109 comments

[ 5.4 ms ] story [ 76.8 ms ] thread
How fun! Once, after climbing around in a dusty old church attic like this, I had to head straight to the airport for a flight. Barely made it on because something in the dust kept flagging as dangerous. They were using a test strip on my backpack and clothing and analyzing it in some kind of machine. Stressful as I was already pressed for time! Finally got a clean test and they let me through.
Is the solution to a positive swab really to keep swabbing until negative?
If this was in the US, it's all security theater. Basically if you get flagged, they swab everything in your bag to find what's getting flagged, and if it's legitimate they pass you through, or they keep swabbing you if its just your hands/arms because they also inspect your bag. It's kind of dumb, but also kind of makes sense.

For extra fun times, baby wipes / wet wipes get flagged as explosives in the US when they use the sniffer devices.

I will be the first to join you on "most of TSA is security theater"; the baby wipes are glycerine getting flagged by ion mobility spectrometry. The machines are fast because they just look for basic chemical building blocks, not doing full spectrometry to figure out the whole compound. So glycerin, nitrates, etc. set it off (and someone else's sticky glycerin e.g. sunscreen can gunk up the machine for multiple subsequent people).
Those guys must have a lot of fun with vapes. The liquid is 50-70% glycerine, and you get the stuff everywhere.
The system is also likely designed to have false positives so they can validate that the security people are doing their job. This is more obvious on the x-ray machines but resembles the "can you spot the phishing email" emails that often get sent out in corporate environments to detect people who need additional security education.
Ion mobility spectrometry is the tech that powers these, and they're VERY sensitive and VERY prone to false positives because it's just looking for ion signatures ("I smell a nitrate/glycerin/etc."). I'm not sure if they're changing modes on the machines between swabs or something, but the machine is a cue for more in-depth inspection, not "zomg I found a bomb". So, some repeated scanning to rule out a false positive or burn off gunk that's accumulated in the machine i.e. we just got a speck of something on the wand or something is gunking up the scanner as opposed to "someone covered in residue that is scary".
TIL! I appreciate the explanation, never considered them to be that sophisticated.
Also, it's not illegal to travel when covered in nitrate dust. Maybe you really were working with explosives or fertilizers earlier in the day. So it really should be just a flag to check that you don't still have the explosives with you.
Do you know if they also scan for drug residue using those devices? A while back I was travelling through a German airport, and got pulled aside to get the skin on my stomach and the inside of my bag swabbed, and I assume tested in the same kind of machine. I don't know what I did to warrant a further inspection, but I wasn't going to make a fuss. I sometimes wonder what would have happened if they'd pulled aside one of the guys in my group who were definitely using drugs
Or to assume it's a false positive.

Shortly after 9/11 I was flying out of Hawaii back to the mainland and I watched the screen when they swabbed my bag. It reported as positive for every single type of explosive (to the best of my knowledge, I was not carrying anything even remotely explosive). The tech looked at the results, said "that can't possibly be right" and waved me on.

In my experience if they test positive the tech will stop and wipe down the machine before trying again. They're highly prone to false positives.
Heathrow I'm guessing ?
In my experience, UK airports seem to not want you to leave the country — contra to the perception the government project regarding not wanting you to stay in the first place. :/

Had a number of experiences where their identity scanners (for some destinations they scan you at the start of security and just before the gate to ensure you get on the right aircraft) failed to be operational resulting in delays that ultimately may have forced me to miss my flight and stay in the UK. On the other hand, arriving from Ireland to the UK results in no checks because of the common travel area — you get waved through a special gate which is reserved for passengers from Ireland. LOL

This happened to me at SFO years ago after wearing a pair of jeans I had go-karted in earlier that day, but I ended up with almost a strip search.
These things are also notoriously prone to false negatives. I know a person who uses the same laptop briefcase to take their handgun to the local indoor shooting range, with magazines and ammo, and also uses that bag as a carry on for travel.

