34 comments

[ 5.6 ms ] story [ 31.2 ms ] thread
Somali pirates WERE fishermen before being pirates... They turned to piracy to combat other countries fishing their waters.
And then they turn to piracy for its own sake because they realized how lucrative it was
No, the pirates are organized crime syndicates. They are not the same people who were fishing the waters 35 years ago
Perhaps they’re pirates because there are no other ways to maintain a living. Like fishing?
What’s stopping them from fishing?
That’s a great story, with very little attachment to reality.
>> Foreign fishing has increased more than twenty-fold since 1981

>> Illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing by foreign fishing vessels in Somali waters has been problematic for decades .

>> The central government collapsed in 1991, and the ensuing increase in foreign fishing became a justification for piracy against fishing vessels.

(https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles...)

Other areas of the world have had similar responses to foreign commercial fishing:

>> In Southeast Asia, as competition for fish and other maritime resources intensified following the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997-1998, increases in industrial fish catch volumes by foreign fleets led to sharp increases in South China Sea pirate attacks organized by residents of villages reliant on small-scale fisheries

(https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal...)

>> Piracy is a growing concern in Sierra Leone, particularly in the northern maritime areas. Foreign trawlers have been attacked and robbed of both their catch and personal effects. Most of the pirates are reported to be from Guinea.

(https://wikileaks.jcvignoli.com/cable_09FREETOWN258)

However, there is evidence that piracy is more likely to exist in places where illegal fishing has declined. (With the disclaimer that "this research does not refute the earlier-held notion that foreign trawlers produce dissatisfied local fishers who turn towards piracy as a defense against foreign intruders."

(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096262982...)

[delayed]
> Another alternative is one that the United States and other western states are reluctant to endorse: encouraging Sharia courts inside the clan territories. Islamic Sharia courts could be a useful, vital instrument in combating piracy.

Yiiiikes.

That's why they pirated so many Chinese ships right?
My Somali friend calls them the coastguard (half jokingly)
Honestly if Somali pirates legitimately only attacked foreign fishing vessels breaching their sovereign borders - good for them! (I mean, it's quite brutal, but don't fish in someone else's water).

However, Somali pirates attack pretty much anyone, even those not disrespecting their sovereignty, which is less cool.

> Both things can be true.

Ughhh I hear this like 5x a day now. It's the new emdashery.

Unless someone is a structural engineer or something, I never want to hear the term "load-bearing" again.
Damn shame how often people need to be reminded of this, I agree
It's actually pretty rare people need to be reminded of this because it's self-evident and platitudinous.

Much more commonly, the statement is used by writers who want to wax poetic without actually having to commit to any meaningful position on the topic at hand... which is exactly how the AI-written article in question uses it.

We must not read the same internets
[flagged]
> Kimura has told the story in Japanese interviews, and the details come from those.

It'd be nice if the article linked to the sources. There's very little substance in this article.

Besides being obviously AI editorialized, the idea that a few fishing boats were the reason Somali piracy stopped and not because of an international coalition of navies is... quite a stretch.
Fighting piracy with a supply chain is the most sushi-chef approach imaginable.