47 comments

[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 38.3 ms ] thread
...in mice.

> Therefore, this study examined the effects of late middle-aged (18-month-old) male and female C57BL6/J mice receiving two intranasal doses of hiPSC-NSC-EVs on neuroinflammaging in the hippocampus at 20.5 months of age.

https://isevjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jev...

That PR piece was brutal to navigate. Undoubtedly punched up by AI, it took far too long to even understand what the treatment entailed.
The link to the actual paper was appreciated. The context of whether findings will generalize outside of mouse models can depend a lot on specifics of the problem.
That's exactly what I want: immortal mice!
That's a surprisingly underused plot for a sci Fi horror film.

Considering the grand total of experiments we've ran on the little guys, I'm kinda surprised we haven't bred Mousezilla yet

See also: “Flowers for Algernon”
You joke, but rodents make great pets, because they are very social and have a range of personalities, but most only live a few years. I knew someone with a pet retired lab rat, and it lived much longer than the average fancy rat, but even then, it didn't even live half as long as the average cat or dog.

If we could breed or treat rodents to live longer, we could keep low-resource pets without as much loss.

High impact journal for an interesting study that is admittedly largely out of my area of expertise. The limitation of it being done in animal models, is of course, noted, but also expected. The question I would ask is how well the underlying background research makes this outcome expected.
Damn, that’s one hell of a way to say “is this any good though?”. Too many words for such a simple question.
But "how well the underlying background research makes this outcome expected" does not mean "is this any good though".

It's also an actually interesting question.

It's one thing to find some things hard to follow, it's another to be proud of it.

Flowers for Algernon’s Brain
This short story was scarier to me as a kid than anything else I read at the time.
"Reverse brain aging", sure, in the same sense that taking Vitamin C reverses aging.

The nasal spray reduced markers of inflammation in hippocampal microglial cells.

A lot of things reduce inflammation. That is not "reversing ageing".

Of course, "reduces inflammation" doesn't headline very well...

The article is also heavily ai generated, I call bs on every single bit
This entire thread reads like I got flamed by LLM bots
Tell that to Bryan Johnson.
Sure let’s listen to someone with extreme anxiety about the most utterly democratic humane experience
Not all "utterly democratic humane experiences" are desired, so why not.
Why not have crippling anxiety? It shortens your lifespan for one.
This is the current big grift in anti-aging science:

1 - Find a marker correlated with aging across a large sample

2 - Find a medication or supplement that also alters that marker

3 - Do some before and after measurements of the marker with the supplement or medication, and claim that you have reversed aging. Rely on the fact that enough readers won’t look closely enough to wonder if the marker is a true independent variable that represents aging.

There is a pop theory that aging is just scurvy in slow motion and Vitamin C hypersupplementation actually goes a long way in staving it off.
Asking this honestly...if certain kinds of inflammation tend to accelerate aging, and those inflammations can be controlled or decreased, does that, in effect, at least slow (if not actually reverse) aging? Granted that the headline is sensationalized, it seems like there may still be a point being made that is valid.
I take N-acetylcysteine and it helps with brain fog also! Plus it reduces stress and irritability.
And OCD symptoms, and many also benefit from better impulse control. Its more effective than SSRIs for some.

NAC is one of the only known treatments for trichotillomania, a under discussed but common condition that causes people to uncontrollably pull their hair out.

NAC has also been studied to reduce nicotine and alchohol cravings as well.

Are there any risks associated with NAC supplementation? For example, could long-term usage reduce aptosis and thereby increase risks of developing cancer?
Some mixed cancer associations in animal models
What is your dosage?
I take 1200mg a day, when Im taking it. I think standard/reccomended dosage is 600mg.
What's the reason to take it everyday? Does it truly make a difference everyday or could you get away with 1/3 days?

What are the effects on you?

Late response, but I have OCD and trichotillomania. I take a higher dose because the studies that measure effectiveness for these disorders used this dosage. I do not notice any effects outside of less compulsion to mess with my hair, which us huge (for me).
Ugh, I thought we were done with the Boomers....looks like they're gonna hang on.
How soon until biohackers try this on themselves?
The failure scenarios are fun to imagine, like uncontrollable brain growth or waking nightmares as weird side effect of centuries-old brain.
Many Brain-aging study sample pools are from young folks that died in accidents, aged homeless alcoholics, and individuals that were in declining health.

Most cultures find it taboo to donate their beloved family members bodies for scientific dissection. Thus, people get ingrained "[bigotry] with extra steps" similar to phrenology proponents.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson%27s_paradox

"Old age and treachery will always beat youth and exuberance" =3

(comment deleted)
Temu science at Tamu.

I have an AI generated bridge that I can sell you...