The bag goes right next to the shooting bench at the firing line. It presumably gets a decent amount of powder residue on it, and yet it's been swabbed several times and not set off anything. My buddy is scrupulously careful to remove anything non-airport-approved before taking it on a trip, so the fact that something "bad" was previously contained in the bag has been double/triple checked to be absent before they show up to the airport.

Heard similar stories from many people. I have my own--

I was at a range shooting this old revolver with worn seals. Every shot, unburnt (or sometimes burning) powder was flying backward onto my face and arms. I basically took a gunpowder shower.

Got up like 6 hours later and went to the airport to get on a plane. Got swabbed. Came back negative. Got on the plane.

So... yeah, not really sure what the swabs are doing. I have to assume it's more an issue of "they're not intending to detect that" than "failures to detect" because otherwise the repeated misses here are just a little too big to believe.

Most likely there is no quality control for the security process so no one has noticed that the swabs aren't working properly. Most such processes do not have any QA or QC as far as I can tell and the people actually doing the work have no interest in the effectiveness of the process or influence over it.
The swabs are looking for mercury as well as nitrates and things. A small bit of mercury can do a lot of damage to an airframe - nitrates too of course, but in larger quantities.

If you've been around mercury vapor, you'll set off alarms at the airport. Old church attics are often quite heavy metal.

Also, airports in places with free/open gun culture tend to have their weak spots, I'd imagine, when it comes to false positives ..

They don’t seem to be in contact with the people who actually fixed it.
> The "Status" LED flashes some kind of code - long long, short short short. I assumed the number of flashes would correspond to the time but apparently not. We didn't have time to figure this out before we had to leave.

long-long-short-short-short is 7 in morse code. They don't say what time they tried this or if it ever changed, though, so that's just a hypothesis.

It's almost certainly this. I suspect the advance button can be used to advance the time via morse code LED flashes and only then committed when you get to the right hour.

Perhaps the long-press commits the hour, which is why it rang once initially.

I used to use Morse to blink out status codes in similar things but I think by the mid-2000s I'd moved from PIC16F628s to atmega328.

I didn't build the chime box but it looks like the sort of thing I used to do back then.

As an engineer i would never think that complicated - morse code?

Couldn't it be just binary

long-long-short-short-short

11000

Which is - to everyones surprise - 24 as in hours.

To anyone other than a computer engineer, I would bet Morse code would be preferred at least 10 to 1. Most people who aren’t computer science majors could barely decode binary “10” correctly, whereas writing down the dots and dashes and googling “Morse code chart” is something I’d bet over 50% of non-engineers could do accurately.
How is this any different than decoding binary? If you can read a chart of codes involving either dot or dash surely you can also read a chart of codes with either 0 or 1.
I didn't know the Morse code digits before I saw the parent comment earlier today, but having looked them up, I have to admit that they are much easier to decode from a flashing light than binary and I'm pretty good doing binary in my head:

    ----- 0000
    .---- 0001
    ..--- 0010
    ...-- 0011
    ....- 0100
    ..... 0101
    -.... 0110
    --... 0111
    ---.. 1000
    ----. 1001
Also, if I see a light with short and long blinks and a pause in between, I'm going to immediately think Morse, not binary, and decoding it is almost intuitive.

FWIW, sometimes you hear of prisoners communicating by tapping out Morse code. I've never heard of anyone communicating by tapping out ASCII in binary.

It's not so much that it's different, it's just that Morse is the canonical dot-dash/beep-boop communication format in the UK, and binary is a niche distant second known only in the abstract as "it's all ones and zeros" to most non-tech people. So while an engineer would expect a beep-boop to be binary, a police station caretaker would expect it to be Morse, and I'd expect the people building that system to build it for the caretaker.
I had that thought too when I saw the parent comment appear, but then I looked up the Morse code digits and I have to admit that they are much easier to decode from a flashing light than binary and I'm pretty good doing binary in my head:

    ----- 0000
    .---- 0001
    ..--- 0010
    ...-- 0011
    ....- 0100
    ..... 0101
    -.... 0110
    --... 0111
    ---.. 1000
    ----. 1001
Also, if I see a light with short and long blinks and a pause in between, I'm going to immediately think Morse, not binary, and decoding it is almost intuitive.
The battery on that circuit looks very much like a backup battery we have connected to our house alarm.

