32 comments

[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 48.6 ms ] thread
(comment deleted)
This is really cool and innovative thinking, but anything aerodynamic does not scale linearly. It's really easy to make something light fall slowly. Baby spiders use "ballooning" -- a single thread -- to fall so slowly that they can travel far in thermal updrafts.

What's missing here is any evidence that the same cool parachutes will work on anything of significant mass, e.g. a parcel weighing 2kg or an average human weighing 80kg.

Related work that his lab was doing when I got to take a seminar with him at IU: https://gwern.net/doc/design/typography/1993-mcgraw.pdf

Gary was one of the TAs in the class. The non-reducibility of letterforms has remained a fascination—I always did like the (computational) linguistics corner of cognitive science!

Regretting my choice to do a PhD in CS instead of whatever this cool thing is…
Modern parachutes can be packed relatively small and open quite quickly. Not sure how you would pack one of these parachutes, especially if they are made from a relatively stiff plastic.
> When dropping a payload from a drone or aircraft, this gliding angle means parachutes will often drift far from their intended targets. This can be especially frustrating and potentially dangerous for operations such as humanitarian aid delivery, where precisely targeted airdrops are often vital to success.

I could't help but roll my eyes at this textbook example of describing new technology as being "useful for humanitarian or search & rescue work", instead of the much more obvious usefulness in military applications.

Who's kidding who about what "precisely targeted airdrops" are most likely to be used for? These will be in use by Ukraine well before anything beyond a technology demo drops on to a "stranded hiker" in a National Park...

Both can be simultaneously true.

Dropping supplies to isolated or behind-the-lines forces is a very real logistical issue. While some of those supplies might be munitions, rations and medical supplies are a significant part of the need.

I know, it doesn't make you feel any friendlier to the issue, but tech has multiple applications. Chainsaws were invented to increase survivability of mothers in difficult births.

This looks perfect for bomblets. I imagine the Ukrainians are already stamping these out of plastic somewhere.
I hope the paper and cardboard construction they mention is feasible for commercial use. Otherwise I'm picturing a future where drone deliveries are commonplace and these plastic parachutes litter our streets and waterways.
Biopolymer or paper, hopefully.
Insane how much precision our modern world needs for people to be happy.
My grandma wouldn't have been happy if my father dumped the bucket from the well near the kitchen sink.

Nothing much has changed about precision in delivery of goods.

Cool. This looks like a huge ecological nightmare similar to six pack rings and shopping plastic bags.
I wonder if this would be suitable for drone delivery of small groceries, to keep the drone high enough that people don’t have to hear the noise.
How long before we see these attached to bombs dropped by drones? It would reduce time over target and likely increase accuracy.
I really like this kind of exploration that blends natural principles, aesthetics, and engineering. It is not just a technical breakthrough but a fresh way of thinking about what it means to land.

I can imagine how meaningful it would be if one day these kirigami parachutes are used to drop medical supplies, support disaster relief, or even serve space missions. Beautiful and practical at the same time.

Relief packages, cheaply dispersed over a multi-block area, would make it more difficult for invading forces to massacre civilians at drop sites.

I can think of one place that would have IMMEDIATE utility.

Reminds me of a shuttlecock.
I was reseaching kirigami yesterday for a DYI project, and it was the first time I heard about kirigami, and of course I stumbled upon the parachute application. And now its on the front page of HN?

To whoever is running the simulation: This is a bit on the nose. And don't even try to Baader-Meinhof me.

"drone delivery and humanitarian aid". Right. Thousands of military FPV drone operators beg to differ.
That's literally drone delivery.
Can one nest those kirigami structures on top of each other? Imagine if you had a smaller-diameter version right on top of it. It would open up inside the outer one, increasing the surface area. The bottle example didn't seem convincing in and of itself in the videos, but the small egg and LEGO figure had what looked like somewhat functional.
I wonder if it is easier/lighter to make a parachute that can handle different speeds, e.g. for atmospheric reentry, reusing the same structure for the drogue chute and the main chutes.
(not a very serious comment, feel free to skip)

This is a funny timing. I was just discussing with my son this morning what the most efficient ways were to set free the mice we catch in our mouse friendly trap. One of the "options" we came up with was a launching mechanism and a tiny parachute to send them to a field at the end of our street. The main problem we came up with was that it was really hard to predict where the mouse would land. I'll show him this kirigami design this afternoon :-)

(Disclaimer: obviously we're not actually launching mice. These are just thought experiments. I actually walk to the field to release the mice.)

Manufacturing cost is a major benefit of this kind of design. You could just stamp these out of paper en masse for pennies. Great for mass production.