThePoint.jpg

Most people are only there because they are finding a job. When I have a job I just can’t be bothered with LinkedIn
Same here. LinkedIn is the labor market masquerading as social media. It isn't really "social" in any meaningful sense of that word.
Ran into a similar ban recently and it has infuriated me to a level I have trouble describing - except I've been a paying user of this site for 10+ years. It seems to me what triggered it was enabling MFA + password change, which is a completely normal thing to do. It also seems like they're flagging people for VPN usage now. Persona, the application they use to "verify" you, has a really gnarly privacy policy and it does seem completely intentional to just sell the shit out of your data.

My situation to avoid posting the same thing in multiple places: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43050578

To me it's really weird they're taking such elaborate measures to ban legitimate paying users when the site is completely infested with AI/bot spam anyway. They seem out of their depth. Oh, and as an extra screw you, they're still billing me, because of course they are.

Same happened to me, but by the time they gave me my account back (though now “unverified”, even though I had to scan my DL for them to unsuspend my account - and even though I was premium and verified before the suspension btw - though the hatred is still there, the rage-motivation to document the insanity had devolved into apathetic sadness (with much help of the general state of the current incarnation of the job market) so I’ve said nothing until this meager reply.

But specifically, what had occurred was that I noticed I had nearly fallen for an LLM-bot clone or takeover account from my contacts in my DM directing me to this “great recruiting firm” that looked to be just an identity docs siphoning scheme.

That caused me to notice a bunch of new 1st-degree connections I hadn’t added, all of which were profiles purporting to be Chinese AI researchers. No clue if they were real people and I didn’t spend time to investigate before doing exactly what you describe - change of password and enable 2FA, with the added step of trying to report the suspicious circumstances to the obvious security@ etc email addresses… ALL attempts of which bounced with messages telling me to use the LinkedIn platform to report security issues, as those email addresses are not monitored. (lol)

Of course, when I reluctantly tried to capitulate and report the matter using the links from the bounce messages, I found I could not, since my account was suddenly suspended for “suspicious activity”, and the kicker was that in order to unsuspend it, they wanted me to upload scans of my government ID! Yes, they wanted me to do the suspicious sort of activity I was wanting to report was happening on their platform in order to use the very platform I suspected someone had already pilfered my identity through. I waited a week or so, too disgusted and angry and ready to write them off until, well.. oh yeah, a job. my contacts. sigh

Of course, that’s also another example of the insecure patterns companies force on their users and employees while at the very same time giving them training to not do exactly those things, and exhibiting all the red flags they point out the employee needs to be aware of as indicators of phishing, etc.

I was with a company that outsourced their security policy training and compliance to a company that sent “URGENT” emails from phish looking custom domains incorporating our company’s name, and all the other red flags that told me not to do the things it asked. (so I didn’t, and instead reported each one to our internal security team. It was funny until it wasn’t.)

Hey… Nice. There’s that therapeutic rage-typing I never got around to, and this comment almost brings my comment back on topic. I feel a little better anyway. Thanks all!

honestly seeing someone else go through similar made me feel a lot better and not like I was under some bizarre cyberattack - I also encountered some weird behavior like that too, but being a part time security researcher, and long time user, didnt consider the platform would react to fairly benign use of the platform in such a severe manner. I have actual damages I can prove, live in a state where I’m fairly certain they’re violating privacy laws, and just seeing stuff like this confirms the issue is more widespread than just dumbass old me, who is completely harmless and definitely a real user that anyone of any competence over there should be able to figure out. I’m dealing with outsourced overseas support just giving me chatgpt scripts. Trying to figure out how to escalate further - I’d be interested in chatting with people like you on more info, because like you, I am also (rightfully) very mad. my side business has been generated mostly using my linkedin, which is why I’ve always paid for it.
I kept catching myself scrolling down their idiotic feed and wondering what the hell I was doing. Mindless dreck, all of it. Yet I still get cold inbound from it that turns into business, so I can't just abandon the platform entirely.

I wrote a ~50 LOC browser extension that always redirects away from the feed to your profile. Works great, sideload and forget.

https://github.com/classvsoftware/nofeeds

Nice. I use one in the chrome store called News Feed Eradicator. https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/news-feed-eradicato...
Looks nice, but that extension is a high-value acquisition target for bad actors, and there's nothing but an email for contact information.

Sideloading eliminates this risk completely.

Dev of the mentioned extension here, I've been getting emails from bad actors offering to "buy" the extension for years. It really has made me far less trusting of browser extensions.

If I can be bothered replying, I tell them it's open source, they can just use the code for free. Eventually if I push them on it, they tell me they just want to acquire the users, and don't care about the extension. I wonder just how many extensions are compromised this way, it's a mess.