We moved in to the house in 2003 and that battery died this year, so I would imagine that it is already or will very soon die. That said, if it's a backup battery and the electricity supply is stable then it may not make any difference.

Send it to Big Clive with a felt pen enclosed.
Genuinely underrated way to understand circuits. When I was younger and dumber I thought his practice was a bit silly, but man, it really is king.
For someone who is unfamiliar with that person/channel, what is that way to understand circuits?
Big Clive (a Youtuber from Scotland) often reverse-engineers circuits, resulting in him drawong the schematic in purple sign marker, often while commenting on the virtues (or lack thereof) of the design.

I was just starting to think "doesn't Big Clive visit Edinburgh periodically?" and then OP's suggestion scrolled into view. :)

Sounds like a great video idea for him, really.

Such a pleasant surprise to wake up and see my hometown at the top of hackernews!
This sounds like such a fun project, especially to share with like minded friends.
I dunno if setting the time counts as fixing...
sure it does. the mechanism was no longer functioning properly. and its a repair even moreso considering the unknown nature of the system.

sometimes you get paid because you know things, sometimes you get paid because you know how to figure things out.

Yeah I repair old cameras these days. The amount of cameras I've fixed by just poking at random stuff until it unjams is surprisingly high. Even more so the number I've "fixed" by just replacing the batteries.
I want friends like that!
What a lovely blog in general: some really fun retro-computing projects, written up in a very thoughtful, human way. Feels like a throwback to the earlier hacking spirit of the internet. Thank you, Colin: your "experiment with writing" is a success as far as I'm concerned!
i wish i could fix The Sun clock on Broadway and Chambers

it's literally kittycorner from City Hall, and hasn't been running for a while...

i'd do it for free if i knew who to even bother about getting up into it

Seeing the number of holes in that ceiling I really am concerned that the floor the clock is on is the same as the one with the holes, and I would advise that you secure the floor if you return to the attic.
The ceiling is fixed to the underside of the joists, the attic floor is fixed to the top side.
Thanks.
The other thing of course is that those beams are *massive*. They weren't dicking about when they built it. It wasn't built down to a price like things are today.
It being a municipal hall at first, I wouldn't be surprised the town wanted to spend a little extra, but at the same time, I imagine they needed to calculate the weight of the clock tower and over-engineered it in case the weight put too much strain on one end. Seeing that it's all stone on the outside. Were you referring to the white beams on the blue ceiling, or other beams? I'm guessing it's to support the weight of the machinery.
Article says it's a 1877 building. Maybe at the time they rely more on eyeballing with ample safety margins rather than precise calculation ?
There's a non-zero chance the "floor" is just plywood laid across some of the beams and the holes are from people missing the beam in areas there's no plywood
There's a Reddit user who posts in a car repair subreddit about his work repairing bell-tower equipment. Very cool.

https://www.reddit.com/user/dingdongbellguy/

Was just reading one of his posts earlier while having lunch, only a few miles from that very clock tower, the one in the post here. Other side of the capital!
This is what I want the internet to be. Great read.
I'm confused… You don't want to read about the newest LLM models on the HN front page all day long, every day of the week? SAD!!
If it helps at all, we put this article in the SCP (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26998308), which is why it's on the frontpage.

We didn't put it at #1 though! That is a confirmation that we made a good pick.

You could almost say like it was TIME something like this hit number 1 !

badoosh

....I'll see myself out

This made me giggle! Thanks.
> If it helps at all, we put this article in the SCP...

