His name appears on what appears to be Epstein's daily schedule, with the entry reading: "Reminder: Elon Musk to island Dec.6 (is this still happening?)"
>They show Musk as a potential visitor to Epstein's island, Little St James, on 6 December 2014 - six years after Epstein became a listed sex offender.
even Trump had supposedly broken contact with him long before then..
edit: considering Theil is also in there too. I wonder do they want to avoid revealing where Epstein's money went after he died?
Am I the only person who thought they would have burned everything in a dumpster by now, and degaussed every hard drive and just denied that Epstein even existed? Given how much effort they were putting into prevaricating, claiming it was all a Democrat hoax, that no such files existed, or that Epstein never did anything wrong? Wasn't Ghislane moved to Texas to shut her up?
That there are actually still files to release is baffling. I assume the release was judiciously selective and that none of the files will implicate Trump, and all of them will implicate Democrats and people he doesn't like.
Considering one of Musk's pressing priorities with grok was waifu girls, and the weird 'pedo guy' accusation (projection?), I wouldn't be in the least bit surprised if there was more to this story.
1. This is a national security matter. Epstein's business, such as it was, wasn't pimping the underage to rich men, it was blackmailing for his own account and selling blackmail material to anyone willing to pay him enough. That means state actors. And that means we can't trust anyone who was in Epstein's circle with national security work.
2. It wasn't just underage females. Gay men can be blackmailed, too.
I believe it very likely that some extremely well known people are in there, and whom politicians are desperate to defend, if not themselves.
The problem is that Epstein loved to hang around celebrities who presumably had no interest in his crimes, or who were only connected by financial matters.
There is a map of his known contacts. No implication. "We mapped Jeffrey Epstein's social network. Here's what we found." [0]
12 comments
[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 36.4 ms ] threadeven Trump had supposedly broken contact with him long before then..
edit: considering Theil is also in there too. I wonder do they want to avoid revealing where Epstein's money went after he died?
That there are actually still files to release is baffling. I assume the release was judiciously selective and that none of the files will implicate Trump, and all of them will implicate Democrats and people he doesn't like.
It's a nothing burger. Musk already said he was invited and declined, which matches what they found.
Even Trump admits he was friends with Epstein. If they actually had evidence of wrong doing, it would have been released a decade ago to the press.
Friends != guilty of anything. Democrats have been friends with evil dictators over the years and it's never mentioned again.
If you have proof, let's see it.
1. This is a national security matter. Epstein's business, such as it was, wasn't pimping the underage to rich men, it was blackmailing for his own account and selling blackmail material to anyone willing to pay him enough. That means state actors. And that means we can't trust anyone who was in Epstein's circle with national security work.
2. It wasn't just underage females. Gay men can be blackmailed, too.
The problem is that Epstein loved to hang around celebrities who presumably had no interest in his crimes, or who were only connected by financial matters.
There is a map of his known contacts. No implication. "We mapped Jeffrey Epstein's social network. Here's what we found." [0]
It is part of this article. [1]
[0] https://cdn.america2.news/2025/07/epstein-1.png
[1] https://america2.news/we-mapped-jeffrey-epsteins-social-netw...
difficulty: impossible