22 comments

[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 36.2 ms ] thread
tl;dr

add tk when you hit a wall (abbreviated from 'to come', yet spelled with k as tc appears in many words)

I slice my latke with a pocketknife.
I found the low frequency surprising as it's so easy to pronounce--I suppose tc is used in most cases. Here's what I found for bigram freqs near TK:

Ratios (count / total) and percentages:

    PG: 0.00047%
    TK: 0.00046%
    KK: 0.00045%
    HQ: 0.00042%
    FN: 0.00042%
Every other one here I'd expect to see: Postgres, kk/okay (and my initials), headquarters, function. Of course there's Tcl/Tk but not used nearly as much as it could.
True, but have you ever sliced your LATKE with a POCKETKNIFE?
...I did, a few years ago, when I went camping with some friends.
I've a very dim memory of having heard about it years ago (more than a decades), from an article of Cory Doctorow, and in my mind, he was the one who came up with the idea (and chose the letters TK).

But I can be wrong (maybe it's not from Doctorow, maybe the article did not even claim the paternity of coming up with TK but it was me badly understanding it, ...)

I do this a lot but I use “TK:” with the colon to make it unambiguously grep-able (stands out better visually too)
GCP employees heart rate spiking at the title.
Could you instead use any two numerical digits? Then you've got a tagging system with up to 100 tags.

This assumes you're writing according to guidelines that insist you spell out all numbers. i.e. 58 is always intentionally "fifty-eight", so "58" must be your own meta text.

I think you can use whatever you want. The point is just to drop a quick marker that you can find later, and not interrupt your flow.
Ah, never mind. A slight refinement needed here.

AP style only spells out one through nine. 10 and above are written as numerals. So, you'd get 10 tags, not 100.

I think the regex would be: /(?<!\d)\d{1}(?!\d)/

[delayed]
No. I was thinking of AP style [1], but I was mistaken. Anyway, it's not like these guidelines are at the level of consistency you're probably expecting. I will merely take inspiration and strictly spell single-digit numbers "zero" through "nine". The "real" style guidelines have absurd exceptions that are completely irrelevant to me.

My parent comment wasn't an entirely unreasonable idea though [2]. There's generally a less than one percent chance of a high value two-digit number occurring. Three digits and above are even less likely.

[1]: https://apstylebook.com/ask_the_editors/style_guidance

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benford%27s_law#Generalization...

LLMs should use "TK" or stable diffusion (and the like) so as not to get hung up on sequential words/thoughts and fill them in later.
I think this is a great idea.
I just used to use: ????

It server the same purpose, placeholder for a word I couldn't think of, and wouldn't naturely appear in the text. Plus for me I could hammer out the four characters in frustration too, for not being able to think of the word/term I wanted.