No need to announce
Why these animations in the github README? why? It just made understanding anything more difficult
That's fine, then there is no need to lie like you did.
Yes, repost
Can you clarify? I tested a few and they are rubbish and don't have the same features.
Why would one need to self-host TBs of content with Usenet? That makes no sense. It's also a lot less prone to failures than debrid services, especially with old content.
Freerdp (which this project and every other similar one depends on) is 100% broken on wayland for this use case. I'm not going back to X11.
It would probably beneficial for you to distinguish an is from an ought. The OP was descriptive, not prescriptive.
Unbelievable... Good job mate. Can't wait until one day this gets into Moonlight or something like it.
"It's a hot mess" - someone who knows absolutely nothing about what they're talking about. Typical HN comment about php.
Try Niri or PaperWM. A scrolling window manager.
Yes. Every single transaction is open for the government to inspect. There is zero privacy in pix in relation to government surveillance.
Any links to share? I don't care about security for my use case.
yes, that. it was a typo. Thanks
Because people that make an effort of announcing these things are all about virtual signaling. Nothing they do ever has real substance to it.
> pushing everyone else to provide for themselves what they had previously got from the US Did you write this, review it, then post it as if that's a bad thing? wow edit: grammar
> The moment I made up my mind about this was reading the following words written by a maintainer within the kernel community: > "we are the thin blue line" > This isn't okay. This isn't creating an inclusive…
No. It's a disaster. The poor pay for the richest to go to public universities. See Brazil. There are more low-income people in private universities (with private or private/public loans) than in public universities.
Consider that his position might be more profound than you considered it to be. Mine is. It's about incentives. Now you can take it from there, and at least in my interpretation the rest of your rebuttal falls apart.…
Yeah, and the EFF is in no way biased. at all.
That's a fair point, but scaling it vertically can take you very far in my experience.
That's different from "killing" the product / technology, which is what Google does.
[flagged]
What a silly notion. You're not affiliated to a company merely because you are their customer.
Not true at all. No red paint in it. This has been conclusively, scientifically debunked multiple times.
No need to announce
Why these animations in the github README? why? It just made understanding anything more difficult
That's fine, then there is no need to lie like you did.
Yes, repost
Can you clarify? I tested a few and they are rubbish and don't have the same features.
Why would one need to self-host TBs of content with Usenet? That makes no sense. It's also a lot less prone to failures than debrid services, especially with old content.
Freerdp (which this project and every other similar one depends on) is 100% broken on wayland for this use case. I'm not going back to X11.
It would probably beneficial for you to distinguish an is from an ought. The OP was descriptive, not prescriptive.
Unbelievable... Good job mate. Can't wait until one day this gets into Moonlight or something like it.
"It's a hot mess" - someone who knows absolutely nothing about what they're talking about. Typical HN comment about php.
Try Niri or PaperWM. A scrolling window manager.
Yes. Every single transaction is open for the government to inspect. There is zero privacy in pix in relation to government surveillance.
Any links to share? I don't care about security for my use case.
yes, that. it was a typo. Thanks
Because people that make an effort of announcing these things are all about virtual signaling. Nothing they do ever has real substance to it.
> pushing everyone else to provide for themselves what they had previously got from the US Did you write this, review it, then post it as if that's a bad thing? wow edit: grammar
> The moment I made up my mind about this was reading the following words written by a maintainer within the kernel community: > "we are the thin blue line" > This isn't okay. This isn't creating an inclusive…
No. It's a disaster. The poor pay for the richest to go to public universities. See Brazil. There are more low-income people in private universities (with private or private/public loans) than in public universities.
Consider that his position might be more profound than you considered it to be. Mine is. It's about incentives. Now you can take it from there, and at least in my interpretation the rest of your rebuttal falls apart.…
Yeah, and the EFF is in no way biased. at all.
That's a fair point, but scaling it vertically can take you very far in my experience.
That's different from "killing" the product / technology, which is what Google does.
[flagged]
What a silly notion. You're not affiliated to a company merely because you are their customer.
Not true at all. No red paint in it. This has been conclusively, scientifically debunked multiple times.