Having both worked at Amazon and still in the cloud industry, to me this seems like a strange take.
Apple leases these computers from Amazon like it would from any other colo. Why wouldn’t these servers be considered Apple servers?
Barring a major privacy violation by AWS (which doesn’t seem likely), or some other sort of 0-day hack the data on these servers is entirely private to Apple.
> This appears inconsistent with Apple’s privacy statement that such system data “never leaves Apple servers or goes to third parties.”
As I recall, this statement was specifically about Apple Intelligence. It was for their AI that couldn’t be done on-device, and wasn’t going to ChatGPT after user authorization.
It was not a general statement that all Apple endpoints are in-house.
Looks like a nothing burger from someone with an incredible GitHub profile of reporting monumental security flaws to Apple and not being credited or receiving bounties.
12 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 33.6 ms ] threadhttps://www.cnbc.com/2024/12/03/apple-says-it-uses-amazons-c...
Apple leases these computers from Amazon like it would from any other colo. Why wouldn’t these servers be considered Apple servers?
Barring a major privacy violation by AWS (which doesn’t seem likely), or some other sort of 0-day hack the data on these servers is entirely private to Apple.
PRISM
As I recall, this statement was specifically about Apple Intelligence. It was for their AI that couldn’t be done on-device, and wasn’t going to ChatGPT after user authorization.
It was not a general statement that all Apple endpoints are in-house.
That sounds like it is distributing configuration data from Apple to user's systems. Is there any per-user private data in that?