Couldn't sleep. Wrote some code to displays live feed of latest twitpics. (pingwire.com)
As usual, when your mind races at night, it's tough to sleep. Instead of tossing and turning, I decided to quickly bang out some code using twitter's search API that displays the latest images posted to twitpic.<p>There's probably so many places I could go with this - so, any ideas for enhancements?
50 comments
[ 4.9 ms ] story [ 101 ms ] threadThe way each image is added currently is a little "jarring" visually...
Cool though :-)
Lost interest in it though.
Sorry I don't have any links off-hand but search for nude image detector or porn detector etc and you should run into some PDFs.
I remember reading one by google guys about how they implemented the safe search filter for image search. It all comes down to identifying some features of the photo and running in through a trained ANN or SVM.
It would be cool to be able to click on one to mark it as interesting, and then also see the feed of ones that people mark as interesting (over a longer timespan.)
However, I can't help asking myself if this real adds any real value to the world. Not that it has to. It's like mental candy. Pleasing, but ultimately lacking in substance.
Anyway, this did add value to the guy who wrote it: He had fun doing it.
I've been thinking a lot about how one can differentiate between art and random shit. Once possibile filter I thought of was: 'Did it make the creator or the audience happy?' But even this doesn't work. Tolstoy disagrees with me on his very first point. http://www.csulb.edu/~jvancamp/361r14.html
"502 Bad Gateway nginx/0.6.35"
Hope that wasn't your fault ;)
It appears that some users do not fully grasp the fact that twitter (and related apps) is much more "open" than facebook. Some of the pictures seem pretty private.
I see some code related to google ads in the source but they're not showing on the page.
Maybe the code is just a placeholder.
Pingwire really is mostly javascript, the site is a simple container to deliver that javascript to your browser which will then do the rest of the work all by itself.
It also seems the block isn't perfect, if you let it run long enough some pictures will make it through.
(not the image source but the link)
Btw, it's working again.
But if you'd like to keep it to yourself, I can understand...no pressure.