79 comments

[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 79.9 ms ] thread
And of course, the best behavior will be the behavior that poses zero threat to the people in power. What a great future we have ahead of us, my colleagues.
Fear works only if delivered occasionally in byte sized quantities, too much of it and people not only stop fearing, they will also likely be indifferent to it, worse case even out right rebel.

If you had a weapon which is powerful, you better use it sparingly. Fear of the weapon is more important than the weapon itself.

I’m reminded of the several stories these past months about social media comments and police and incarceration. Attack on the First Amendment.

Public surveillance is an attack on the Fourth Amendment.

I'm 100% sure a man like him, with lots of money, will have "interesting" life. The fact that he's willing to be recorded, is he an exhibitionist?

Oh wait, he's exempted?

> Ellison's warning came during an hour-long Q&A at an Oracle financial analyst meeting in September 2024.

AI has been moving too fast to care about what some billionaire's opinion on it was 2 years ago.

Look how well it worked for cops! I'm not suggesting we get rid of their bodycams, but it's easily gamed.

It's one thing to be rich and enjoy the luxuries afforded by that, but to buy dominance over the very lives of others is when the angry mob retaliation is entirely justifiable.

If anyone managed to stick around through the later, lesser seasons of HBO’s Westworld, they were rewarded with a shockingly plausible view of the world Ellison is describing.

And at a time when most of the computing technology required still seemed like sci-fi. I remember kind of chuckling at the idea that the machine intelligence had made and saved a recording of a random conversation Aaron Paul’s character had with his mother in a diner a decade prior.

I have never been a privacy zealot, but it seems inevitable barring major political action that the panopticon will emerge comprehensive, actionable, and cheap.

What really gets to me is how big tech isn't even pretending anymore to serve society. They clearly feel superior to the rest of us and entitled to rule.
Larry should be a good example and publicize all his communication.

Pretty sure he is on his best behavior all the time.

In other words, "We're evil so you can't be".
Is Larry confessing that he's not in his best behavior whenever he's not being recorded?
I think when we look back in 10-20 years, mass nearly universal surveillance will be seen as one of the largest social impacts of AI, or perhaps the largest.

We have barely scratched the surface, and I don't think most people have thought it through.

I guess I appreciate Ellison is educating people about what's going on...

"best behaviour" doing a lot of work here. Best as defined by the oppressor of course.
(comment deleted)
To be charitable to Ellison, it worked well in China.
And in Russia
(comment deleted)
Sounds pretty bad, but what’s the context? We should be skeptical of a quote out of context with some dogpile parallels without any other context. When did he say it? Where did he say it?
He forgot to mention we'll need 1000 more data centers and 3000 new prisons to manage the chaos. So confused by this billionaire behavior with wanting to control society.
uh... in a very literal sense upvoting this helps Ellison. I think
Sometimes I wonder, if we were actually allowed to engage in the consensual drugs and sex that constitutes 95% of the activity people want to "get away with", would our societal response to infringements on our privacy be even weaker than it currently is?