29 comments of 165

[ 2.2 ms ] story [ 43.7 ms ] thread
(comment deleted)
That's great. Started using Base UI early on via 9ui [0] and found the primitives very pleasant to work with, especially if one wants to compose more complex components from other Base UI components. Maybe Shad can reduce some of the dependencies they rely on now.

[0] https://www.9ui.dev

Moving away from codemods and towards LLMs doing migration work is an interesting development.

Even if they’re more deterministic, I wonder if the days of codemods are numbered.

For boring applications - do people prefer the copy paste approach of shadcn instead of a traditional ui library like mantine?

The copy paste approach may be easily modifiable but creates new problems - ie now there is an upgrade ai agent for something that should just be ticking up a version number.

Tangential but does anyone an have opinion on Base UI vs React Aria?

Trying to decide between the two atm.

What is the shadcn/ui equivalent for Angular?

PrimeNG had a licensing change recently and I'm looking at a suitable alternatives for a fresh project.

Why? What advantage does it bring?
Most of the websites I found are still on the radix version.
Curious if anyone tried Astryx that was open sourced by Meta last week to see how it compares.
It’s getting tiring to hear at this point, but the Claude voice comes through clearly in this post, and it’s a little off-putting. If even an important product release doesn’t warrant full human attention, where will we draw the line?
(comment deleted)
Shadcn is great until you want to use it
I miss a good old skeuomorphic styleguide. I guess the last one was Blueprint?
Imagine building a brand new component library to replace your already quite successful component library and still making it React-only.
This reads like a script to a Theo video
I'm still on Daisyui and feeling FOMO here. Is it worth the switch and why?