95 comments

[ 1.6 ms ] story [ 74.7 ms ] thread
well, they'll be missed for sure.
Additionally, they're launching their first joint product, the $44 Uno Q SBC, which has a Dragonwing SoC and STM32 microcontroller on an Uno form factor board[1].

It seems like Arduino will keep their brand, maintain their existing product lines, and continue building devices using other vendor's chips (besides Qualcomm), etc... but as with all acquisitions—I wonder how long that state of affairs will last.

Alternatives like the Pi RP2040/2350 and Espressif's vast selection of boards can fill the gaps, but Arduino was what got me and many people I know into microcontrollers, so I have a special fondness for them!

[1] https://www.arduino.cc/product-uno-q

Do you happen to know how good the Linux environment is on the Dragonwing SoC.

I think their slides say Debian, but didn't mention what binary blobs one needs to have for enabling various functionality the SoC provides / how much their kernel deviates from mainline kernel ...

theyre going to push "AI on the edge" and "IoT" nonsense again

absolutely unbelievably cooked. anyone pushing that nonsense, short with leverage.

low latency connectivity + goliath data centres will always beat on-device inference/training.

I only feel dread when I see a Qualcomm story on HN anymore.
You can make a low volume product by buying a bunch of Arduinos as your controller. You just stick them in the device. There's no license issue. While I haven't exhaustively looked, one vendor's kit I did look at explicitly stated their boards were not licensed for that kind of commercial use. Qualcomm could very well make their boards for development, test, and evaluation purposes only. And that would be my worry. It wouldn't effect tinkering at home or use in a classroom, but would mean you couldn't buy a stack of Nanos, flash them, and plug them into your project, if it is for a commercial purpose.
I've not used an arduino for a number of years, I assume this means they are not going to use atmel/microchip anymore?
Espressif has been eating their lunch, the boards are way more capable and much cheaper. Why would anyone pick an Uno over an ESP32?
ESP stuff is so damn cheap and capable now I'm not sure what you would use Arduino for these days.
It's not the hardware but the ecosystem, libraries and support which is available. Sure there are alternatives like platformio but when you're learning most of the stuff out there eg youtube use Arduino IDE and libs. And just try and get an LLM to produce code based on Espressif libraries not Arduino lols...
Fucking hell.

Qualcomm is one of the worst vendors out there to deal with if you're a small hardware developer - let alone the kind of hobbyist who wants to use Arduino boards.

In a perfect world? Qualcomm would use Arduino to bring some of their chipsets and devices to public, and have the Arduino team open them up to small developers. Essentially doing what Pi Foundation is doing for Broadcom - package their unpalatable ICs into something that people actually use.

But we're not in a perfect world. We're in the kind of world where Qualcomm exists in the first place.

The pessimist in me fully expects Qualcomm to make Arduino worse rather than Arduino to make Qualcomm better.

Okay, IIRC the sum wasn't disclosed. I wonder what was the ask.
Interesting how Arduino is now planning to release a SBC, while Raspberry Pi also has a microcontroller lineup. Now using a RPi or an Arduino board in a project won't mean much when their products are nearly the same.
This is desperation and I think it will go nowhere good.

Arduino has neither technical (standards, form-factor, pinouts), nor mindshare among developers that can be useful for high-speed, modern and upcoming AI-on-the-edge applications.

It sounds like Qualcomm is making a belated move towards robotics, but acquiring these assets is only going to distract them from becoming a successful player.

call me cynical but I can't imagine this ending very well. Even if qualcomm does nothing to alter the operations at Arduino, what happens if they go belly-up in a decade?
With their goal of 50/50 handset/non-handset revenue split by 2030, and their recent acquisitions pointing in the same direction, it stands to reason that they will do a lot of high capex investments into things like chiplet/chiplet communication for datacenters, automation/automotive, as well as edge AI. We can also observe they're baking in a lot of fpga-style configurability into a lot of these product lines - the connectivity fabric they acquired along with alphawave semi, their hexagon dsp, nuvia(oryon which they won the legal case for recently), etc,. which is another hint for the type of market they're targeting.

My opinion is that they should productize ESP [1] (no, not that one) which will be super harmonious with their goals.

Arduino acquisition, IMO, is putting one foot into manufacturing automation/automotive/sensors field. They have done similar in the past, arriver was an ADAS compute thing.

Personally I don't believe they will take the execution risk and scale up on all of these things. They will probably wait for the right time and chop off a few of these things and focus on whatever looks like it's going to be a cash cow.

Finance wise, there will be near term margin pressure but long term (IMO) they will execute superbly on a portion of their bets.

The main problem is the clock is ticking, handsets becoming commodified leading to vertical integration, licensing losing value, etc. Apple modem agreement running out soon too, and 6G modems too will not be as high margin due to diminishing improvements in telecom tech, even operator uptake at this point is looking unlikely after the 5G... debacle.

Which explains the very diverse bets they have made.

Will be interesting to see what they execute in this limited timeframe.

[1] https://www.esp.cs.columbia.edu/

I hope they don't enshittify Arduino. Please keep it open hardware and open source.
I heard the rumor quite some months ago but it was mostly speculation, altough it made sense after they acquired Edge Impulse.

I'm not sure whether to be happy or not to be fair. Main issues with Arduino while I was there was the leadership lack of vision and the unwillingness to support projects coming from the engineers. It was a company kinda coasting and unsure where to go.

If they replace leadership with people that have an clear vision and focus this might be good.

My greatest hope is that people with stocks don't get screwed over though, they used to distribute them quite "easily" at a certain point to avoid raising salaries.

This is a recipe for disaster. Arduino is great for education/tinkering. Qualcomm won't sell you anything even if you are ready to commit to buying 1000s. I tried to source some Qualcomm chips for a startup @ 10k qty and was told there would be no information or support. Qualcomm can have a much bigger market if they simply open up some product lines for distribution like MediaTek do.

China has a way more vibrant, innovative hardware industry simply because you can source everything made by Chinese firms.

My first instinct to this piece of news is a five-char word starting with 'S'.

But reading through the news, it seems to be fine?

> Arduino will preserve its open approach and community spirit while unlocking a full‑stack platform for modern development—with Arduino UNO Q as the first step.

> The new Arduino UNO Q is a next-generation single board computer featuring a “dual brain” architecture—a Linux Debian-capable microprocessor and a real-time microcontroller—to bridge high-performance computing with real-time control.

Looks like they want to use the brand to push out their own stuffs, which seems to be reasonable. As long as they don't touch the education/OSS part I guess it will benefit both.

Just wait for a few years and then you can forget everything about open or open source about Arduino. And maybe in 2030, you will only be able to run the Arduino IDE on Windows with a specific driver to ensure that you only flash a firmware to a DRM controlled authentic Arduino device.

It is a nightmare when such an acquisition happen.

Hope good things come out of it.

My favorite thing from Arduino was the UNO R3, highly versatile for "hardware" stuff at way back then.

I heard Espressif / ESP32 was its spiritual "successor".

This does not bring joy
Can someone explain why Arsuino is attractive to Qualcomm? I mean is it a gateway drug to Qualcomm chips?
To anyone at Arduino/Qualcomm reading --

If you're looking to make Uno Q SBC a gateway to more companies building on Qualcomm SoCs, please also release:

- Affordable HQ camera modules, with drivers, tuned ISP support for the board

- Low volume SoC purchases on Mouser/Digikey so we can move from evaluation board to prototypes

- Reference schematics

- High quality documentation and maintained Yocto layers for embedded linux development

- Ability to use SoC features like AI acceleration / ISP without huge headaches