When viewing a story, it'd be nice to be able to change the status without going into edit mode. Or something like a transition (aka how mingle does it) to say "start work" or "done with testing"
At this momment we do not have plans for subprojects and review tool. But we will consider them, as possible future features.
Epics or something like that seems a interesting feature. I will put it on our backlog.
No worries... Keep up the good work. Having used Jira for several years, along with Github issues and some other software for managing Projects within Projects, Epics or Milestones really help for keeping things together.
Review Tools are nice if you don't have one already in place
This looks super interesting, thank you very much for working on it, I think you're doing a great thing by making it open source. :) It's really frustrating that the tools we use for planning (e.g. Trello) generally aren't modifiable.
You are right, we currently don't have the way to see issues across all projects, but we have plans to implement something like this for future versions.
Hi, is open source, is really easy to change the font (on your own instance).
The project have an API and the web (AngularJS) application, but anybody can build an application using the api like the web application, maybe an OSX native application. A native OSX client isn't in our road-map.
An example of this is the taiga-ncurses application for terminal lovers :)
Taiga design team here!
We are currently using two fonts:
- "Open Sans Condensed Light" for the titles.
- "Droid Sans" for the text.
Both are well known fonts and extremely used. We used Droid Sans in the text to make it easily readable. Titles are supposed to be readable, of course, but creative at the same time.
We added the issue to review with more testers if they see that problem as well. Thanks for the feedback :)
Great application, I'm especially impressed with the django/rest-framework backend (getting some ideas for my own project from looking at how you guys implemented permissions...)
That said, the first thing that jumped out when I tried it was the fonts. It seems like the use of tall and skinny fonts makes it hard to read and imo hurts the design.
Definitely get more feedback on those and check out other modern/popular webapps to get ideas!
Other than that great job!
(PS It'd be awesome if you guys blogged about your use with django/restframework/angular if you haven't already!)
I could hear my hard drive screeching when I was looking at the transition on the topmost container. Even though the moving background looks nice, I'd still prefer to sustain my battery for bit longer. Your site just ate 2% of it.
I doubt it was your hard drive screeching you heard. There's nothing happening on that page that would be writing to disk. Maybe the fans were going nuts trying to keep the CPU cool.
Hi! Thank you all for your feedback; you were right about the animation at the main page: we have just changed for a static (and still awesome) image, so you may notice an improved performance from any device.
Yes, but this is meant to be intuative and well designed.
Snarky comments aside, where odoo falls down is that it tries to be everything and do everything and unsurprisingly falls short if you compare it to a single purpose application.
Thanks for the link, this looks interesting I normally use Trello and CherryTree (which is a simply stunning notes application for programmers (and none programmers but it understands how to mark up code and can export to HTML and PDF but I digress)) but this looks like it could replace Trello at least :).
In my head OpenERP was the company that took contributed code, changed the license and slapped a price tag on it? (Anyone: Feel free to defend them, - it might just be my bias against AGPL and the fact that I thought their price tag for the commercial version was unrealistic last time I evaluated it.)
Of course, Odoo has dependencies on several libs but the whole code (framework and the 240 official modules) have been written from scratch. (I wrote a huge part of it)
That's actually the reason why it's so integrated; there are no interfaces between the different apps; every app is fully standalone (you can install project management only) but fully integrates with the others when you install more modules. (timesheets on tasks, billing of projects, contracts related to projects, ...)
I love the idea of Open Source applications being distributed this way. Here's our application.... and everything required to run it in a virtual machine.
I think these features are really what sold me.. project managers might like having a visual interface to work with (webapp) but I would much rather just be in my terminals
You can do a lot of things in RT via email also, e.g. close a ticket, assign to someone else, move it to another queue, etc. with special tokens in the email body.
We're currently employing OpenProject[1], a Chili/Redmine fork with extensive Agile/Scrum[2] functionality. Despite all valid points against Redmine being bloated, it provides many features often lacking elsewhere (Auth Providers such as LDAP / Single-Sign On, Plugins).
We're going to release a migration tool from Redmine to Taiga in the following weeks. Please keep an eye if you want to try Taiga with all your Redmine projects.
The task board and sprint planing looks really good (even if it seems that they mix up two different methods with Kanban & SCRUM). I wish github would provide similar functionality out of the box.
Well, the video conferencing feature is a simple link to third party services (talky.io and appear.in) you can configure it on the admin interface of the project.
Anyway you can use talky.io and appear.in without taiga, they are great services!
Some of the text on the home page is extremely light. It makes it hard to read against the white background. From a designing standpoint I would suggest to darken that text up a bit. The "Did we say free..." text is also hard to read. Maybe put one of those transparent black boxes behind it?
