Your last sentence illustrates the mentality of so many (unsuccessful) startups these days.
Interesting, in my experience, I've witnessed the opposite of what you've said. Most of my friends at private schools seem to be happier and tend to be more successful than those at mid tier state universities.
It must be the flight attendant's first week on they job. Once they realize the mundane life ahead, they'll serious up.
Can you provide some quantitative studies to support these "blog" articles?
Whether it is temporary or not, at the moment, shipping is cheap and jobs are leaving the United States.
The same thing can be said about industry. All you hear about are the people who work at successful startups and top tech firms. You don't hear about the ones working at low paying fortune 500 companies as developers or…
That and getting underpaid (after COLA adjustment with the Bay Area).
You seem very optimistic about our future technology and robotic implementations.
Becoming a millionaire today is easier than ever before.
This is a terrible example and does not relate to the original post.
So if I stop getting paychecks, the government will pay for my food and housing? Sign me up. Then who will be left to work?
Great. What are the actionable next steps? We don't need ideas, we need execution.
The NSA is reading what you typed
You would leave your current job or team to find a boss who buys you software...
Yep.
Late or not, they will grow market share now.
Amazon also posts quarterly losses.
Amazon shopping is only one of many Amazon products.
To counter your single anecdotal data point, I'll give my own: in a house of 3, we routinely reach 80 Mbps with video down and upload streaming, torrents, and game downloads/game play.
I can Google the answer to those problems, 100 times, and it will still be faster than spending time learning any of those.
And what if you can prove it?
No, Naive Bayes is not better.
Or proof that they need another way to acquire new users.
Yep. If you're going to do layoffs at your startup or corporation, call a consultant, get their analysis (which is actually unnecessary), fire people, and bam, point the finger at the consultants if any backlash comes…
Exactly. If you have complaints because digital data is not protected like physical property, voice your concern to your government.
Your last sentence illustrates the mentality of so many (unsuccessful) startups these days.
Interesting, in my experience, I've witnessed the opposite of what you've said. Most of my friends at private schools seem to be happier and tend to be more successful than those at mid tier state universities.
It must be the flight attendant's first week on they job. Once they realize the mundane life ahead, they'll serious up.
Can you provide some quantitative studies to support these "blog" articles?
Whether it is temporary or not, at the moment, shipping is cheap and jobs are leaving the United States.
The same thing can be said about industry. All you hear about are the people who work at successful startups and top tech firms. You don't hear about the ones working at low paying fortune 500 companies as developers or…
That and getting underpaid (after COLA adjustment with the Bay Area).
You seem very optimistic about our future technology and robotic implementations.
Becoming a millionaire today is easier than ever before.
This is a terrible example and does not relate to the original post.
So if I stop getting paychecks, the government will pay for my food and housing? Sign me up. Then who will be left to work?
Great. What are the actionable next steps? We don't need ideas, we need execution.
The NSA is reading what you typed
You would leave your current job or team to find a boss who buys you software...
Yep.
Late or not, they will grow market share now.
Amazon also posts quarterly losses.
Amazon shopping is only one of many Amazon products.
To counter your single anecdotal data point, I'll give my own: in a house of 3, we routinely reach 80 Mbps with video down and upload streaming, torrents, and game downloads/game play.
I can Google the answer to those problems, 100 times, and it will still be faster than spending time learning any of those.
And what if you can prove it?
No, Naive Bayes is not better.
Or proof that they need another way to acquire new users.
Yep. If you're going to do layoffs at your startup or corporation, call a consultant, get their analysis (which is actually unnecessary), fire people, and bam, point the finger at the consultants if any backlash comes…
Exactly. If you have complaints because digital data is not protected like physical property, voice your concern to your government.