Well I'll let you know I have a 120Hz screen and I will only game on that screen. But a web page just sits there. And I never scroll slowly enough for refresh rate to matter, I go for big jumps that look the same on…
When they very first came out in 2014, they were mostly limited to displayport 1.2, which was unable to support 5K without either dropping to 45Hz or using chroma subsampling. So the 2014 version is excused, and we can…
I have 4K at 32". It's pretty sharp but at 6K the pixels would be significantly less visible, and I could run it at an even 200% so that older programs don't have scaling issues. And I don't need to run games at full…
I don't like smooth scrolling so my web pages might as well be scrolling at 10Hz for how much it matters visually.
Well, flicker usually has no connection to framerate on LCDs.
To have a really big impact you'd have to have that be the dominating factor at lower n and keep that "log(n)" part of the equation below 10 or so for all practical n. The latter one in particular seems unlikely to me.
LuaJIT has the same dynamism with dictionaries and it's very fast at accessing them in JIT code. I don't have enough experience with PyPy to say much about it.
A hash lookup can be very fast. There's no reason for it to be slow when it doesn't need to invoke the fallback. JITs can't remove the slowest case but they can make the normal case very fast. Saying it can't be fast…
I don't think that's a very close spirit? Saying abstractions that do exist should have no runtime cost is very different from saying which controls need to be available. This isn't really about abstractions at all,…
> No dicts or objects or lists or strings, etc. That's a really intense restriction. Sounds like the name fits; it's not general purpose, it's jit for number crunching and little else. I'm not sure exactly what you mean…
It's badly written. But section 2.c is all about how you can redistribute.
I think going to benches is fine but takes non-negligible effort. As for looking out my window from home... Maybe? It really doesn't seem like there are enough birds visible to make that worth it. The person in that…
Not just outside but to places with sufficient interesting birds. If that costs a gallon of gas, or you have limited mobility, or limited time to spend getting to the right spot, or limited free time while the sun is up…
Maybe, but that feels significantly more exotic and unlikely to me. You have to nearly negate the natural cost scaling of brute force in the thousand to million n range but lose that speed benefit later.
Yeah but you're fixing the wrong thing. The problem after reduction to 3sat is (2^sqrt(n^2)) This also means your other comment here is completely wrong: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50254142
The result is right, they wrote the parentheses in the wrong spot, don't act so shocked.
After the word "if", the entire rest of the sentence is the hypothetical.
That quote doesn't sound like advocacy of an immediate strike to me. That "if" is massive, and going into the details of why you're not already attacking is very likely to give you reasons that keep making you not…
And so does "working with". If you only ever see it accidentally and try to skim past it, you're not working with it, no matter if the word "any" shows up.
It's a lot better than just "source available". You can do most things as if it was open source. The difference between "you can sell it but you have to provide code to anyone you sell it to" and "you can't sell it but…
I love it. I can grab either end of the title bar just fine. I don't need to waste the entire middle. And if I have multiple windows I'm sacrificing more like 3 lines and it does start to matter.
> Yes we have real problems, and this one isn't Yes. > solve No that's not solving anything.
Actors dislike green screen but do you think they like pure CGI more?
It doesn't output the final result that you'd expect from a human professional, but it does seem to be well into the professional level of tools. And for cheaper productions you could use it directly.
But did you use the address of every single return or did you assume they all had the same delta? I can't find the quote you're talking about but I'll be surprised if it extends to assuming memory locations. If any…
Well I'll let you know I have a 120Hz screen and I will only game on that screen. But a web page just sits there. And I never scroll slowly enough for refresh rate to matter, I go for big jumps that look the same on…
When they very first came out in 2014, they were mostly limited to displayport 1.2, which was unable to support 5K without either dropping to 45Hz or using chroma subsampling. So the 2014 version is excused, and we can…
I have 4K at 32". It's pretty sharp but at 6K the pixels would be significantly less visible, and I could run it at an even 200% so that older programs don't have scaling issues. And I don't need to run games at full…
I don't like smooth scrolling so my web pages might as well be scrolling at 10Hz for how much it matters visually.
Well, flicker usually has no connection to framerate on LCDs.
To have a really big impact you'd have to have that be the dominating factor at lower n and keep that "log(n)" part of the equation below 10 or so for all practical n. The latter one in particular seems unlikely to me.
LuaJIT has the same dynamism with dictionaries and it's very fast at accessing them in JIT code. I don't have enough experience with PyPy to say much about it.
A hash lookup can be very fast. There's no reason for it to be slow when it doesn't need to invoke the fallback. JITs can't remove the slowest case but they can make the normal case very fast. Saying it can't be fast…
I don't think that's a very close spirit? Saying abstractions that do exist should have no runtime cost is very different from saying which controls need to be available. This isn't really about abstractions at all,…
> No dicts or objects or lists or strings, etc. That's a really intense restriction. Sounds like the name fits; it's not general purpose, it's jit for number crunching and little else. I'm not sure exactly what you mean…
It's badly written. But section 2.c is all about how you can redistribute.
I think going to benches is fine but takes non-negligible effort. As for looking out my window from home... Maybe? It really doesn't seem like there are enough birds visible to make that worth it. The person in that…
Not just outside but to places with sufficient interesting birds. If that costs a gallon of gas, or you have limited mobility, or limited time to spend getting to the right spot, or limited free time while the sun is up…
Maybe, but that feels significantly more exotic and unlikely to me. You have to nearly negate the natural cost scaling of brute force in the thousand to million n range but lose that speed benefit later.
Yeah but you're fixing the wrong thing. The problem after reduction to 3sat is (2^sqrt(n^2)) This also means your other comment here is completely wrong: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50254142
The result is right, they wrote the parentheses in the wrong spot, don't act so shocked.
After the word "if", the entire rest of the sentence is the hypothetical.
That quote doesn't sound like advocacy of an immediate strike to me. That "if" is massive, and going into the details of why you're not already attacking is very likely to give you reasons that keep making you not…
And so does "working with". If you only ever see it accidentally and try to skim past it, you're not working with it, no matter if the word "any" shows up.
It's a lot better than just "source available". You can do most things as if it was open source. The difference between "you can sell it but you have to provide code to anyone you sell it to" and "you can't sell it but…
I love it. I can grab either end of the title bar just fine. I don't need to waste the entire middle. And if I have multiple windows I'm sacrificing more like 3 lines and it does start to matter.
> Yes we have real problems, and this one isn't Yes. > solve No that's not solving anything.
Actors dislike green screen but do you think they like pure CGI more?
It doesn't output the final result that you'd expect from a human professional, but it does seem to be well into the professional level of tools. And for cheaper productions you could use it directly.
But did you use the address of every single return or did you assume they all had the same delta? I can't find the quote you're talking about but I'll be surprised if it extends to assuming memory locations. If any…