Having worked on some agile project management tools, it seems that the space has an unusually high number of customer requests for slight variations/customizations. I am very optimistic about an open source implementation if it allows users to easily adjust the product to meet their specific needs. Best of luck!
Nope, sorry, we have plans of some (optional) better integration with github, anyway the API of taiga allow you to do anything you can do from the web client, and the GitHub API is great too, anyone can write a sync system between taiga and github issues/milestones. But take care, we use milestones for user stories, not issues. You can sync github issues to taiga user stories.
I've seen https://waffle.io/ talked about in previous posts, but haven't used it or Taiga. Github issues is painful enough in the past that, for companies I've been in at least, we used other issue trackers anyway (Jira and Pivotal specifically) so I'm not sure how market there is outside of open-source. For me, Taiga looks like a nicer solution for private projects (replacing redmine, trac, etc.)
Looks great, can't wait to see the demo, and the acknowledgement of entering an already crowded space. Personally I think many of the tools that are out there right now could very very easily be out-performed by an open source tool.
I sometimes wonder if killing another company's revenue by creating an open-source tool (that is as-good or better, which you generally strive to) is moral/ethical... I know it's not bad, but feels kind of weird to take their lunch
Little nitpick -- the "In Beta" stripe in the top left doesn't really mesh with the rest of your style choices (neither in font choice, tone, etc)...
I like the designs so far -- most of the sections look pretty good
Open source isnt 'the enemy' that destroys value in existing software; if your software relies on being closed source (temporarily even) to maintain its competitive edge (eg. android) thats totally up to you. It can be effective.
...but if open source destroys an existing product, honestly, that product was going the way of the dinosaurs anyway.
Morally speaking, free software unencumbered by licenses, patents and other cruft contributes far more than it harms.
They are destroying other companies revenues (but let's wait and see) and making revenues for themselves (they want to launch a PaaS at the end of the beta). This is what we call business and it happens all the time. Example: Apple and Google have been doing it to Microsoft in the last ten years.
Doing it by open source doesn't make it less or more moral than doing it by close source or any other lawful way.
Anyway, even a pure open source model would have been very moral in my humble opinion: it might harm one company but it lets many more companies lower their operating costs. One company performs worse, many companies perform better. Overall that's a good thing for me.
Looks beautiful. Our workflow however requires us to view multiple projects under one backlog/workboard. I can't seem to find a way to do that, which is a bummer because this is a really neat looking tool.
Yep, I understand what you say. But every sentence that begins with "Our workflow..." tends to be so specific that is very very difficult to build a platform that solves any possibility. taiga.io has a very powerful tag system. You could use tags to define projects. It's fast, easy and might work...
We will see if the flow is useful to enough people and if it's worth paying vs other options available right now. Project management software is hard as there are so many different way of dealing with projects.
Also, I hope it works great on mobile or it's in the plan, otherwise it might be a deal breaker.
Also, I think I like the fact it's open source with a paid hosting if we want. Let's see how they deal with that on the long term.
Taiga.io hit #1 on @HackerNewsYCBot for a while today (thanks HN!). Traffic up 100x. I was dumb enough to ask our developers if we could handle it. This is what they sent back
Each little "ball" is a request to the server
On the left: the IP numbers from the users connecting around the world
To the right: The url's being served up
In the center: The "static calls being serviced by our front end
The brightness represents the speed with which the code written by our awesome developers delivers data (aided of course the great hardware)
Had any of the balls gone past to the right, that would have been a serve we couldn't return. Try that, Federer!
Nice video, haven't seen Logstalgia in a while! At first I didn't think the traffic looked that heavy but comparing the time and requests, quite decent numbers (~6600 hits in ~2 minutes).
Cool visualization! But the top 50% of that (which seems to be the most dense) could have been completely avoided if you just slapped a CloudFront instance in front of it.
I ended up with an estimated 600USD/month bill ... so what would they gain by complicating their architecture when they're already able to handle the traffic?
And what guestimates would those be? I doubt they are serving 10TB in static files per month.
If adding a CDN to your architecture is too much complication then I would definitely not want to use your product for my business. It's literally a question of pointing CloudFront to your server, and substituting the CloudFront assigned domain in for static assets.
Also, from what I can tell, they aren't handling the traffic. I have tried numerous times to use the "Open Live Instance" link and it does not work.
1gb/week with 60% traffic to the US, average 20kb size with 1000 reset requests/month. I'd love to hear some more realistic estimates. And while (server/service) price is far from the most important consideration, it sounds like they manage to stay way under 50 usd/month in hosting currently. So as anything over 30/month would be a considerable (relative) increase. Add to that doubling? the management overhead from, say, an hour a week to two -- and they'd need to see some clear benefits? And what are those?
