9 comments

[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 26.9 ms ] thread
It increases the rate of production of neutral antihydrogen from antiprotons and positrons by a factor of 8. It doesn't increase the efficiency of production of antiprotons, which is the extremely inefficient, energy intensive part.
They cut production time to a given number of anti-atoms from 10 weeks to 7 hours by improving the electron cooling, just from this fact it is a bit rich to insist the anti-proton generation is the limiting factor.

Going to the paper itself we can observe that the CERN Antiproton Decelerator can deliver 10^7 antiprotons every 2 minutes. Remembering it previously took 10 weeks to capture 10^4 anti-atoms, I hope you forgive me for not agreeing that the antiproton generation is the source of important inefficiencies.

In simple terms for humanists, does that brings us closer in anyway to scifi engines?:)
What are the civilian applications?
Slow annihilating weapons that boil water that goes trough turbines.
And what do we do with it? This isn't star trek, I can't just go shove this into my warp drive and blast off... /shrug
Now we can make a firecracker's worth of antimatter (by annihilation energy) in a mere two hundred thousand years of continuous production. Super cool stuff though, pun intended.
I just finished Angels and Demons ffs