Unsubstantiated claims is one thing. If it doesn’t act to fix the politically Left biased perennial sources list, it will continue to be a propaganda machine.
I can just go in to settings and turn the battery size up?
Power over fibre?
Effectively yeah, it’s a desk lamp.
The maxed out M5 Ultra Mac Studio is only AU$28,700 / US$18,300. Peripherals not included.
Apollo the African grey parrot not infrequently asks “what this?” He may just be parroting something he heard.
Surely they’re under some kind of NDA with Defence with regards to material science and physics, and required to hobble the publicly available models.
“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.” Max Planck…
Fair chance not everyone here has the same skill set, motivations, predispositions, and so on and so forth.
Where’s the cut-of-their-funding lever? Dial #lever and say “cut off”.
Lots of ‘phones’ have a camera wart on the back. Why not several other warts for additional functionality. So long as it does effect the perceived thinness at the edges, I suppose.
> The manufacturing process for engineered quartz is now being interwoven with silicosis through the legal system, leading to manufacturers marketing “low silica” quartz at a cost premium. This premium is closing the…
I’d be easier and more cost effective to move to a well managed state, and more likely to happen in human relevant time.
The two most important fundamentals are agreements (contracts) and the ability to enforce them (that is, to seek redress) - as in: law enforcement. A high trust society. Everything else is downstream of that.
Enough with your facts and data. Obviously my feelings about things I know little about, games I have no skin in, are important. If you say anything to the contrary the group-think will downvote you. Shut up bigot. /s
It’s just government intervention in business it knows little, and can only know little, about. Only a few years earlier none of that existed. Then it did, proved highly successful, then government, which knows not what…
This is one of those completely factual statements that is not factually complete. Obviously not all (tech) companies will prove to be successful. Although, if we define success as “was acquired, investors / founders…
5 minutes ago this company didn’t exist. In 5 minutes, it won’t exist again. Say government intervenes and prevents this merger, what’s the most likely outcome? Company won’t exist in 6 minutes. In all likelihood this…
> Sam Altman said yesterday "we believe that the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology" To steelman this position: yes, obviously. Everything is defined by a set of tradeoffs.…
Convincing argument. You win good Sir. On the other hand, if you have a contribution to the conversation, please, go right ahead and make it.
Sure. Why not?
What is the title of the article we are discuss here?
[flagged]
CEO wakes up one day and decides to scuttle the company probably isn’t in the contract.
The investors would remove whichever numpty attempted to unilaterally wind the company down. The CEOs of these companies are largely just talking heads and generally interchangeable / hot-swappable with anyone willing…
Unsubstantiated claims is one thing. If it doesn’t act to fix the politically Left biased perennial sources list, it will continue to be a propaganda machine.
I can just go in to settings and turn the battery size up?
Power over fibre?
Effectively yeah, it’s a desk lamp.
The maxed out M5 Ultra Mac Studio is only AU$28,700 / US$18,300. Peripherals not included.
Apollo the African grey parrot not infrequently asks “what this?” He may just be parroting something he heard.
Surely they’re under some kind of NDA with Defence with regards to material science and physics, and required to hobble the publicly available models.
“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.” Max Planck…
Fair chance not everyone here has the same skill set, motivations, predispositions, and so on and so forth.
Where’s the cut-of-their-funding lever? Dial #lever and say “cut off”.
Lots of ‘phones’ have a camera wart on the back. Why not several other warts for additional functionality. So long as it does effect the perceived thinness at the edges, I suppose.
> The manufacturing process for engineered quartz is now being interwoven with silicosis through the legal system, leading to manufacturers marketing “low silica” quartz at a cost premium. This premium is closing the…
I’d be easier and more cost effective to move to a well managed state, and more likely to happen in human relevant time.
The two most important fundamentals are agreements (contracts) and the ability to enforce them (that is, to seek redress) - as in: law enforcement. A high trust society. Everything else is downstream of that.
Enough with your facts and data. Obviously my feelings about things I know little about, games I have no skin in, are important. If you say anything to the contrary the group-think will downvote you. Shut up bigot. /s
It’s just government intervention in business it knows little, and can only know little, about. Only a few years earlier none of that existed. Then it did, proved highly successful, then government, which knows not what…
This is one of those completely factual statements that is not factually complete. Obviously not all (tech) companies will prove to be successful. Although, if we define success as “was acquired, investors / founders…
5 minutes ago this company didn’t exist. In 5 minutes, it won’t exist again. Say government intervenes and prevents this merger, what’s the most likely outcome? Company won’t exist in 6 minutes. In all likelihood this…
> Sam Altman said yesterday "we believe that the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology" To steelman this position: yes, obviously. Everything is defined by a set of tradeoffs.…
Convincing argument. You win good Sir. On the other hand, if you have a contribution to the conversation, please, go right ahead and make it.
Sure. Why not?
What is the title of the article we are discuss here?
[flagged]
CEO wakes up one day and decides to scuttle the company probably isn’t in the contract.
The investors would remove whichever numpty attempted to unilaterally wind the company down. The CEOs of these companies are largely just talking heads and generally interchangeable / hot-swappable with anyone willing…