As for "open live instance, it says "ready soon" for me - but perhaps that is because they didn't, as you say, handle the traffic after all?
You are actually seeing the dedicated IP "custom ssl certificate" charge ($600/month). Check the cost with and without that option. I just used your exact numbers and the monthly cost is $0.73 without that.
Note that doesn't mean you cannot serve your resources over HTTPS. It just means you cannot alias something like "cdn.yoursite.com" to the cloudfront cdn, you will need to use the cloudfront https url.
I did think it came out oddly high -- I also didn't chceck ssl/dedicated ip... I think. Maybe the calculator helpfully updated itself with more "reasonable" settings... ;-)
[edit: yep, was the ssl cert thing. Now I end up with 0.00 USD/Month, which certainly isn't an unbearable expense...]
You only need to pay the $600/month if you need to support clients older than IE7. You can use the SNI option instead which is "free" (relative to the rest of the costs associated with a CFD).
Hi, the link should say (for now) "Almost ready" when you hover. We will have that ready soon (soon = days).
We don't have problems with adding a CDN at all. We do that a lot for many other projects. It's just a matter of this "stealth launch of Taiga" going out of control, we didn't need a CDN for a 1 core + 1 GB RAM virtual machine, which is what is actually handling all the traffic. Having said that, expect a CDN in place next week.
Hi, thanks. I didn't mean to indicate you weren't capable of adding a CDN. I was just providing a counter to the "why complicate the architecture" argument.
Thanks for the explanation of the "Almost Ready" message. I do see that, however I took it to mean that an instance was being spun up (as I waited). Might want to change that to "Coming Soon" or similar.
Curious about why. I'd understand a social stigma against ad-based redirection services, but does that translate into a frown against all shorteners somehow? Or is there some other cause?
Some of these aren't properties exclusive to redirection sites... but I'll readily admit they're very much standard features there, while mostly not too common elsewhere.
142 comments
[ 1.4 ms ] story [ 296 ms ] threadWhen viewing a story, it'd be nice to be able to change the status without going into edit mode. Or something like a transition (aka how mingle does it) to say "start work" or "done with testing"
We have plans to do something like you proposal, because the current behavior requires some "useless" additional clicks.
We try improve this in next versions.
Thank you very much!
Review Tools are nice if you don't have one already in place
I manage multiple concurrent projects, and I don't see an overview of open issues across projects. Am I missing that, or are there plans to add that?
Thanks!
Something else I'd like to see. Make empty columns more narrow when empty to preserve space when it can be done.
A bit off topic, but does there exists any app for these things native to OSX? I don't like these web-interfaces.
The project have an API and the web (AngularJS) application, but anybody can build an application using the api like the web application, maybe an OSX native application. A native OSX client isn't in our road-map.
An example of this is the taiga-ncurses application for terminal lovers :)
Both are well known fonts and extremely used. We used Droid Sans in the text to make it easily readable. Titles are supposed to be readable, of course, but creative at the same time.
We added the issue to review with more testers if they see that problem as well. Thanks for the feedback :)
Great application, I'm especially impressed with the django/rest-framework backend (getting some ideas for my own project from looking at how you guys implemented permissions...)
That said, the first thing that jumped out when I tried it was the fonts. It seems like the use of tall and skinny fonts makes it hard to read and imo hurts the design.
Definitely get more feedback on those and check out other modern/popular webapps to get ideas!
Other than that great job!
(PS It'd be awesome if you guys blogged about your use with django/restframework/angular if you haven't already!)
http://pixeline.github.io/bugs/
Issue management, Kanban board, extremely simple to setup (Apache, MySQL).
So it should be, Bugs is written in PHP ;)
Firefox 32.0.3 on Ubuntu
About 62 % of time is spent in FFS.CanvasRenderer.prototype.render()
Thanks!
Pretty sure you wouldn't be able to hear the actual CPU,.
The problem is the animation on the top of the page.
But the application hasn't this problem.
You can test the online demo: http://bit.ly/1CGha87
The Odoo Project website: https://www.odoo.com/page/project-management
And the github page: https://github.com/odoo/odoo
Some of the features I like in Odoo project: email gateway, pivot table reporting, cross-project tasks or reporting, timesheet integration.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odoo
Snarky comments aside, where odoo falls down is that it tries to be everything and do everything and unsurprisingly falls short if you compare it to a single purpose application.
http://www.targetprocess.com/
In my head OpenERP was the company that took contributed code, changed the license and slapped a price tag on it? (Anyone: Feel free to defend them, - it might just be my bias against AGPL and the fact that I thought their price tag for the commercial version was unrealistic last time I evaluated it.)
