Someone linked to the paper but basically it was pointing out a number was a multiple of X venus years and also Y solar years, but also it was a sum of different multiples of important astronomical values as well.
Oooh Cool. Math Bragging by "White Chested Fox" (Sak Tahn Waax), ca 800AD:
The formula shows how one 2,920-day cycle could be divided up into the calendar units used by the Maya people. This 2,920-day cycle was important because it tied together key astronomical cycles, corresponding to both five Venus cycles (584 days each) and eight solar years (365 days each). However, the Text 19 calculations also relate the 2,920 days to Uinal (months with 20 days), Tzolkin (the 260-day sacred calendar), Tun (a year with 360 days) and Mars years of 780 days.
The abstract, mechanized, non-serious, character of complaints about 'colonialism' in general is demonstrated very clearly here ... when with junior high knowledge you would know the Maya ascendency ended centuries before the Spanish accidentally infected the Americas with small pox.
The mathematician in question was active during the Arab conquests. Spain was under colonial Muslim rule. The Maya states were exterminating recalcitrant villages, man woman and child, over and over.
While overly confident, your response is not factually correct. Are you familiar with Francisco de Montejo, a Spanish conquistador who burnt innumerable Mayan historical documents etc?
I still can't reconcile how they didn't use the wheel for transportation. The explanations of lack of draft animals and unsuitable terrain aren't great. Not even a wheelbarrow?
I wonder how intelligible classical Maya is with modern Maya languages/points on the Maya continuum. For instance, does the classical word for fox share any resemblance to any Maya word for it today?
I can imagine it going either way really but would probably guess there was vastly more drift in the case of Maya. I would naively guess that the printing press would have a dampening effect on language drift, and that the kind of repression of both the language and culture under colonialism would encourage it.
13 comments
[ 1.8 ms ] story [ 29.3 ms ] threadhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/id...
(PDF button not working for me, but looks like entire contents are here in HTML).
The mathematician in question was active during the Arab conquests. Spain was under colonial Muslim rule. The Maya states were exterminating recalcitrant villages, man woman and child, over and over.
Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_de_Montejo
I can imagine it going either way really but would probably guess there was vastly more drift in the case of Maya. I would naively guess that the printing press would have a dampening effect on language drift, and that the kind of repression of both the language and culture under colonialism would encourage it.