15 comments

[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 34.5 ms ] thread
Recommendations are well and good, but I can't see them having much if any impact on what people do. It would be better to ban the use of smart phones at schools (or at least in classrooms) entirely, pass laws to better protect people's privacy, and pass regulation to restrict the kinds of exploitative practices that are designed to drive up anxiety and addiction to these devices. Especially those that target children.
Not the first time Japan has done something like this[1] and I honestly welcome it. It's not a strict rule, gives people flexibility to at least talk about it and disagree with little consequence. Another severely online commenter mentions protecting peoples privacy and exploitative practices but we're wayyy beyond those types of conversations. Limiting online-ness in a gentle way that's not gonna piss off a bunch of people and get the feels for it seems to be a very Japanese thing to do.

https://english.kyodonews.net/articles/-/17744?phrase=Onaga%...

Why is there a city doing this?

Isn't it the job of a public health agency? Like, at a national or even international level?

Or of a scientific body?

What legitimacy has an administrative, and often political, structure, to make a non-binding health recommandation (thus, an advice), with a scope limited to the city, even though the matter has nothing to nor specific to this city?

It looks like a political stunt, not something initiated by health specialists.

Remember, in other countries, especially eastern ones, the recommendation of even your local city means allot. There is a deeper trust of government bodies so this will likely have an impact.

And starting small is probably good, lets the idea iterate before rolling it out wider and this often comes down to making a choice, this city just thought this would be best and I suspect unless this goes horribly wrong it will help

Just thinking about a mockable law may keep it in the collective consciousness for more people to independently choose to detox from their phone
In China, parents track their kids with ‘gps smart watches’. Oh yeah there is also a gamified social network for kids only, giving credit for the schools stationairy shop based on likes/popularity. What could go wrong? [0]

[0] https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1017357

So how will this work, are explosive ammunitions delivered to your device’s location if you exceed the day’s usage?
9pm for elementary school children? What are they doing up so late to begin with?
Smart phone use is banned while driving in australia.

Detectors and cameras are used to find and fine those who break the law.

We are discussing local news in a small town in Japan, thousands of miles away for most of us; and how social media is an attention-wasting time-sink for other people. We need to help those other people.
If you interested on this new, there was another ordinance in Kyoto city which restrict Kanpai(cheers) must be done with sake. If you kanpai'ed with anything other than sake in Kyoto city, you violate this law.

There is no punishment for breaking these ordinances.

I don't live too far from here (Osaka), Toyoake is not a small city and is pretty close to Nagoya, it is interesting to see somewhere not completely remote try something like this.
I don’t know how Japanese city ordinances work.

What I would like from these things is to be able to opt-in to a recommendation. Just a two-minute way to opt-in. They can do the work and we all can have the least possible hassle trying it out.[1]

[1] I’m not up to date on the state of the art of limiting your own smartphone time

> though there will be no penalties proposed.

As usual this is Japanese politicians being completely clueless and pretending to do something.