Every experienced LinkedIn user knows that you're not supposed to actually use LinkedIn.
SuckedIn or ChainedIn would be more appropriate as a name.
I don't use it much and I haven't had your issues but I'm sick of the political and stupid, irrelevant content. It was supposed to be about professional networking and finding work. It's turning into Facebook and not the original Facebook,the horrible bloated mess it's become.
Enshittification touched everything
This post feels like it should be on linkedin. Have we reached the point of LinkedIn-ify'ing HN?
> made me take a photo of myself and of my passport

I'm not sure how this has become the go-to method for every site that needs person verification, and it's kinda terrifying because you just know they keep all of it stored somewhere forever with half assed security and the whole DB will get leaked sooner or later like it always is, leading to so much identity theft it's not even funny. The only camera that should ever get to see anyone's passport is the border police scanner.

And I'm sure they say they delete all of it after verification, and then probably laugh about it afterwards if anyone believes that bullshit.

I've worked on some of this stuff. It was mandated by Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti Money Laundering (AML) regulation on the finance industry, who developed smoother UX patterns and white-label vendors for doing such a thing, which helped normalize and simplify the process for other data-greedy sectors to adopt. Yes, marketing tried to pretty-please their way into data that should only have been for verification. To my knowledge they didn't succeed. On that attempt. At that company.

That most financial regulations targeting bad actors end up constraining or disempowering regular people is a feature, not a bug. This is a really good thread: There is no freedom without the freedom to transact.

https://nitter.net/punk6529/status/1494444624630403083#m

Sort of reminds me of hollywood. They used their power to push music/movie drm. This then was pushed into the computer industry (to play media), and then phones and tables became locked up/normalized (to play media), and then the locks have made all this other (disempowering regular people) stuff possible.
From your description, you created from another country? Perhaps non-western?

I am not familiar with their internals but am assuming they deal with spam/scams and you are an unfortunate casualty.

No i disagree X.com is the worst, was the other guy on this sub and I think you are correct on the whole point is the people that have a right and the people that do have the ability and ability are not necessarily people that have a responsibility.
How is X worse?
LI has to be among the worst social media. The amount of constant self aggrandizing and obviously fabricated stories is insane(cue 'that homeless man was my boss!' memes).

That said, it's not completely valueless. I keep it around to see what old coworkers are up to these days(career wise). I've also gotten a job from a recruiter who found me there. I'm guessing one or both of those are the only reasons anyone keeps it around. The content is pretty bad.

cryingpicture.jpg

I'm in ER, my father has just died.

This is what it thought me about B2B sales.

Read more

Amazing great work!

EPolanski is one of the best b2b sales people in the universe!

#goodtogreat

— /s of course :)

If you found even a single job off of it, doesn’t that mean it’s great? This is its main purpose.

Perhaps it could be better, but a lot of people would pay a lot for a single good job offer. And you accepted it.

I found my dream (and current) job via a recruiter who messaged me on LI. I couldn't to this day tell you why I opened that one message where I ignored dozens of others, but yeah.

I will say though the social aspects in specific are completely value-free, IMHO. It's just business-Facebook. I've never read nor made a single post on LinkedIn, and can't envision a time I would, and every post I've seen elsewhere screenshotted seems fucking unhinged.

So like, these features: professional networking, private messaging, as an archive of your work history: sure. Those work and are good. Everything else where it tries desperately to be a social network nobody asked for: garbage. Bin it. Could probably cut the operating cost of the website by 96% if you did, too, with the added benefit of not needing to send me dozens of fucking emails begging for engagement.

It's absolutely the worst, the posts are pure cancer. But I've got like 5 of my 7 jobs over the past 15 years from LI. In conclusion, it is a land of contrasts.
This is the only reason people are on LunkedIn. It's terrible, but somehow successful for finding work.
Why don’t you unfollow people without removing the connection? It’s easy. I have zero fake story in my feed, only my IRL friends. I really don’t understand why people complain about that all the time. LinkedIn may suck, but they don’t push random people on your front page.
Post-Twitter, in my corner of the world, scholarly publishing technology, people have moved to BlueSky, Mastodon and LinkedIn.

I agree, LinkedIn is full of people performing their career as social media and posting selfies. But there is also useful information from orgs and people who moved off Twitter and shifted their weight to LinkedIn.

Twitter was a unifying platform (maybe that was just accumulated through time) and the shakeup has benefited LinkedIn.

The one upside is it generates so much amazing content for the r/LinkedinLunatics subreddit
But how will people possibly know how successful I am without it?!?
Genuinely curious what's a decent platform to keep in touch with companies and handle your career. Any tips?
all of them are the worst, dude.

you know, like that famous quote: some people are more equal than others.

or something like that anyway, I cannot be arsed to check for the exact one, because it's pathetic shit, not important.

iirc it is from either of these two books by George Orwell: animal farm or 1984.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Orwell

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Farm

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Farm

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four

> all of them are the worst, dude.

Most social media doesn’t tie directly to your work and profession. They all suck, but LinkedIn has a way uniquely painful way of hurting people.

Though there seems to be a steady stream of people who have a sick day then post photos on IG of what they were actually doing.

LinkedIn is full of worthless posts full of users wanking each other off. Its the only place full of "get out of bed early, quite drinking soy lattes, inherit wealth" type of posts where it doesn't get challenged (maybe X is another one).

I genuinely might prefer reading AI-generated crap, because then I feel better about humanity.