With the popularity of this post the "SCP" reference made me think Hacker News had some kind of antimemetics department.

Then I saw it was the Second Chance Pool and was sort of disappointed.

I've actually never connected the two before! The brain is so context-dependent...
Now now, you know full well there is no antimemetics division
I came here via unslop.news, so I have no idea what you're talking about.
I really wish I didn't have to read about AI in the comments of a post like this too, ugh.
I've embraced postmodernism and my latest hobby is using LLMs to connect ESP32s to random stuff in my house, so I can unironically WiFi-enable everything from my toaster oven to my 1950s 4-chime doorbell.
(comment deleted)
This is how it was about 15 years ago.
If you enjoyed this, here's Fred Dibnah exploring Big Ben and discussing some of the engineering details. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi1cqR1bJC4

Fred Dibnah was a treasure. If you enjoyed 5 minutes of Big Ben, here's an hour of his day job in heavy industrial steeplejacking - "The Ups and Downs of Chimneys" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KK2wF_-yoEg

I just got to tour Big Ben in July when I visited London. The mechanism is an amazing piece of technology and the precision achieved at the time of development was crazy. Also being able to stand next to the bell as it rang was truly an awesome experience.
One of many old clocks in Edinburgh that needs fixing. The one on the Balmoral Hotel had to get a lot of work done.

There were three identical street clocks in Edinburgh that the council there have tried to remove. They succeeded with the one at Tollcross.

I thought it was scheduled to come back. Just not in exactly he same place.

Is the Jawbone coming back?

No, the Jawbone still isn't there. There was talk of building a fibreglass version (probably the best option.) Animal rights people complained about it apparently.

Edinburgh Council has a habit of taking things into storage and not putting them back.

One pleasant exception: the Ross Fountain. That's back in Princes Street Gardens and is a) now working and b) looking better than it did back in the eighties and nineties.

"a circuit board which definitely was not from 1877" ;)
Obviously, the next logical step is a Home Assistant integration.
I love this. Any advice how to get involved in my local community in a similar way? I'd be so into doing some community project during my free time.
Depends on your local community, worth considering what spaces there are and just reaching out or showing up.
Where I live there is a local "optimist club" that does volunteer events every few weeks. Lions club does similar in some towns. Knight of Columbus also (I think they are Catholic church related though so might not be for you). Shriner club, and Masons also come to mind for some cities. Now that my kids are in school there are a ton of organizations that need adult help (marching band, sports...) and people are starting to learn what I can do - I wouldn't be surprised if someone calls me for help in something else.

Of course the above all depends on the exact situation in your area. Some of them are just a social club, and some are not. Some of them have religious affiliations that you may not like. Some of them are good in abstract but you hate the particular people in them.

I was heavily involved in the local maker space where I previously lived. The place seemed to attract these kinds of problems. Some people want to fix a VCR, others might want to fix a clock tower (who knows). Being involved there meant being around people who could really do anything, and the community seemed to know that.
Gorgeous building and a nice wee pub across from it! A couple of friends of mine used to stay not far from there.

I've half an idea I did some networky stuff for the Community Wardens probably around the time that chime box was fitted - if you see anything marked Alvarion or Ceragon, it's probably got my real name on it somewhere.

I'd love to poke about in there some time, maybe if I'm down in that part of the world I can jump in and volunteer to help too.

Does it work on a gear and pinion principle or an AC synchronous motor?
> Written on 11th April

> I had hoped we could do a "test" by letting the clock chime thirteen

What in the Orwell

Next time you're in Baltimore, be sure to visit the Bromo Seltzer Arts Tower where you can see its gravity-driven pendulum clock. It's a beautiful mechanism with a very specific claim: "The clockworks is the largest four dial gravity driven non-chiming clock in the world with the magnificent 24ft dials."

https://ibb.co/album/RNZZrJ

https://www.bromoseltzertower.com/about/virtual-tour

(The elevator motors are also up there so there's a lot going on.)