Of course, Odoo has dependencies on several libs but the whole code (framework and the 240 official modules) have been written from scratch. (I wrote a huge part of it)
That's actually the reason why it's so integrated; there are no interfaces between the different apps; every app is fully standalone (you can install project management only) but fully integrates with the others when you install more modules. (timesheets on tasks, billing of projects, contracts related to projects, ...)
DISCLAIMER: I am an Odoo partner.
They also have a vagrant box which you can use to take it for a spin until the live instance is ready.
https://github.com/taigaio/taiga-ncurses
https://github.com/taigaio/taiga-vagrant
We're currently employing OpenProject[1], a Chili/Redmine fork with extensive Agile/Scrum[2] functionality. Despite all valid points against Redmine being bloated, it provides many features often lacking elsewhere (Auth Providers such as LDAP / Single-Sign On, Plugins).
[1] http://openproject.org/ [2] https://www.openproject.org/projects/openproject/wiki/Agile_...
Thanks for your feedback!
Anyway you can use talky.io and appear.in without taiga, they are great services!
It would be great to not maintain 2 issues list, 2 milestones etc.
I sometimes wonder if killing another company's revenue by creating an open-source tool (that is as-good or better, which you generally strive to) is moral/ethical... I know it's not bad, but feels kind of weird to take their lunch
Little nitpick -- the "In Beta" stripe in the top left doesn't really mesh with the rest of your style choices (neither in font choice, tone, etc)...
I like the designs so far -- most of the sections look pretty good
...but if open source destroys an existing product, honestly, that product was going the way of the dinosaurs anyway.
Morally speaking, free software unencumbered by licenses, patents and other cruft contributes far more than it harms.
Doing it by open source doesn't make it less or more moral than doing it by close source or any other lawful way.
Anyway, even a pure open source model would have been very moral in my humble opinion: it might harm one company but it lets many more companies lower their operating costs. One company performs worse, many companies perform better. Overall that's a good thing for me.
We will see if the flow is useful to enough people and if it's worth paying vs other options available right now. Project management software is hard as there are so many different way of dealing with projects.
Also, I hope it works great on mobile or it's in the plan, otherwise it might be a deal breaker.
Also, I think I like the fact it's open source with a paid hosting if we want. Let's see how they deal with that on the long term.
http://goo.gl/B57ERn
Each little "ball" is a request to the server On the left: the IP numbers from the users connecting around the world To the right: The url's being served up In the center: The "static calls being serviced by our front end
The brightness represents the speed with which the code written by our awesome developers delivers data (aided of course the great hardware)
Had any of the balls gone past to the right, that would have been a serve we couldn't return. Try that, Federer!
And sweet job on Taiga, nice and clean looks!
http://calculator.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html
I ended up with an estimated 600USD/month bill ... so what would they gain by complicating their architecture when they're already able to handle the traffic?
If adding a CDN to your architecture is too much complication then I would definitely not want to use your product for my business. It's literally a question of pointing CloudFront to your server, and substituting the CloudFront assigned domain in for static assets.
Also, from what I can tell, they aren't handling the traffic. I have tried numerous times to use the "Open Live Instance" link and it does not work.
1gb/week with 60% traffic to the US, average 20kb size with 1000 reset requests/month. I'd love to hear some more realistic estimates. And while (server/service) price is far from the most important consideration, it sounds like they manage to stay way under 50 usd/month in hosting currently. So as anything over 30/month would be a considerable (relative) increase. Add to that doubling? the management overhead from, say, an hour a week to two -- and they'd need to see some clear benefits? And what are those?
As for "open live instance, it says "ready soon" for me - but perhaps that is because they didn't, as you say, handle the traffic after all?
Note that doesn't mean you cannot serve your resources over HTTPS. It just means you cannot alias something like "cdn.yoursite.com" to the cloudfront cdn, you will need to use the cloudfront https url.
[edit: yep, was the ssl cert thing. Now I end up with 0.00 USD/Month, which certainly isn't an unbearable expense...]
Thanks for the explanation of the "Almost Ready" message. I do see that, however I took it to mean that an instance was being spun up (as I waited). Might want to change that to "Coming Soon" or similar.
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1562750133...
Some of these aren't properties exclusive to redirection sites... but I'll readily admit they're very much standard features there, while mostly not too common elsewhere.
I love it.
https://code.google.com/p/logstalgia/
I do see a few balls going to the right -- what happened with those?