It doesn't even have to be transparent! (I think.) Big red "FIRE" letters and either a visible handle to open or very obvious instructions would probably be acceptable.
Flat minimal-contrast UI is one of those things that's nearly universally loathed by everyone except UI designers but that has bafflingly persisted in the marketplace for over a decade now. I'm sure there's a nice psychology-study article waiting to be written on the reason for this.
Compare with the equivalent in architecture, https://www.worksinprogress.news/p/do-people-prefer-traditio..., in particular the two photos halfway down where non-architects overwhelmingly preferred the reasonably-pleasant design in the first photo while architects preferred Cell Block D in the second.
They don't use fire extinguishers for lithium battery fires though (as the article mentioned: submerging it in special sand). It would possibly be a negative if a member of the public grabbed a visible extinguisher during a battery fire?
And I'm surprised that the reports seem to be from eight years ago, given the amount of old electronics that go through the stores
Usually luxury stores have sprinkler protection, availability of fire hose reels, etc.
In Australia this would not comply with our fire code. Putting it behind a cabinet is fine; but it must have visible signs that can be seen from 20m away with a 20/20 eyesight (assuming no obstruction etc).
This applies to all portable extinguishers; even if it’s additional ones you’ve added beyond what’s required. The idea and intent is simple: train people and first responders to locate portable fire extinguishers by the sign.
The "Steve Jobs" movie features a made-up subplot about Jobs insisting that the Fire Exit Safety signs be turned off to achieve "absolute blackout" in a theater. They very reasonably point out that no fire Marshall would approve it. I'm surprised for that reason, especially in midtown Manhattan. I've seen a fire marshall do a full inspection of a Broadway show and they were very thorough. This store is just a few blocks from there.
I think this is everything right about Apple. There is zero chance the building is not up to code, at least within the context of some exception granted to them by the city. Their extremely numerous number of employees are likely well trained on what to do during a fire, including where the extinguishers are. I can think of no stores I'd rather be in, if there's a fire, than that Apple Store. But, it makes nerds angry; they're more interested in the process than the outcomes.
I agree there’s zero chance of written documentation that the building isn’t up to code.
That’s very different to it actually complying with code however. And to your second example, if I was physically attending WWDC back when they did they keynotes, I’d much rather seeing illuminated exit signs than having them (illegally) turn them off in case of a fire.
Much of building codes is either outdated, no longer the most effective way to achieve something, etc. But these building codes are written in blood. It’s why we have them.
Do that all you want in your personal house, but public spaces and even private workplaces with employees other than yourself rightfully should adhere to standards that apply the same everywhere so that any person has a reasonable chance to succeed at the crucial task in an unplanned emergency.
"My emergency response plan is there will always be a trained employee." is exactly as stupid as "My emergency response plan is there will never be an emergency."
1. “Reportedly, an Apple retail or office installation has been circulating” - but they then include a tweet as their apparent source that explicitly says it’s the 5th Ave store. So why say it might be an Apple office instead?
2. Maybe they are so wishy-washy about it because they aren’t confident it’s real, but if that’s the case, then writing a lengthy article criticizing something you aren’t confident actually occurred…
3. “Reportedly, an Apple retail or office installation has been circulating” has a hyperlink across multiple words so you’d think it would be their source, but no it’s to the Apple homepage.
No turn signal stalks, instead rotating buttons on the steering wheel. No PRND stalks either. Critical controls hidden on touchscreen behind look-then-swipe nonsense.
Also funny is the same nonsense apple has done between mouse scroll wheel movement direction and "natural" touchpad direction. Tesla's old PRND stalk was down for forward, up for reverse. New cars have touchscreen only gear select, and it is UP for forward, DOWN for reverse.
28 comments
[ 2.1 ms ] story [ 82.1 ms ] threadSo, let’s not blame Apple here. Let’s blame the mall for doing something really stupid.
https://www.nngroup.com/articles/flat-design/
Compare with the equivalent in architecture, https://www.worksinprogress.news/p/do-people-prefer-traditio..., in particular the two photos halfway down where non-architects overwhelmingly preferred the reasonably-pleasant design in the first photo while architects preferred Cell Block D in the second.
[1]: https://appleinsider.com/articles/18/01/09/iphone-battery-fi...
And I'm surprised that the reports seem to be from eight years ago, given the amount of old electronics that go through the stores
In Australia this would not comply with our fire code. Putting it behind a cabinet is fine; but it must have visible signs that can be seen from 20m away with a 20/20 eyesight (assuming no obstruction etc).
This applies to all portable extinguishers; even if it’s additional ones you’ve added beyond what’s required. The idea and intent is simple: train people and first responders to locate portable fire extinguishers by the sign.
That’s very different to it actually complying with code however. And to your second example, if I was physically attending WWDC back when they did they keynotes, I’d much rather seeing illuminated exit signs than having them (illegally) turn them off in case of a fire.
Much of building codes is either outdated, no longer the most effective way to achieve something, etc. But these building codes are written in blood. It’s why we have them.
"My emergency response plan is there will always be a trained employee." is exactly as stupid as "My emergency response plan is there will never be an emergency."
1. “Reportedly, an Apple retail or office installation has been circulating” - but they then include a tweet as their apparent source that explicitly says it’s the 5th Ave store. So why say it might be an Apple office instead?
2. Maybe they are so wishy-washy about it because they aren’t confident it’s real, but if that’s the case, then writing a lengthy article criticizing something you aren’t confident actually occurred…
3. “Reportedly, an Apple retail or office installation has been circulating” has a hyperlink across multiple words so you’d think it would be their source, but no it’s to the Apple homepage.
Just about all of gadgetreview.com is LLM writing these days.
For all we know even the original video from the tweet is ai generated.
Yeah, uh, I totally agree with you and won't be reading the rest.
No turn signal stalks, instead rotating buttons on the steering wheel. No PRND stalks either. Critical controls hidden on touchscreen behind look-then-swipe nonsense.
Also funny is the same nonsense apple has done between mouse scroll wheel movement direction and "natural" touchpad direction. Tesla's old PRND stalk was down for forward, up for reverse. New cars have touchscreen only gear select, and it is UP for forward, DOWN for reverse.
Tesla’s designs and software updates though are why I’ll probably never own one of their vehicles.