But if Apple is as innovative as they say they are, why don't they implement better serial numbers like the article suggests? I agree, the numbers can be hard to read, especially given their tiny size.
You can be great at some things, and suck at others.
Just because they screwed this one doesn't mean they're not (or can't be) innovative at other things. And just because they claim they're the most innovative company in the world does not mean that they are.
It's not presented as "newsworthy", so why ask that question? It's a mild musing on a subtle design defect in Apple products, which is interesting for a company that prides itself on getting little details right. It's also interesting from a wider perspective, because the problem of making alphanumeric strings that can be entered by hand is pretty common, and there are some easy steps you can take to make the process easier that few people actually take.
I have no problem with people posing idle thoughts on their blog. But this is Hacker News ... and this was not news, nor was it particularly interesting.
Since they can't change the existing serial numbers, why don't they have autocomplete software suggest the possible alternatives to an incorrect one based on the likely character mistakes?
17 comments
[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 51.3 ms ] threadJust because they screwed this one doesn't mean they're not (or can't be) innovative at other things. And just because they claim they're the most innovative company in the world does not mean that they are.
It's a serial number, and an employee made a mistake. End of story.
> About This Mac > More Info > Highlight serial > Copy (command + c or edit > copy> > Paste (command + v or edit > paste> into form field