11 comments

[ 11.1 ms ] story [ 103 ms ] thread
Does this apply to anyone who verified their ID to get access to the slightly less restricted Codex versions, or only to security professionals who have the almost-entirely unrestricted version?
(comment deleted)
I hope that at some point this is not developing to remote attestation when only "permitted" devices can use the models.
It’s an advertisement by Yubikey - the hardware key manufacturer
Cobranded YubiKeys? Weird flex but ok.

Seriously though if you are letting agents do whatever they want without a PR process that requires hardware authentication or proof of presence, you are putting your code and your org at high risk.

I was actually thinking they would have to do this. Having to mail a physical token to a valid address is a extremely powerful access control method.
Dumb question: is using the built in passkey support on my iPhone not considered “hardware-backed”, even though iPhone is using device biometrics?
It's a great deal — about 50% off — for those who already wanted a Yubikey.

https://www.yubico.com/store/partner/openai/

Interestingly, I had to switch to my unpaid OpenAI account to access it. I suspect this is because my paid account is registered to a custom.com email address.

I was looking at something similar a couple of days ago. I think a physical key like a yubi key is a great way to fight bot traffic. And apparently cloudflare already ran project to test this out, and found some small drawbacks. So they proposed CAP together with other orgs https://developers.cloudflare.com/fundamentals/reference/cry...

This might be an extreme case of that, but I can see us going in that direction